Jara Rocío Fernanda, Crego Ramiro Daniel, Samuel Michael David, Rozzi Ricardo, Jiménez Jaime Enrique
Department of Biological Sciences, University of North Texas, Denton, TX, United States of America.
Sub-Antarctic Biocultural Conservation Program, University of North Texas, Denton, TX, United States of America.
PeerJ. 2020 Sep 21;8:e9892. doi: 10.7717/peerj.9892. eCollection 2020.
Birds can maximize their reproductive success through careful selection of nest-sites. The 'total-foliage' hypothesis predicts that nests concealed in vegetation should have higher survival. We propose an additional hypothesis, the 'predator proximity' hypothesis, which states that nests placed farther from predators would have higher survival. We examined these hypotheses in the world's southernmost forests of Navarino Island, in the Cape Horn Biosphere reserve, Chile (55°S). This island has been free of mammalian ground predators until recently, and forest passerines have been subject to depredation only by diurnal and nocturnal raptors.
During three breeding seasons (2014-2017), we monitored 104 nests for the five most abundant open-cup forest-dwelling passerines (, , , , and ). We identified nest predators using camera traps and assessed whether habitat characteristics affected nest-site selection and survival.
Nest predation was the main cause of nest failure (71% of failed nests). was the most common predator, depredating 13 (87%) of the 15 nests where we could identify a predator. By contrast, the recently introduced mammal , the only ground predator, depredated one nest (7%). Species selected nest-sites with more understory cover and taller understory, which according to the total-foliage hypothesis would provide more concealment against both avian and mammal predators. However, these variables negatively influenced nest survival. The apparent disconnect between selecting nest-sites to avoid predation and the actual risk of predation could be due to recent changes in the predator assemblage driven by an increased abundance of native associated with urban development, and/or the introduction of exotic mammalian ground predators to this island. These predator assemblage changes could have resulted in an ecological trap. Further research will be needed to assess hypotheses that could explain this mismatch between nest-site selection and nest survival.
鸟类可以通过精心选择筑巢地点来最大化它们的繁殖成功率。“全叶”假说预测,隐藏在植被中的巢穴应该具有更高的存活率。我们提出了另一个假说,即“捕食者距离”假说,该假说认为距离捕食者更远的巢穴将具有更高的存活率。我们在智利纳瓦里诺岛(南纬55°)最南端的森林,即合恩角生物圈保护区,检验了这些假说。直到最近,这个岛屿都没有地面哺乳动物捕食者,森林雀形目鸟类仅受到昼间和夜间猛禽的捕食。
在三个繁殖季节(2014 - 2017年),我们监测了104个巢穴,这些巢穴属于五种最常见的开放式杯状巢、栖息在森林中的雀形目鸟类([此处原文缺失鸟的具体种类])。我们使用相机陷阱识别巢穴捕食者,并评估栖息地特征是否影响筑巢地点的选择和巢穴存活率。
巢穴被捕食是巢穴失败的主要原因(71%的失败巢穴)。[此处原文缺失捕食者的具体种类]是最常见的捕食者,在我们能够识别捕食者的15个巢穴中,它捕食了13个(87%)。相比之下,最近引入的哺乳动物[此处原文缺失哺乳动物的具体种类],作为唯一的地面捕食者,只捕食了一个巢穴(7%)。这些物种选择了林下植被覆盖更多且林下植被更高的筑巢地点,根据“全叶”假说,这将为抵御鸟类和哺乳动物捕食者提供更多的隐蔽。然而,这些变量对巢穴存活率产生了负面影响。在选择筑巢地点以避免被捕食和实际被捕食风险之间明显的脱节,可能是由于城市发展导致本地[此处原文缺失相关物种]数量增加,以及/或者外来地面哺乳动物捕食者被引入该岛,从而驱动了捕食者组合的近期变化。这些捕食者组合的变化可能导致了一个生态陷阱。需要进一步的研究来评估能够解释筑巢地点选择和巢穴存活率之间这种不匹配的假说。