Chamberlain R T, Stafford D T, Maijub A G, McNatt B C
Clin Chem. 1977 Sep;23(9):1764-6.
We compared a gas-chromatographic method for determination of phenytoin with a high-pressure liquid chromatographic technique and with enzyme immunoassay by three instrumental procedures. More than 100 sera from patients being treated with this drug were assayed by all these techniques. The coefficient of variation was the lowest (4.0%) with liquid chromatography, but all methods gave a CV of less than 10%. The correlation coefficients for all methods exceeded 0.97 when compared to gas chromatography. Operation costs varied with the number of tests per batch, reagent costs, and operator labor costs. All assays gave comparable values for the therapeutic range, so it would be plausible to use more than one method in a situation where (e.g.) satellite laboratories handle different quantities of assays. In any of these techniques, interferences from carbamazepine, mephenytoin, phenobarbital, and primidone were negligible.
我们通过三种仪器方法,将一种用于测定苯妥英的气相色谱法与高压液相色谱技术以及酶免疫测定法进行了比较。用所有这些技术对100多份正在接受该药物治疗的患者血清进行了检测。液相色谱法的变异系数最低(4.0%),但所有方法的变异系数均小于10%。与气相色谱法相比,所有方法的相关系数均超过0.97。运营成本因每批检测数量、试剂成本和操作人员劳动力成本而异。所有检测方法在治疗范围内给出的数值相当,因此在(例如)卫星实验室处理不同数量检测的情况下使用不止一种方法是合理的。在任何这些技术中,卡马西平、美芬妥英、苯巴比妥和扑米酮的干扰均可忽略不计。