Wettstein Markus, Tauber Benjamin, Kuźma Elżbieta, Wahl Hans-Werner
Department of Psychological Aging Research, Institute of Psychology, Heidelberg University.
Institute of Health Research, University of Exeter Medical School.
Psychol Aging. 2017 May;32(3):259-277. doi: 10.1037/pag0000166. Epub 2017 Feb 23.
Research on relationships between personality and cognitive abilities has so far resulted in inconsistent findings regarding the strength of the associations. Moreover, relationships have rarely been compared longitudinally and bidirectionally between midlife versus late-life cohorts by considering different personality traits as well as multiple cognitive domains over a long-term follow-up period. We hypothesize that the interplay between the "Big Five" personality traits (Neuroticism, Extraversion, Openness to Experience, Agreeableness and Conscientiousness) and cognitive abilities (information processing speed, crystallized intelligence, fluid intelligence) may change from midlife to old age due to age-associated changes in cognitive and personality plasticity. We used data from the German Interdisciplinary Longitudinal Study of Adult Development (ILSE study; n = 1,002). Participants were either born in 1950/52 (midlife sample, n = 502) or in 1930/32 (late-life sample, n = 500) and followed up for up to 12 years. Based on bivariate latent change score regression models (adjusted for gender, education, self-rated and physician-rated health), we observed that, apart from very few exceptions, the intervariable cross-lagged associations between personality traits and cognitive abilities were generally similar between cohorts. Moreover, in case of neuroticism, extraversion, and openness, the effects of cognitive abilities on change in personality were stronger than the reversed effects. Our findings thus suggest that the so far predominant perspective of personality in middle adulthood and late-life as a predictor, rather than as an outcome, of cognitive abilities needs more differentiation and reconsideration. (PsycINFO Database Record
迄今为止,关于人格与认知能力之间关系的研究,在关联强度方面得出了不一致的结果。此外,在长期随访期间,很少通过考虑不同的人格特质以及多个认知领域,对中年与老年队列之间的关系进行纵向和双向比较。我们假设,由于认知和人格可塑性的年龄相关变化,“大五”人格特质(神经质、外向性、经验开放性、宜人性和尽责性)与认知能力(信息处理速度、晶体智力、流体智力)之间的相互作用可能从中年到老年发生变化。我们使用了来自德国成人发展跨学科纵向研究(ILSE研究;n = 1,002)的数据。参与者要么出生于1950/52年(中年样本,n = 502),要么出生于1930/32年(老年样本,n = 500),并随访了长达12年。基于双变量潜在变化分数回归模型(对性别、教育程度、自评和医生评定的健康状况进行了调整),我们观察到,除了极少数例外情况,各队列中人格特质与认知能力之间的变量间交叉滞后关联总体上相似。此外,在神经质、外向性和开放性方面,认知能力对人格变化的影响强于反向影响。因此,我们的研究结果表明,迄今为止在中年和老年期将人格主要视为认知能力的预测因素而非结果的观点,需要更多的区分和重新考虑。(PsycINFO数据库记录)