• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器人辅助脾切除术与腹腔镜脾切除术治疗儿童血液系统疾病的比较。

A comparison of robotic-assisted splenectomy and laparoscopic splenectomy for children with hematologic disorders.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH.

Department of Pediatric Surgery, Nationwide Children's Hospital, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH.

出版信息

J Pediatr Surg. 2021 May;56(5):1047-1050. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2020.08.031. Epub 2020 Sep 8.

DOI:10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2020.08.031
PMID:33004189
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Laparoscopic splenectomy (LS) is the standard of care for hematologic disorders requiring splenectomy. Less is known about the outcomes following robotic-assisted splenectomy (RS) for this indication. Our aim was to describe outcomes of RS to LS in pediatric patients with hematologic disorders in our institution.

METHODS

A single institution retrospective review was performed of pediatric patients undergoing LS vs. RS from 2014 to 2019. Patient demographics, diagnosis, spleen size, hospital length of stay (LOS), operative time, post-operative opioid use, and hospital charges were evaluated. Standard univariate analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Twenty-four patients were included in the study (14 LS, 10 RS). The mean spleen size at the time of surgery was larger in the RS group compared to LS (14.5 cm vs. 12.2 cm, p = 0.03). Operative time between the two cohorts was comparable (RS 140.5 vs LS 154.9 min). Median LOS for RS was shorter than LS (2.1 vs. 3.2 days, p = 0.02). Cumulative postoperative opioid analgesic requirements were not significantly different between the groups (17.4 mg vs. 30.5 mg). The median hospital charges, including the surgical procedure and hospital stay were higher in the RS group ($44,724 RS vs $30,255 LS, p = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Robotic splenectomy is a safe and feasible option for pediatric patients with hematologic disorders, and was associated with decreased LOS but higher charges compared to laparoscopic splenectomy. Further studies are required to delineate the optimal use and potential benefits of robot-assisted surgical techniques in children.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

摘要

简介

腹腔镜脾切除术(LS)是治疗需要脾切除术的血液系统疾病的标准治疗方法。对于这种适应证,机器人辅助脾切除术(RS)的结果知之甚少。我们的目的是描述我院小儿血液系统疾病患者行 RS 转为 LS 的结果。

方法

对 2014 年至 2019 年期间行 LS 与 RS 的小儿患者进行了单中心回顾性研究。评估了患者的人口统计学特征、诊断、脾脏大小、住院时间(LOS)、手术时间、术后阿片类药物使用和住院费用。进行了标准的单变量分析。

结果

本研究共纳入 24 例患者(14 例行 LS,10 例行 RS)。RS 组手术时脾脏大小大于 LS 组(14.5cm 比 12.2cm,p=0.03)。两组手术时间相当(RS 组 140.5 分钟,LS 组 154.9 分钟)。RS 组的中位 LOS 短于 LS 组(2.1 天比 3.2 天,p=0.02)。两组术后累积阿片类药物镇痛需求无显著差异(17.4mg 比 30.5mg)。RS 组的中位住院费用(包括手术和住院费用)高于 LS 组(44724 美元比 30255 美元,p=0.01)。

结论

对于血液系统疾病的小儿患者,机器人脾切除术是一种安全可行的选择,与腹腔镜脾切除术相比,它具有较短的 LOS,但费用较高。需要进一步研究阐明机器人辅助手术技术在儿童中的最佳应用和潜在益处。

证据水平

II 级。

相似文献

1
A comparison of robotic-assisted splenectomy and laparoscopic splenectomy for children with hematologic disorders.机器人辅助脾切除术与腹腔镜脾切除术治疗儿童血液系统疾病的比较。
J Pediatr Surg. 2021 May;56(5):1047-1050. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2020.08.031. Epub 2020 Sep 8.
2
Robotic-Assisted and Laparoscopic Splenectomy in Children: A Single Center Comparative Study.机器人辅助与腹腔镜儿童脾切除术:单中心比较研究。
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2024 Jun;34(6):541-545. doi: 10.1089/lap.2023.0221. Epub 2024 Jan 8.
3
A case controlled comparison of open and laparoscopic splenectomy in children.儿童开放性与腹腔镜脾切除术的病例对照比较。
Surgery. 1998 Oct;124(4):670-5; discussion 675-6. doi: 10.1067/msy.1998.91223.
4
Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic splenectomy in children: a costeffectiveness study.机器人辅助与腹腔镜脾切除术治疗儿童脾切除术:成本效益研究。
J Robot Surg. 2024 Jan 27;18(1):51. doi: 10.1007/s11701-023-01783-9.
5
Comparison of early postoperative results between robot-assisted and laparoscopic splenectomy for non-traumatic splenic diseases rather than portal hypertensive hypersplenism-a meta-analysis.机器人辅助与腹腔镜脾切除术治疗非创伤性脾疾病而非门静脉高压性脾功能亢进症的早期术后结果比较——一项荟萃分析。
Asian J Surg. 2020 Jan;43(1):36-43. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2019.07.010. Epub 2019 Jul 23.
6
Refining the selection criteria for laparoscopic versus open splenectomy for splenomegaly.优化脾肿大患者腹腔镜与开腹脾切除术的选择标准。
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2008 Feb;18(1):13-9. doi: 10.1089/lap.2007.0050.
7
Laparoscopic versus open splenectomy in the pediatric population: a contemporary single-center experience.小儿腹腔镜与开放性脾切除术:当代单中心经验
Am Surg. 2001 Sep;67(9):859-63; discussion 863-4.
8
Effect of spleen size on splenectomy outcome. A comparison of open and laparoscopic surgery.脾脏大小对脾切除术结果的影响。开放手术与腹腔镜手术的比较。
Surg Endosc. 1999 Jun;13(6):559-62. doi: 10.1007/s004649901040.
9
Laparoscopic versus open splenectomy: a comparative study.腹腔镜与开放性脾切除术:一项对比研究。
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2000 Oct;10(5):291-5.
10
Laparoscopic Splenectomy: Has It Become the Standard Surgical Approach in Pediatric Patients?腹腔镜脾切除术:是否已成为小儿患者的标准手术方法?
J Surg Res. 2019 Aug;240:109-114. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.02.045. Epub 2019 Mar 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Splenic vein diameter/portal vein diameter ratio as a predictor of portal vein thrombosis after laparoscopic splenectomy in children.脾静脉直径与门静脉直径之比作为儿童腹腔镜脾切除术后门静脉血栓形成的预测指标
Pediatr Surg Int. 2025 Aug 29;41(1):276. doi: 10.1007/s00383-025-06171-y.
2
Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic splenectomy in children: a costeffectiveness study.机器人辅助与腹腔镜脾切除术治疗儿童脾切除术:成本效益研究。
J Robot Surg. 2024 Jan 27;18(1):51. doi: 10.1007/s11701-023-01783-9.
3
Paediatric robotic surgery: a narrative review.
儿科机器人手术:叙述性综述。
J Robot Surg. 2023 Aug;17(4):1171-1179. doi: 10.1007/s11701-023-01523-z. Epub 2023 Jan 16.
4
Laparoscopic management of benign splenic tumors in children.儿童良性脾脏肿瘤的腹腔镜治疗
World J Pediatr Surg. 2022 Jul 20;5(4):e000419. doi: 10.1136/wjps-2022-000419. eCollection 2022.
5
Robotically Assisted Surgery in Children-A Perspective.儿童机器人辅助手术——一种视角
Children (Basel). 2022 Jun 6;9(6):839. doi: 10.3390/children9060839.
6
Scarless laparoscopic incisions in Pfannenstiel (slip): the first 50 cases using an innovative approach in pediatric robotic surgery.经脐单部位腹腔镜手术(滑入式)在小儿机器人手术中的应用:50 例创新入路的初步经验。
J Robot Surg. 2023 Feb;17(1):215-221. doi: 10.1007/s11701-022-01419-4. Epub 2022 May 27.