Faculty of Medicine of the University of Porto Alameda Prof. Hernâni Monteiro, 4200-319, Porto, Portugal; CINTESIS R. Dr. Plácido da Costa, 4200-450 Porto, Portugal; S. João Hospital Center, Alameda Prof. Hernâni Monteiro, 4200-319, Porto, Portugal; Porto Health School Rua Dr. António Bernardino de Almeida 400, 4200 - 072, Porto, Portugal.
Porto Health School Rua Dr. António Bernardino de Almeida 400, 4200 - 072, Porto, Portugal; Center for Rehabilitation Research Rua Dr. António Bernardino de Almeida 400, 4200 - 072, Porto, Portugal.
Surg Oncol. 2020 Dec;35:351-373. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2020.09.004. Epub 2020 Sep 16.
The preoperative localisation of non-palpable lesions guided by breast imaging is an important and required procedure for breast-conserving surgery. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature on the comparative impact of different techniques for guided surgical excision of non-palpable breast lesions from reports of clinical or patient-reported outcomes and costs. A literature search of PubMed, ISI, SCOPUS and Cochrane databases was conducted for relevant publications and their references, along with public documents, national and international guidelines, conference proceedings and presentations. From 5720 retrieved articles screened through title and abstract, 5346 were excluded and 374 assessed for full-text eligibility. For data extraction and quality assessment, 49 studies were included. Results of this review demonstrate that Radioactive Seed Localisation (RSL) and Radioactive Occult Lesion Localisation (ROLL) outperform Wire in terms of involved margins and reoperations. Between RSL and ROLL, there is a tendency to favour RSL. Similarly, Clip-guided localisation seems preferred when compared to ROLL, however further studies are needed. In summary, there seems to exist evidence that RSL and ROLL are better than Wire, representing potential alternatives, with a quick learning curve, better scheduling and management issues. Although, for recent techniques, more research is needed in order to achieve the same level of evidence.
在保乳手术中,通过乳腺影像学引导对不可触及病变进行术前定位是一项重要且必需的操作。我们对不同引导技术切除不可触及乳腺病变的临床或患者报告结局和成本的比较影响进行了系统评价和荟萃分析。通过 PubMed、ISI、SCOPUS 和 Cochrane 数据库对相关文献及其参考文献进行了检索,并查阅了公开文件、国家和国际指南、会议记录和演示文稿。通过标题和摘要筛选出 5720 篇文章,其中 5346 篇被排除,374 篇评估了全文的合格性。对 49 项研究进行了数据提取和质量评估。本综述的结果表明,放射性种子定位(RSL)和放射性隐匿性病变定位(ROLL)在切缘和再次手术方面优于导丝。在 RSL 和 ROLL 之间,倾向于 RSL。同样,与 ROLL 相比,夹引导定位似乎更有优势,但需要进一步研究。总之,似乎有证据表明 RSL 和 ROLL 优于导丝,代表了潜在的替代方案,具有快速的学习曲线、更好的计划和管理问题。然而,对于新技术,需要进行更多的研究以达到相同的证据水平。