Hülür Gizem, Siebert Jelena Sophie, Wahl Hans-Werner
School of Aging Studies, University of South Florida.
Institute of Educational Science, Heidelberg University.
Dev Psychol. 2020 Dec;56(12):2345-2357. doi: 10.1037/dev0001112. Epub 2020 Oct 1.
Previous research documented positive associations between cognitively stimulating work and levels of cognitive performance, while longitudinal associations are less clear. We used 20-year longitudinal data from the Interdisciplinary Longitudinal Study of Adult Development and Aging (ILSE) to examine the role of perceived work environment (autonomy, innovation, social integration, and stress) and work activities derived from an occupational database (related to information, to people, and manual activities) for trajectories of cognitive abilities (processing speed, fluid and crystallized intelligence). We used data from 374 participants in the ILSE midlife cohort (born 1950-52) who were working at baseline and had valid observations on work characteristics and control variables including education, gender, region (former East vs. West Germany), and personal income (mean age at baseline = 44 years, = 1, 44% women). Cognitively stimulating perceived work environments (higher levels of autonomy and innovation), higher levels of work activities related to information and people, and lower levels of manual activity at baseline were related to higher initial levels of cognitive ability. Higher work stress was related to higher baseline fluid ability. These associations were largely not independent of control variables. Higher social integration at work was related to less steep increase in crystallized intelligence and higher work stress was related to less decline in processing speed. In sum, our findings were more in line with selection rather than with enrichment effects, with the caveat that our findings rely on work variables taken at baseline. We discuss potential mechanisms underlying these findings. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).
先前的研究记录了认知刺激工作与认知表现水平之间的正相关关系,而纵向关联则不太明确。我们使用了来自成人发展与衰老跨学科纵向研究(ILSE)的20年纵向数据,以检验感知工作环境(自主性、创新性、社会融合和压力)以及从职业数据库中得出的工作活动(与信息、人员和体力活动相关)对认知能力轨迹(处理速度、流体智力和晶体智力)的作用。我们使用了ILSE中年队列中374名参与者的数据(出生于1950 - 1952年),他们在基线时处于工作状态,并且对工作特征以及包括教育、性别、地区(原东德与西德)和个人收入在内的控制变量有有效观测值(基线时的平均年龄 = 44岁,标准差 = 1,44%为女性)。在基线时,感知到的认知刺激工作环境(更高水平的自主性和创新性)、与信息和人员相关的更高水平的工作活动以及更低水平的体力活动与更高的初始认知能力水平相关。更高的工作压力与更高的基线流体能力相关。这些关联在很大程度上并非独立于控制变量。工作中更高的社会融合与晶体智力增长不那么陡峭相关,更高的工作压力与处理速度下降较少相关。总之,我们的研究结果更符合选择效应而非丰富效应,但需注意的是,我们的研究结果依赖于基线时获取的工作变量。我们讨论了这些发现背后潜在的机制。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2020美国心理学会,保留所有权利)