• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新冠疫情期间低质量研究造成的惨重损失:呼吁提高研究质量。

The carnage of substandard research during the COVID-19 pandemic: a call for quality.

机构信息

Luxembourg Agency for Research Integrity, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg

Bond University Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.

出版信息

J Med Ethics. 2020 Dec;46(12):803-807. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2020-106494. Epub 2020 Oct 1.

DOI:10.1136/medethics-2020-106494
PMID:33004545
Abstract

Worldwide there are currently over 1200 research studies being performed on the topic of COVID-19. Many of these involve children and adults over age 65 years. There are also numerous studies testing investigational vaccines on healthy volunteers. No research team is exempt from the pressures and speed at which COVID-19 research is occurring. And this can increase the risk of honest error as well as misconduct. To date, 33 papers have been identified as unsuitable for public use and either retracted, withdrawn, or noted with concern. Asia is the source of most of these manuscripts (n=19; 57.6%) with China the largest Asian subgroup (n=11; 57.9%). This paper explores these findings and offers guidance for responsible research practice during pandemics.

摘要

目前,全球有超过 1200 项研究正在进行 COVID-19 相关研究。其中许多研究涉及儿童和 65 岁以上的成年人。还有许多研究正在对健康志愿者进行试验性疫苗测试。没有任何研究团队能够免受 COVID-19 研究的压力和速度的影响。这可能会增加诚实错误和不当行为的风险。迄今为止,已经确定有 33 篇论文不适合公开使用,要么被撤回,要么被撤回,要么被撤回。亚洲是这些论文的主要来源(n=19;57.6%),中国是最大的亚洲亚组(n=11;57.9%)。本文探讨了这些发现,并为大流行期间的负责任研究实践提供了指导。

相似文献

1
The carnage of substandard research during the COVID-19 pandemic: a call for quality.新冠疫情期间低质量研究造成的惨重损失:呼吁提高研究质量。
J Med Ethics. 2020 Dec;46(12):803-807. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2020-106494. Epub 2020 Oct 1.
2
An alarming retraction rate for scientific publications on Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19).关于 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的科学出版物惊人的撤回率。
Account Res. 2021 Jan;28(1):47-53. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2020.1782203. Epub 2020 Jun 23.
3
COVID-19 Global health crisis.COVID-19 全球健康危机。
Saudi Med J. 2021 Jan;42(1):3-4. doi: 10.15537/smj.2021.1.25663.
4
Ethics of clinical research and practice in India during the Covid-19 pandemic.印度新冠疫情期间临床研究与实践的伦理问题。
Indian J Med Ethics. 2020 Jul-Sep;V(3):175-180. doi: 10.20529/IJME.2020.080.
5
Perils of Precipitate Publication: Fraudulent and Substandard COVID-19 Research.仓促发表的危害:欺诈性和不合格的COVID-19研究。
J Law Med. 2020 Aug;27(4):779-789.
6
A Study of Policies and Guidelines for Collecting, Processing, and Storing Coronavirus Disease 2019 Patient Biospecimens for Biobanking and Research.关于收集、处理和存储2019冠状病毒病患者生物样本用于生物样本库和研究的政策与指南研究
Biopreserv Biobank. 2020 Dec;18(6):511-516. doi: 10.1089/bio.2020.0099. Epub 2020 Dec 4.
7
Academic Journal Retractions and the COVID-19 Pandemic.学术期刊撤稿与新冠疫情
J Prim Care Community Health. 2021 Jan-Dec;12:21501327211015592. doi: 10.1177/21501327211015592.
8
Concerns Expressed by Chinese Social Media Users During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Content Analysis of Sina Weibo Microblogging Data.新冠疫情期间中国社交媒体用户表达的担忧:对新浪微博数据的内容分析
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Nov 26;22(11):e22152. doi: 10.2196/22152.
9
Towards universal health coverage: lessons learnt from the COVID-19 pandemic in Africa.迈向全民健康覆盖:从非洲新冠疫情中汲取的经验教训。
Pan Afr Med J. 2020 Jul 30;35(Suppl 2):128. doi: 10.11604/pamj.supp.2020.35.2.24769. eCollection 2020.
10
Correcting the pandemic: Analysis of corrections to journal articles on COVID-19 and Ebola.纠正大流行:对关于新冠病毒和埃博拉病毒的期刊文章的更正分析。
J Glob Health. 2020 Dec;10(2):020105. doi: 10.7189/jogh.10.020105.

引用本文的文献

1
Ivermectin repurposing for COVID-19: pharmacological and bibliometric analysis.伊维菌素用于治疗新冠肺炎的重新定位:药理学和文献计量学分析。
Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 2025 May 6. doi: 10.1007/s00210-025-04233-5.
2
Parental Mental Health and Child Maltreatment in the COVID-19 Pandemic: Importance of Sampling in a Quantitative Statistical Study.新冠疫情期间的父母心理健康与儿童虐待:定量统计研究中抽样的重要性
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jan 24;27:e52043. doi: 10.2196/52043.
3
The complexity of addressing equity in COVID-19-related global health governance and population health research priorities in Canada: a multilevel qualitative study.
加拿大新冠肺炎相关全球卫生治理中的公平性问题及人口健康研究重点的复杂性:一项多层次定性研究
BMC Public Health. 2024 Dec 5;24(1):3381. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-20893-z.
4
Evolution of WHO COVID-19 mask guidelines amid intense demands for rapid advice.在对快速建议的强烈需求下,世界卫生组织新冠病毒口罩指南的演变
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024 Nov 8;4(11):e0003778. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003778. eCollection 2024.
5
Using an expert survey and user feedback to construct PRECHECK: A checklist to evaluate preprints on COVID-19 and beyond.利用专家调查和用户反馈来构建 PRECHECK:一个评估 COVID-19 及其他预印本的清单。
F1000Res. 2024 Jun 3;12:588. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.129814.3. eCollection 2023.
6
Automatic categorization of self-acknowledged limitations in randomized controlled trial publications.自我承认的随机对照试验出版物局限性的自动分类。
J Biomed Inform. 2024 Apr;152:104628. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2024.104628. Epub 2024 Mar 26.
7
A survey of surveys: an evaluation of the quality of published surveys in neurosurgery.调查研究综述:对神经外科学已发表调查研究质量的评估。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2024 Mar 26;166(1):150. doi: 10.1007/s00701-024-06042-w.
8
Six dilemmas for stakeholders inherently affecting data sharing during a zoonotic (re-)emerging infectious disease outbreak response.在人畜共患(再)新发传染病疫情应对期间,利益相关者面临的 6 大困境必然会影响数据共享。
BMC Infect Dis. 2024 Feb 12;24(1):185. doi: 10.1186/s12879-024-09054-0.
9
Is biomedical research self-correcting? Modelling insights on the persistence of spurious science.生物医学研究能自我纠错吗?关于虚假科学持续存在的建模见解。
R Soc Open Sci. 2024 Jan 31;11(1):231056. doi: 10.1098/rsos.231056. eCollection 2024 Jan.
10
Evaluating the dependability of reference-driven citation forecasts amid the COVID-19 pandemic: A bibliometric analysis across diverse journals.评估 COVID-19 大流行期间基于参考文献的引文预测的可靠性:跨不同期刊的文献计量分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Jan 19;103(3):e36219. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000036219.