Department of Plant Biology, Faculty of Sciences, University of Pécs, Ifjúság u. 6, Pecs, 7624, Hungary.
Sci Rep. 2020 Oct 1;10(1):16303. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-73548-5.
Tobacco plants were grown in plant chambers for four weeks, then exposed to one of the following treatments for 4 days: (1) daily supplementary UV-B radiation corresponding to 6.9 kJ m d biologically effective dose (UV-B), (2) daily irrigation with 0.1 mM hydrogen peroxide, or (3) a parallel application of the two treatments (UV-B + HO). Neither the HO nor the UV-B treatments were found to be damaging to leaf photosynthesis. Both single factor treatments increased leaf HO contents but had distinct effects on various HO neutralising mechanisms. Non-enzymatic HO antioxidant capacities were increased by direct HO treatment only, but not by UV-B. In contrast, enzymatic HO neutralisation was mostly increased by UV-B, the responses showing an interesting diversity. When class-III peroxidase (POD) activity was assayed using an artificial substrate (ABTS, 2,2'-azino-bis (3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulphonic acid)), both treatments appeared to have a positive effect. However, only UV-B-treated leaves showed higher POD activities when phenolic compounds naturally occurring in tobacco leaves (chlorogenic acid or quercetin) were used as substrates. These results demonstrate a substrate-dependent, functional heterogeneity in POD and further suggest that the selective activation of specific isoforms in UV-B acclimated leaves is not triggered by excess HO in these leaves.
烟草植物在植物室中生长四周,然后暴露于以下处理之一 4 天:(1)每日补充与 6.9 kJ m d 生物学有效剂量(UV-B)对应的 UV-B 辐射,(2)每日用 0.1 mM 过氧化氢灌溉,或(3)两种处理(UV-B + HO)的平行应用。HO 和 UV-B 处理都不会对叶片光合作用造成损害。两种单因素处理均增加叶片 HO 含量,但对各种 HO 中和机制有不同的影响。非酶 HO 抗氧化能力仅通过直接 HO 处理增加,但不通过 UV-B。相比之下,UV-B 主要增加了酶 HO 中和,反应表现出有趣的多样性。当使用人工底物(ABTS,2,2'-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulphonic acid))测定 III 类过氧化物酶(POD)活性时,两种处理似乎都有积极的影响。然而,只有用 UV-B 处理的叶片在使用烟草叶中天然存在的酚类化合物(绿原酸或槲皮素)作为底物时,才显示出更高的 POD 活性。这些结果表明 POD 具有底物依赖性功能异质性,并进一步表明在 UV-B 驯化叶片中,特定同工酶的选择性激活不是由这些叶片中过量的 HO 触发的。