Suppr超能文献

三种塑料地膜类型与农药中38种活性物质之间相互作用的实验室比较。

A laboratory comparison of the interactions between three plastic mulch types and 38 active substances found in pesticides.

作者信息

Beriot Nicolas, Zomer Paul, Zornoza Raul, Geissen Violette

机构信息

Soil Physics and Land Management Group, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, Netherlands.

Sustainable Use, Management and Reclamation of Soil and Water Research Group, Universidad Politécnica de Cartagena, Cartagena, Murcia, Spain.

出版信息

PeerJ. 2020 Sep 21;8:e9876. doi: 10.7717/peerj.9876. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In semi-arid regions, the use of plastic mulch and pesticides in conventional agriculture is nearly ubiquitous. Although the sorption of pesticides on Low Density Polyethylene (LDPE) has been previously studied, no data are available for other plastics such as Pro-oxidant Additive Containing (PAC) plastics or "biodegradable" (Bio) plastics. The aim of this research was to measure the sorption pattern of active substances from pesticides on LDPE, PAC and Bio plastic mulches and to compare the decay of the active substances in the presence and absence of plastic debris.

METHODS

For this purpose, 38 active substances from 17 insecticides, 15 fungicides and six herbicides commonly applied with plastic mulching in South-east Spain were incubated with a 3 × 3 cm piece of plastic mulch (LDPE, PAC and Bio). The incubation was done in a solution of 10% acetonitrile and 90% distilled water at 35 °C for 15 days in the dark. The Quick Easy Cheap Effective Rugged Safe approach was adapted to extract the pesticides.

RESULTS

The sorption behavior depended on both the pesticide and the plastic mulch type. On average, the sorption percentage was ~23% on LDPE and PAC and ~50% on Bio. The decay of active substances in the presence of plastic was ~30% lesser than the decay of active substances in solution alone. This study is the first attempt at assessing the behavior of a diversity of plastic mulches and pesticides to further define research needs.

摘要

背景

在半干旱地区,传统农业中塑料薄膜和农药的使用几乎无处不在。尽管此前已经研究了农药在低密度聚乙烯(LDPE)上的吸附情况,但对于其他塑料,如含促氧化剂添加剂(PAC)的塑料或“可生物降解”(Bio)塑料,尚无相关数据。本研究的目的是测量农药中活性物质在LDPE、PAC和Bio塑料薄膜上的吸附模式,并比较在有和没有塑料碎片情况下活性物质的降解情况。

方法

为此,将西班牙东南部与塑料薄膜一起常用的17种杀虫剂、15种杀菌剂和6种除草剂中的38种活性物质与一块3×3厘米的塑料薄膜(LDPE、PAC和Bio)一起孵育。孵育在10%乙腈和90%蒸馏水的溶液中于35℃黑暗条件下进行15天。采用快速、简便、廉价、有效、耐用、安全(QuEChERS)方法提取农药。

结果

吸附行为取决于农药和塑料薄膜类型。平均而言,LDPE和PAC上的吸附百分比约为23%,Bio上约为50%。有塑料存在时活性物质的降解比单独在溶液中活性物质的降解少约30%。本研究是首次尝试评估多种塑料薄膜和农药的行为,以进一步确定研究需求。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c095/7513747/beb12537f60a/peerj-08-9876-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验