Institute of Cancer Research and Basic Medical Sciences of Chinese Academy of Sciences, China; Department of Radiology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China; Department of Radiology, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, China.
Institute of Cancer Research and Basic Medical Sciences of Chinese Academy of Sciences, China; Department of Radiotherapy, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China; Department of Radiology, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, China.
Acad Radiol. 2020 Dec;27(12):1655-1664. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2020.09.002. Epub 2020 Sep 29.
To evaluate and compare the performance of radiomics in predicting induction chemotherapy response treated with two different regimens in patients with advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
A total of 265 patients with pathologically confirmed locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (stage II-IV), including 115 treated with gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GP group) and 150 treated with docetaxel plus cisplatin (TP group) were retrospectively enrolled. Radiomics features were extracted from the volume of interest delineated in multi-MR sequences on a 3T scanner. After random stratified grouping (training and validation cohorts) and logistic regression based on selected features, the association between the radiomics signature and the early response to induction chemotherapy were established for GP and TP regiments, respectively.
Clinical factors showed no significant difference between the response and non-response groups for the GP and TP regiments (all p > 0.05). The accuracy of the radiomics signature consisting of selected features from the joint T1, T2, and T1C in the GP group (0.852 in the training cohort vs. 0.853 in the validation cohort) was significantly higher than that in the TP group (0.774 vs 0.727). The overall performance of the GP model was steady, with efficiency to distinguish responders from nonresponders with an AUC reaching 0.907 (95% confidence interval [CI] [0.843-0.970]) in the training cohort and 0.886 (95% CI [0.772-0.998]) in the validation cohort, while leveling at 0.800 (95% CI [0.712-0.888]) in the training cohort and 0.863 (95% CI [0.758-0.967]) in the validation cohort in the TP group.
Pretreatment MR radiomics signature can better predict the early response to IC in the GP regimen than the TP regimen, which may be helpful to guide IC management.
评估并比较放射组学在预测两种不同方案诱导化疗治疗晚期鼻咽癌患者疗效中的表现。
回顾性纳入 265 例经病理证实的局部晚期鼻咽癌患者(Ⅱ-Ⅳ期),其中 115 例接受吉西他滨联合顺铂(GP 组)治疗,150 例接受多西他赛联合顺铂(TP 组)治疗。从 3T 扫描仪多 MR 序列勾画的感兴趣区提取放射组学特征。在基于选定特征的随机分层分组(训练和验证队列)和逻辑回归后,分别为 GP 和 TP 方案建立放射组学特征与诱导化疗早期疗效的相关性。
GP 和 TP 组的疗效组和非疗效组之间的临床因素无显著差异(均 P>0.05)。在 GP 组中,由联合 T1、T2 和 T1C 序列的选定特征组成的放射组学特征(训练队列中为 0.852,验证队列中为 0.853)的准确性明显高于 TP 组(0.774 比 0.727)。GP 模型的整体性能稳定,在训练队列中的 AUC 达到 0.907(95%置信区间 [CI] [0.843-0.970]),在验证队列中达到 0.886(95% CI [0.772-0.998]),可以有效区分应答者和非应答者,而在 TP 组中,在训练队列和验证队列中分别为 0.800(95% CI [0.712-0.888])和 0.863(95% CI [0.758-0.967])。
与 TP 方案相比,治疗前 MR 放射组学特征能更好地预测 GP 方案诱导化疗的早期疗效,可能有助于指导 IC 管理。