• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

斜坡位模拟气管插管过程中床角和高度对插管成功率的影响。

Impact of bed angle and height on intubation success during simulated endotracheal intubation in the ramped position.

作者信息

Nikolla Dhimitri A, Beaumont Ryann R, Lerman Jessica L, Datsko Joseph S, Carlson Jestin N

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine Allegheny Health Network-Saint Vincent Hospital, Erie Pennsylvania.

出版信息

J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2020 Mar 13;1(3):257-262. doi: 10.1002/emp2.12035. eCollection 2020 Jun.

DOI:10.1002/emp2.12035
PMID:33000040
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7493484/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The ramped position is often used during endotracheal intubation to improve oxygenation, improve laryngeal views, and reduce airway complications. We sought to compare the impact of ramp angle and bed height on intubation outcomes during simulated endotracheal intubation.

METHODS

We enrolled emergency medicine residents and fourth-year medical students to perform simulated direct laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation in random order with the mannequin in the following combinations of ramp angles and bed heights; ramp angles of 25° and 45° at bed heights including knee, mid-thigh, umbilicus, xiphoid, and nipple/intermammary fold. Our primary outcome was the reported percentage of glottic opening (POGO) score. Secondary outcomes included number of laryngoscopy attempts and intubation time.

RESULTS

We enrolled 25 participants. There was no difference in reported POGO scores at 25° between bed heights, but at 45°, the umbilicus bed height had an improved reported POGO score (20; 95% confidence interval [CI] 7-33,  < 0.01) relative to xyphoid. The nipple/inframammary fold height required longer intubation times in seconds (mean difference [MD] 95% CI) at 25°, (MD, 23.9 [4.6-37.6],  < 0.01) and more laryngoscopy attempts at 45° (MD, 0.48 [0.16-0.79],  < 0.01) relative to xyphoid. There was no difference in laryngoscopy attempts and video POGO between 25° and 45° at all bed heights, but reported POGO at the umbilicus position was better at 25° than 45° (12 [1-23],  = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

The umbilicus bed height resulted in the highest reported POGO at 45°. Nipple/inframammary fold height resulted in worse intubating conditions.

摘要

目的

在气管插管过程中,斜坡位常被用于改善氧合、改善喉镜视野并减少气道并发症。我们试图比较斜坡角度和床高对模拟气管插管过程中插管结果的影响。

方法

我们招募了急诊医学住院医师和四年级医学生,让他们对人体模型按照以下斜坡角度和床高的组合以随机顺序进行模拟直接喉镜检查和气管插管;斜坡角度为25°和45°,床高包括膝盖、大腿中部、脐部、剑突和乳头/乳腺间皱襞。我们的主要结局是报告的声门开放百分比(POGO)评分。次要结局包括喉镜检查尝试次数和插管时间。

结果

我们招募了25名参与者。在25°时,不同床高的报告POGO评分没有差异,但在45°时,相对于剑突水平,脐部床高的报告POGO评分有所改善(20;95%置信区间[CI] 7 - 33,<0.01)。相对于剑突水平,在25°时,乳头/乳腺下皱襞高度的插管时间更长(平均差[MD] 95% CI)(MD,23.9 [4.6 - 37.6],<0.01),在45°时喉镜检查尝试次数更多(MD,0.48 [0.16 - 0.79],<0.01)。在所有床高上,25°和45°之间的喉镜检查尝试次数和视频POGO没有差异,但脐部位置在25°时的报告POGO比45°时更好(12 [1 - 23],=0.03)。

结论

在45°时,脐部床高导致报告的POGO最高。乳头/乳腺下皱襞高度导致插管条件更差。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c29e/7493484/006c91aed011/EMP2-1-257-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c29e/7493484/26ac62612d62/EMP2-1-257-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c29e/7493484/006c91aed011/EMP2-1-257-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c29e/7493484/26ac62612d62/EMP2-1-257-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c29e/7493484/006c91aed011/EMP2-1-257-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Impact of bed angle and height on intubation success during simulated endotracheal intubation in the ramped position.斜坡位模拟气管插管过程中床角和高度对插管成功率的影响。
J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2020 Mar 13;1(3):257-262. doi: 10.1002/emp2.12035. eCollection 2020 Jun.
2
Pilot Study Examining Bed Angles and Heights During Ramped Position Intubation in the Emergency Department.急诊科斜坡位插管时床角度和高度的初步研究
Cureus. 2023 Apr 4;15(4):e37104. doi: 10.7759/cureus.37104. eCollection 2023 Apr.
3
Comparison of Macintosh Laryngoscopy in Bed-up-Head-Elevated Position With GlideScope Laryngoscopy: A Randomized, Controlled, Noninferiority Trial.床头抬高位下 Macintosh 喉镜与 GlideScope 喉镜比较:一项随机、对照、非劣效性试验。
Anesth Analg. 2020 Jul;131(1):210-219. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000004349.
4
An Innovative Inexpensive Portable Pulmonary Edema Intubation Simulator.一种创新的低成本便携式肺水肿插管模拟器。
J Educ Teach Emerg Med. 2020 Apr 15;5(2):I9-I20. doi: 10.21980/J8MM1R. eCollection 2020 Apr.
5
A Comparison of Three Maneuvers and Their Effect on Laryngoscopic View, Time to Intubate, and Intubation Outcome by Novice Intubators in a Simulated Airway.新手插管者在模拟气道中对三种操作及其对喉镜视野、插管时间和插管结果的影响的比较
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2017 Aug;32(4):419-423. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X17006392. Epub 2017 Apr 6.
6
Variables associated with successful intubation attempts using video laryngoscopy: a preliminary report in a helicopter emergency medical service.使用视频喉镜进行成功插管尝试的相关因素:直升机医疗急救服务中的初步报告。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2012 Apr-Jun;16(2):293-8. doi: 10.3109/10903127.2011.640764. Epub 2011 Dec 22.
7
Video laryngoscopy with the macintosh video laryngoscope in simulated prehospital scenarios by paramedic students.医学生在模拟院前场景中使用麦克阿瑟可视喉镜进行视频喉镜检查。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2009 Apr-Jun;13(2):251-5. doi: 10.1080/10903120802706070.
8
A Multicenter, Randomized Trial of Ramped Position vs Sniffing Position During Endotracheal Intubation of Critically Ill Adults.一项针对危重症成年患者气管插管时斜坡位与嗅物位的多中心随机试验。
Chest. 2017 Oct;152(4):712-722. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2017.03.061. Epub 2017 May 6.
9
Assessment of airway visualization: validation of the percentage of glottic opening (POGO) scale.气道可视化评估:声门开口百分比(POGO)量表的验证
Acad Emerg Med. 1998 Sep;5(9):919-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.1998.tb02823.x.
10
Partial vs full glottic view with CMAC D blade intubation of airway with simulated cervical spine injury: a randomized controlled trial.CMAC D 刀片经口气管插管在模拟颈椎损伤气道中观察声门的部分与完全视野:一项随机对照试验。
Expert Rev Med Devices. 2023 Feb;20(2):151-160. doi: 10.1080/17434440.2023.2174850. Epub 2023 Feb 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Bed-up-head-elevated Position versus Supine Sniffing Position in Patients Undergoing Rapid Sequence Intubation Using Direct Laryngoscopy in the Emergency Department - A Randomized Controlled Trial.急诊科使用直接喉镜进行快速顺序插管患者中床头抬高体位与仰卧位嗅物位的比较——一项随机对照试验
J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2024 Apr-Jun;17(2):58-65. doi: 10.4103/jets.jets_109_23. Epub 2024 Jun 26.
2
Success rates of endotracheal intubation using the standard method versus the modified-ramped position.使用标准方法与改良斜坡位进行气管插管的成功率。
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2023 Sep 27;85(11):5491-5496. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000001331. eCollection 2023 Nov.
3
Pilot Study Examining Bed Angles and Heights During Ramped Position Intubation in the Emergency Department.急诊科斜坡位插管时床角度和高度的初步研究
Cureus. 2023 Apr 4;15(4):e37104. doi: 10.7759/cureus.37104. eCollection 2023 Apr.
4
Time to Renitrogenation After Maximal Denitrogenation in Healthy Volunteers in the Supine and Sitting Positions.健康志愿者在仰卧和坐姿下最大程度去氮后复氮的时间。
West J Emerg Med. 2022 Nov 1;23(6):926-930. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2022.5.55378.
5
Comparison of the Glottic Views in a Head Elevated Laryngoscopy Position with the Patient in Supine or 25º Backup: An Observer-Blinded Randomised Clinical Trial.头高位喉镜检查体位与仰卧位或25°后仰位患者声门视野的比较:一项观察者盲法随机临床试验。
Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim. 2021 Dec;49(6):453-459. doi: 10.5152/TJAR.2021.1058.
6
Comparison of RAMP and New Modified RAMP Positioning in Laryngoscopic View During Intubation in Patients with Morbid Obesity: A Randomized Clinical Trial.病态肥胖患者插管时RAMP与新改良RAMP定位在喉镜视野中的比较:一项随机临床试验
Anesth Pain Med. 2021 Jun 29;11(3):e114508. doi: 10.5812/aapm.114508. eCollection 2021 Jun.
7
A comparative study of haemodynamic effects of single-blinded orotracheal intubations with intubating laryngeal mask airway, Macintosh and McGrath video laryngoscopes.经口盲探气管插管与 Macintosh、McGrath 视频喉镜和插管型喉罩在血流动力学影响方面的比较研究。
Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2021;53(1):30-36. doi: 10.5114/ait.2021.103663.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of Macintosh Laryngoscopy in Bed-up-Head-Elevated Position With GlideScope Laryngoscopy: A Randomized, Controlled, Noninferiority Trial.床头抬高位下 Macintosh 喉镜与 GlideScope 喉镜比较:一项随机、对照、非劣效性试验。
Anesth Analg. 2020 Jul;131(1):210-219. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000004349.
2
Multicenter Comparison of Nonsupine Versus Supine Positioning During Intubation in the Emergency Department: A National Emergency Airway Registry (NEAR) Study.多中心比较急诊科非仰卧位与仰卧位插管:国家急救气道登记研究(NEAR)。
Acad Emerg Med. 2019 Oct;26(10):1144-1151. doi: 10.1111/acem.13805. Epub 2019 Jun 25.
3
A Multicenter, Randomized Trial of Ramped Position vs Sniffing Position During Endotracheal Intubation of Critically Ill Adults.一项针对危重症成年患者气管插管时斜坡位与嗅物位的多中心随机试验。
Chest. 2017 Oct;152(4):712-722. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2017.03.061. Epub 2017 May 6.
4
Feasibility of  upright patient positioning and intubation success rates At two academic EDs.在两家学术性急诊科进行直立位患者体位摆放的可行性及插管成功率研究。
Am J Emerg Med. 2017 Jul;35(7):986-992. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2017.02.011. Epub 2017 Feb 5.
5
Effects of an elevated position on time to tracheal intubation by novice intubators using Macintosh laryngoscopy or videolaryngoscopy: randomized crossover trial.新手使用麦金托什喉镜或视频喉镜进行气管插管时,抬高体位对插管时间的影响:随机交叉试验
Clin Exp Emerg Med. 2015 Sep 30;2(3):174-178. doi: 10.15441/ceem.15.048. eCollection 2015 Sep.
6
Cross-over study of novice intubators performing endotracheal intubation in an upright versus supine position.新手插管者在直立位与仰卧位进行气管插管的交叉研究。
Intern Emerg Med. 2017 Jun;12(4):513-518. doi: 10.1007/s11739-016-1481-z. Epub 2016 Jun 14.
7
Evaluation of oxygen saturation values in different body positions in healthy individuals.健康个体不同体位下血氧饱和度值的评估。
J Clin Nurs. 2016 Apr;25(7-8):1095-100. doi: 10.1111/jocn.13189. Epub 2016 Feb 16.
8
Head-Elevated Patient Positioning Decreases Complications of Emergent Tracheal Intubation in the Ward and Intensive Care Unit.床头抬高的患者体位可降低病房和重症监护病房中紧急气管插管的并发症。
Anesth Analg. 2016 Apr;122(4):1101-7. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001184.
9
Comparison of the rate of successful endotracheal intubation between the "sniffing" and "ramped" positions in patients with an expected difficult intubation: a prospective randomized study.预期插管困难患者中“嗅物位”与“斜坡位”气管插管成功率的比较:一项前瞻性随机研究
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2015 Apr;68(2):116-21. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2015.68.2.116. Epub 2015 Mar 30.
10
Incidence and factors associated with cardiac arrest complicating emergency airway management.急诊气道管理中并发心搏骤停的发生率及相关因素。
Resuscitation. 2013 Nov;84(11):1500-4. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2013.07.022. Epub 2013 Aug 1.