• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The 100 Top-Cited Systematic Reviews/Meta-Analyses on Diabetic Research.100 篇糖尿病研究高被引系统评价/荟萃分析。
J Diabetes Res. 2020 Sep 11;2020:5767582. doi: 10.1155/2020/5767582. eCollection 2020.
2
The top-cited systematic reviews/meta-analyses in tuberculosis research: A PRISMA-compliant systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis.结核病研究中被引用次数最多的系统评价/荟萃分析:一项符合PRISMA标准的系统文献综述和文献计量分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Feb;96(6):e4822. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000004822.
3
Top 100 cited systematic reviews and meta-analyses in dentistry.口腔医学领域被引频次最高的 100 篇系统评价和荟萃分析。
Acta Odontol Scand. 2020 Mar;78(2):87-97. doi: 10.1080/00016357.2019.1653495. Epub 2019 Aug 16.
4
A bibliometric study of the top 100 most-cited randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in endodontic journals.一篇关于牙科学期刊发表的前 100 篇被引频次最高的随机对照试验、系统评价和荟萃分析的文献计量学研究。
Int Endod J. 2019 Sep;52(9):1297-1316. doi: 10.1111/iej.13131. Epub 2019 May 13.
5
Citation classics in systematic reviews and meta-analyses: who wrote the top 100 most cited articles?系统评价和荟萃分析中的引文经典:谁写了前 100 篇被引频次最高的文章?
PLoS One. 2013 Oct 14;8(10):e78517. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0078517. eCollection 2013.
6
The top 100 most cited scientific reports focused on diabetes research.被引用次数最多的100份科学报告聚焦于糖尿病研究。
Acta Diabetol. 2016 Feb;53(1):13-26. doi: 10.1007/s00592-015-0813-1. Epub 2015 Nov 23.
7
Top 100 cited systematic reviews and meta-analyses in the major journals of oral and maxillofacial surgery: a bibliometric analysis.主要口腔颌面外科杂志中被引频次最高的 100 篇系统评价和荟萃分析:文献计量分析。
Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2022 Sep;26(3):343-356. doi: 10.1007/s10006-021-00981-9. Epub 2021 Sep 7.
8
Bibliometric evaluation of systematic review and meta analyses published in the top 5 "high-impact" radiology journals.对发表在顶级 5 大“高影响力”放射学期刊上的系统评价和荟萃分析的文献计量学评估。
Clin Imaging. 2021 Mar;71:52-62. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2020.11.008. Epub 2020 Nov 6.
9
A bibliometric analysis of the 100 top-cited systematic review and meta-analysis in Orthodontics.正畸学 100 篇高被引系统评价和荟萃分析的文献计量学分析
Dental Press J Orthod. 2024 Jun 10;29(2):e242401. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.29.2.e242401.oar. eCollection 2024.
10
The 100 top-cited systematic reviews/meta-analyses in central venous catheter research: A PRISMA-compliant systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis.100 篇中心静脉导管研究中被引频次最高的系统评价/荟萃分析:一项符合 PRISMA 原则的系统文献回顾和文献计量学分析。
Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2020 Apr;57:102803. doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2020.102803. Epub 2020 Feb 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Bibliometric Research in Neurosurgery: A Review of the 50 Most Cited Bibliometric Publications in the Neurosurgical Literature.神经外科领域的文献计量学研究:神经外科文献中被引用次数最多的50篇文献计量学出版物综述
Cureus. 2024 Aug 19;16(8):e67247. doi: 10.7759/cureus.67247. eCollection 2024 Aug.
2
A bibliometric perspective to the most cited diabetes articles.从文献计量学角度看被引用次数最多的糖尿病相关文章。
J Diabetes Metab Disord. 2023 Feb 26;22(1):763-773. doi: 10.1007/s40200-023-01199-0. eCollection 2023 Jun.
3
The 100 Top-Cited Studies on Loneliness: A Bibliometric Analysis.关于孤独感的100篇被引用次数最多的研究:文献计量分析。
Cureus. 2023 Apr 7;15(4):e37246. doi: 10.7759/cureus.37246. eCollection 2023 Apr.
4
The intellectual base and research fronts of IL-37: A bibliometric review of the literature from WoSCC.IL-37 的知识基础和研究前沿:基于 WoSCC 文献的文献计量学综述。
Front Immunol. 2022 Jul 22;13:931783. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.931783. eCollection 2022.
5
The 100 Top-Cited Studies on Neuropsychology: A Bibliometric Analysis.神经心理学领域被引用次数最多的100项研究:文献计量分析
Front Psychol. 2020 Nov 30;11:550716. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.550716. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

1
The 100 Top-cited Articles in Main Allergy Journals: A Bibliometric Analysis.主要过敏学期刊中被引用次数最多的100篇文章:一项文献计量分析。
Iran J Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2019 Nov 5;18(6):688-700. doi: 10.18502/ijaai.v18i6.2182.
2
Circulating Tissue Factor-Positive Procoagulant Microparticles in Patients with Type 1 Diabetes.1型糖尿病患者循环中组织因子阳性促凝微粒
Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2019 Dec 31;12:2819-2828. doi: 10.2147/DMSO.S225761. eCollection 2019.
3
Monotherapy with Metformin versus Sulfonylureas and Risk of Cancer in Type 2 Diabetic Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.二甲双胍单药治疗与磺脲类药物治疗 2 型糖尿病患者的癌症风险:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Diabetes Res. 2019 Nov 19;2019:7676909. doi: 10.1155/2019/7676909. eCollection 2019.
4
Association between Sarcopenia and Renal Function in Patients with Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.肌少症与糖尿病患者肾功能的关系:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Diabetes Res. 2019 Nov 18;2019:1365189. doi: 10.1155/2019/1365189. eCollection 2019.
5
Association of leukocyte telomere length with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in patients with type 2 diabetes.白细胞端粒长度与 2 型糖尿病患者非酒精性脂肪肝的相关性。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2019 Dec 20;132(24):2927-2933. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000000559.
6
Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Metformin, Glyburide, and Insulin in Treating Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Meta-Analysis.二甲双胍、格列本脲和胰岛素治疗妊娠期糖尿病的疗效和安全性比较:一项荟萃分析。
J Diabetes Res. 2019 Nov 4;2019:9804708. doi: 10.1155/2019/9804708. eCollection 2019.
7
Efficacy and safety of anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies combined with different chemotherapy regimens in patients with RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis.抗 EGFR 单克隆抗体联合不同化疗方案治疗 RAS 野生型转移性结直肠癌患者的疗效和安全性:一项荟萃分析。
J Evid Based Med. 2019 Nov;12(4):300-312. doi: 10.1111/jebm.12360. Epub 2019 Oct 9.
8
Association between obesity and adipokines levels in saliva and gingival crevicular fluid: A systematic review and meta-analysis.肥胖与唾液和龈沟液中脂肪因子水平的相关性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Evid Based Med. 2019 Nov;12(4):313-324. doi: 10.1111/jebm.12363. Epub 2019 Sep 4.
9
The 100 top-cited studies in cancer immunotherapy.癌症免疫治疗的 100 篇高被引研究。
Artif Cells Nanomed Biotechnol. 2019 Dec;47(1):2282-2292. doi: 10.1080/21691401.2019.1623234.
10
Hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence in living and deceased donor liver transplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.肝癌在活体和尸体供肝肝移植后复发:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2019 Jul 5;132(13):1599-1609. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000000287.

100 篇糖尿病研究高被引系统评价/荟萃分析。

The 100 Top-Cited Systematic Reviews/Meta-Analyses on Diabetic Research.

机构信息

Department of Periodical Press and National Clinical Research Center for Geriatrics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041 Sichuan, China.

Department of Clinical Medicine, Gansu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou 730020, China.

出版信息

J Diabetes Res. 2020 Sep 11;2020:5767582. doi: 10.1155/2020/5767582. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.1155/2020/5767582
PMID:33005691
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7509559/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to analyze the 100 top-cited systematic reviews/meta-analyses on diabetic research.

METHODS

The Science Citation Index Expanded database was searched to identify top-cited studies on diabetic research up to March 4, 2020. Studies were analyzed using the following characteristics: citation number, publication year, country and institution of origin, authorship, topics, and journals.

RESULTS

The 100 top-cited diabetic systematic reviews/meta-analyses were published in 43 different journals, with having the highest numbers ( = 17), followed by ( = 14) and ( = 9). The majority of studies are published in the 2000s. The number of citations ranged from 2197 to 301. The highest number of contributions was from the USA, followed by England and Australia. The leading institution was Harvard University. The hot topic was a risk factor ( = 33), followed by comorbidity ( = 27).

CONCLUSIONS

The 100 top-cited systematic reviews/meta-analyses on diabetic research identify impactful authors, journals, institutes, and countries. It will also provide the most important references to evidence-based medicine in diabetes and serve as a guide to the features of a citable paper in this field.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在分析糖尿病研究领域的 100 篇高被引系统评价/荟萃分析。

方法

检索科学引文索引扩展数据库,以确定截至 2020 年 3 月 4 日的糖尿病研究高被引研究。使用以下特征分析研究:引用数量、出版年份、来源国家和机构、作者、主题和期刊。

结果

100 篇高被引糖尿病系统评价/荟萃分析发表在 43 种不同的期刊上,其中《Diabetes Care》(= 17)最高,其次是《Diabetes》(= 14)和《JAMA》(= 9)。大多数研究发表于 21 世纪。引用数量从 2197 到 301 不等。贡献最多的国家是美国,其次是英国和澳大利亚。领先的机构是哈佛大学。热门主题是风险因素(= 33),其次是合并症(= 27)。

结论

糖尿病研究的 100 篇高被引系统评价/荟萃分析确定了有影响力的作者、期刊、机构和国家。它还将为糖尿病循证医学提供最重要的参考文献,并作为该领域有影响力论文特征的指南。