Department of Cardiac Electrophysiology and Arrhythmology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; San Raffaele Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy.
Department of Cardiac Electrophysiology and Arrhythmology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 Oct 6;76(14):1644-1656. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.08.012.
Little is known about the risk stratification of patients with myocarditis undergoing ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation.
This study sought to describe VT ablation results and identify factors associated with arrhythmia recurrences in a cohort of patients with myocarditis.
The authors enrolled 125 consecutive patients with myocarditis, undergoing VT ablation. Before ablation, disease stage was evaluated, to identify active (AM) versus previous myocarditis (PM). The primary study endpoint was assessment of VT recurrences by 12-month follow-up. Predictors of VT recurrences were retrospectively identified.
All patients (age 51 ± 14 years, 91% men, left ventricular ejection fraction 52% ± 9%) had history of myocarditis diagnosed by endomyocardial biopsy (59%) and/or cardiac magnetic resonance (90%). Furthermore, all had multiple episodes of drug-refractory VTs. Multimodal pre-procedural staging identified 47 patients with AM (38%) and 78 patients with PM (62%). All patients showed low-voltage areas (LVA) at electroanatomical map (97% epicardial or endoepicardial); of them, 25 (20%) had wide borderzone (WBZ, constituting >50% of the whole LVA). VT recurrences were documented in 25 patients (20%) by 12 months, and in 43 (34%) by last follow-up (median 63 months; interquartile range: 39 to 87). At multivariable analysis, AM stage was the only predictor of VT recurrences by 12 months (hazard ratio: 9.5; 95% confidence interval: 2.6 to 35.3; p < 0.001), whereas both AM stage and WBZ were associated with arrhythmia recurrences anytime during follow-up. No VT episodes were found after redo ablation was performed in 23 patients during PM stage.
Our findings suggest that VT ablation should be avoided during AM, but is often of benefit for recurrent VT after the acute phase of myocarditis.
对于心肌炎患者行室性心动过速(VT)消融术的风险分层知之甚少。
本研究旨在描述心肌炎患者行 VT 消融术的结果,并确定与心律失常复发相关的因素。
作者纳入了 125 例连续的心肌炎患者,行 VT 消融术。在消融术之前,评估疾病阶段,以确定活动性心肌炎(AM)与陈旧性心肌炎(PM)。主要研究终点为 12 个月随访时评估 VT 复发情况。回顾性确定 VT 复发的预测因素。
所有患者(年龄 51 ± 14 岁,91%为男性,左心室射血分数 52% ± 9%)均有经心内膜心肌活检(59%)和/或心脏磁共振(90%)诊断的心肌炎病史。此外,所有患者均有多次药物难治性 VT 发作。多模式术前分期确定 47 例 AM(38%)和 78 例 PM(62%)患者。所有患者的电生理标测图上均显示低电压区(LVA)(97%为心外膜或心内膜);其中 25 例(20%)存在宽边界区(WBZ,构成整个 LVA 的>50%)。12 个月时,25 例(20%)患者记录到 VT 复发,末次随访时(中位数 63 个月;四分位距:39 至 87)43 例(34%)患者记录到 VT 复发。多变量分析显示,AM 阶段是 12 个月时 VT 复发的唯一预测因素(风险比:9.5;95%置信区间:2.6 至 35.3;p<0.001),而 AM 阶段和 WBZ 均与随访期间任何时候的心律失常复发相关。在 PM 阶段,23 例患者行再次消融术,均未再出现 VT 发作。
我们的研究结果表明,AM 期应避免行 VT 消融术,但对心肌炎急性期后反复发作的 VT 可能有益。