Aierqing Sarengaowa, Nakagawa Akiko, Ouchi Yoshimitsu, Bungo Takashi
Laboratory of Animal Behavior and Physiology, Graduate School of Integrated Sciences for Life, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.
J Adv Vet Anim Res. 2020 Aug 22;7(3):477-481. doi: 10.5455/javar.2020.g444. eCollection 2020 Sep.
The objective of this study is to determine whether there is a relationship between hair whorl position and temperament in Chinese Yellow cattle using a questionnaire. Also, the effect of the raising environment is investigated.
A total of 122 Chinese Yellow cattle were surveyed in 3 village areas and four grassland areas in the northern area of China. For each cattle, an investigator asked the care-person about each item of a temperament questionnaire and determined the facial hair whorl position of each cattle. The location of hair whorl was categorized as low, middle, or high in relation to the eyes.
The overall distribution was 20.5% high, 58.2% middle, 13.1% low, 6.6% double, and 1.6% no hair whorl. There was no significant difference between the grassland and village area cattle in the distribution of whorl position. The scores of grassland areas were significantly higher than those of village areas in terms of "Retentive memory", "Sensitivity," and "Timidity" and lower in "Docility" and "Fortitude." The scores for the high position tended to be higher than those for the middle plus low positions in terms of "Adaptability" and "Obedience." On the other hand, there was a tendency for a score for the high position to be lower than the other positions in "Excitability." A significant interaction between area and whorl position was observed in "Friendliness to cattle."
These findings suggest that hair whorl location may be useful in predicting the temperament in cattle, but temperament can be influenced by environment and/or handlings.
本研究旨在通过问卷调查确定中国黄牛的发旋位置与性情之间是否存在关联。同时,调查饲养环境的影响。
在中国北方的3个村庄地区和4个草原地区对总共122头中国黄牛进行了调查。对于每头牛,一名调查员向饲养员询问性情问卷中的每个项目,并确定每头牛面部发旋的位置。发旋的位置相对于眼睛被分类为低、中或高。
总体分布为高位占20.5%,中位占58.2%,低位占13.1%,双旋占6.6%,无发旋占1.6%。草原地区和村庄地区的牛在发旋位置分布上没有显著差异。在“记忆力”、“敏感度”和“胆小”方面,草原地区的得分显著高于村庄地区,而在“温顺”和“坚韧”方面则较低。在“适应性”和“顺从性”方面,高位的得分往往高于中位加低位的得分。另一方面,在“兴奋性”方面,高位的得分有低于其他位置的趋势。在“对牛的友好度”方面,观察到地区和发旋位置之间存在显著的交互作用。
这些发现表明,发旋位置可能有助于预测牛的性情,但性情可能会受到环境和/或饲养方式的影响。