• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Functional hearing quality in prelingually deaf school-age children and adolescents with cochlear implants.人工耳蜗植入后语前聋学龄儿童和青少年的功能性听力质量。
Int J Audiol. 2021 Apr;60(4):282-292. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2020.1826586. Epub 2020 Oct 1.
2
Verbal learning and memory in prelingually deaf children with cochlear implants.接受人工耳蜗植入的语前聋儿童的言语学习与记忆
Int J Audiol. 2018 Oct;57(10):746-754. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2018.1481538. Epub 2018 Jun 22.
3
Prelingually Deaf Children With Cochlear Implants Show Better Perception of Voice Cues and Speech in Competing Speech Than Postlingually Deaf Adults With Cochlear Implants.植入人工耳蜗的语前聋儿童比植入人工耳蜗的语后聋成人对竞争语音中的语音线索和语音有更好的感知。
Ear Hear. 2024;45(4):952-968. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001489. Epub 2024 Apr 15.
4
Cochlear Implants or Hearing Aids: Speech Perception, Language, and Executive Function Outcomes.人工耳蜗植入或助听器:言语感知、语言和执行功能结果。
Ear Hear. 2023;44(2):411-422. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001300. Epub 2022 Dec 21.
5
Recognizing spoken words in semantically-anomalous sentences: Effects of executive control in early-implanted deaf children with cochlear implants.在语义异常句子中识别口语词:人工耳蜗植入的早期聋儿的执行控制作用。
Cochlear Implants Int. 2021 Jul;22(4):223-236. doi: 10.1080/14670100.2021.1884433. Epub 2021 Mar 5.
6
Speed of Information Processing and Verbal Working Memory in Children and Adolescents With Cochlear Implants.信息处理速度和有听力植入设备的儿童及青少年的言语工作记忆。
Otol Neurotol. 2023 Sep 1;44(8):e613-e620. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000003966. Epub 2023 Jul 25.
7
Measures of digit span and verbal rehearsal speed in deaf children after more than 10 years of cochlear implantation.聋童人工耳蜗植入 10 年以上后的数字跨度和言语复述速度测量。
Ear Hear. 2011 Feb;32(1 Suppl):60S-74S. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181ffd58e.
8
Language processing fluency and verbal working memory in prelingually deaf long-term cochlear implant users: A pilot study.语前聋长期使用人工耳蜗者的语言处理流畅性和言语工作记忆:一项初步研究。
Cochlear Implants Int. 2018 Nov;19(6):312-323. doi: 10.1080/14670100.2018.1493970. Epub 2018 Jul 5.
9
High-Variability Sentence Recognition in Long-Term Cochlear Implant Users: Associations With Rapid Phonological Coding and Executive Functioning.长期人工耳蜗使用者的高变异性句子识别:与快速语音编码和执行功能的关联。
Ear Hear. 2019 Sep/Oct;40(5):1149-1161. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000691.
10
Verbal Fluency in Prelingually Deaf, Early Implanted Children and Adolescents With Cochlear Implants.聋前聋童和人工耳蜗植入青少年的言语流畅性。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2023 Apr 12;66(4):1394-1409. doi: 10.1044/2022_JSLHR-22-00383. Epub 2023 Mar 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Verbal Fluency in Prelingually Deaf, Early Implanted Children and Adolescents With Cochlear Implants.聋前聋童和人工耳蜗植入青少年的言语流畅性。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2023 Apr 12;66(4):1394-1409. doi: 10.1044/2022_JSLHR-22-00383. Epub 2023 Mar 1.
2
Estimating Early Language Input in Deaf and Hard of Hearing Children With the Language Access Profile Tool.使用语言访问档案工具评估聋儿和重听儿童的早期语言输入。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2022 Sep 7;31(5):2132-2144. doi: 10.1044/2022_AJSLP-21-00222. Epub 2022 Aug 31.
3
Verbal Working Memory Error Patterns and Speech-Language Outcomes in Youth With Cochlear Implants.人工耳蜗植入儿童言语工作记忆错误模式与言语语言结局
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2021 Dec 13;64(12):4949-4963. doi: 10.1044/2021_JSLHR-21-00114. Epub 2021 Nov 11.

本文引用的文献

1
Assessing Higher Order Language Processing in Long-Term Cochlear Implant Users.评估长期人工耳蜗植入者的高阶语言处理能力。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2019 Nov 19;28(4):1537-1553. doi: 10.1044/2019_AJSLP-18-0138. Epub 2019 Oct 16.
2
Consensus practice parameter: audiological assessment and management of unilateral hearing loss in children.共识实践参数:儿童单侧听力损失的听力学评估和管理。
Int J Audiol. 2019 Dec;58(12):805-815. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2019.1654620. Epub 2019 Sep 5.
3
Cochlear Implant Quality of Life (CIQOL): Development of a Profile Instrument (CIQOL-35 Profile) and a Global Measure (CIQOL-10 Global).人工耳蜗生活质量量表(CIQOL):特定领域量表(CIQOL-35 特定领域)和总体量表(CIQOL-10 总体)的制定。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2019 Sep 20;62(9):3554-3563. doi: 10.1044/2019_JSLHR-H-19-0142. Epub 2019 Sep 4.
4
High-Variability Sentence Recognition in Long-Term Cochlear Implant Users: Associations With Rapid Phonological Coding and Executive Functioning.长期人工耳蜗使用者的高变异性句子识别:与快速语音编码和执行功能的关联。
Ear Hear. 2019 Sep/Oct;40(5):1149-1161. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000691.
5
Language processing fluency and verbal working memory in prelingually deaf long-term cochlear implant users: A pilot study.语前聋长期使用人工耳蜗者的语言处理流畅性和言语工作记忆:一项初步研究。
Cochlear Implants Int. 2018 Nov;19(6):312-323. doi: 10.1080/14670100.2018.1493970. Epub 2018 Jul 5.
6
Three challenges for future research on cochlear implants.人工耳蜗未来研究面临的三大挑战。
World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018 Jan 2;3(4):240-254. doi: 10.1016/j.wjorl.2017.12.010. eCollection 2017 Dec.
7
Learning from the Longitudinal Outcomes of Children with Hearing Impairment (LOCHI) study: summary of 5-year findings and implications.从听力障碍儿童纵向结果研究(LOCHI)中学习:5年研究结果总结及启示
Int J Audiol. 2018 May;57(sup2):S105-S111. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2017.1385865. Epub 2017 Oct 12.
8
Potential Benefits of an Integrated Electric-Acoustic Sound Processor with Children: A Preliminary Report.集成式电声声音处理器对儿童的潜在益处:初步报告。
J Am Acad Audiol. 2017 Feb;28(2):127-140. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.15133.
9
Questionnaire-based assessment of executive functioning: Psychometrics.基于问卷的执行功能评估:心理测量学。
Appl Neuropsychol Child. 2018 Apr-Jun;7(2):93-109. doi: 10.1080/21622965.2016.1248557. Epub 2016 Nov 14.
10
Hearing Impairment and Cognitive Energy: The Framework for Understanding Effortful Listening (FUEL).听力障碍与认知能量:理解费力听力的框架(FUEL)
Ear Hear. 2016 Jul-Aug;37 Suppl 1:5S-27S. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000312.

人工耳蜗植入后语前聋学龄儿童和青少年的功能性听力质量。

Functional hearing quality in prelingually deaf school-age children and adolescents with cochlear implants.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.

Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.

出版信息

Int J Audiol. 2021 Apr;60(4):282-292. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2020.1826586. Epub 2020 Oct 1.

DOI:10.1080/14992027.2020.1826586
PMID:33000660
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8012403/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study investigated differences in functional hearing quality between youth with cochlear implants (CIs) and normal hearing (NH) peers, as well as associations between functional hearing quality and audiological measures, speech perception, language and executive functioning (EF).

DESIGN

Youth with CIs and NH peers completed measures of audiological functioning, speech perception, language and EF. Parents completed the Quality of Hearing Scale (QHS), a questionnaire measure of functional hearing quality.

STUDY SAMPLE

Participants were 43 prelingually-deaf, early-implanted, long-term CI users and 43 NH peers aged 7-17 years.

RESULTS

Compared to NH peers, youth with CIs showed poorer functional hearing quality on the QHS Speech, Localization, and Sounds subscales and more hearing effort on the QHS Effort subscale. QHS scores did not correlate significantly with audiological/hearing history measures but were significantly correlated with most speech perception, language and EF scores in the CI sample. In the NH sample, QHS scores were uncorrelated with speech perception and language and were inconsistently correlated with EF.

CONCLUSIONS

The QHS is a valid measure of functional hearing quality that is distinct from office-based audiometric or hearing history measures. Functional hearing outcomes are associated with speech-language and EF outcomes in CI users.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在调查植入人工耳蜗(CI)的青年与正常听力(NH)同龄人之间的功能性听力质量差异,以及功能性听力质量与听力学测量、言语感知、语言和执行功能(EF)之间的关联。

设计

CI 和 NH 同龄人的青年完成了听力学功能、言语感知、语言和 EF 的测量。家长完成了听力质量量表(QHS),这是一种功能性听力质量的问卷测量。

研究样本

参与者为 43 名语前聋、早期植入、长期使用 CI 的患者和 43 名 NH 同龄人,年龄在 7-17 岁之间。

结果

与 NH 同龄人相比,CI 患者在 QHS 言语、定位和声音分量表上的功能性听力质量较差,在 QHS 努力分量表上的听力努力程度较高。QHS 评分与听力学/听力史测量指标无显著相关性,但与 CI 组的大多数言语感知、语言和 EF 评分显著相关。在 NH 组中,QHS 评分与言语感知和语言无关,与 EF 相关性不一致。

结论

QHS 是一种有效的功能性听力质量测量方法,与基于办公室的测听或听力史测量方法不同。CI 用户的功能性听力结果与言语语言和 EF 结果相关。