Hussein Wael F, Gomez Norma, Sun Sumi J, Yu Junhua, Yang Fang, Ajuria Michael, Abra Graham E, Schiller Brigitte
Satellite Healthcare, 300 Santana Row, Suite 300, San Jose, California, USA.
Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, USA.
Hemodial Int. 2021 Jan;25(1):20-28. doi: 10.1111/hdi.12880. Epub 2020 Oct 1.
Central venous catheters (CVC) are a major contributor to infections in hemodialysis (HD) patients, leading to high morbidity and mortality. Gentamicin-citrate (GC) lock is used as standard of care at centers belonging to a mid-size dialysis organization. Four outpatient HD centers acquired by the organization continued to use heparin for catheter locks for a period of time before converting to the provider's standard of using GC lock.
In this retrospective observational study, we included patients receiving HD by CVC at these four centers. We report rates of CVC-related bloodstream infections (CVC-BSI) during the heparin lock and the GC lock periods; crude rate ratios and adjusted rate ratios using Cox survival analyses adjusting for potential confounders; microbiology patterns; safety signals (gentamicin resistance, hospitalizations and deaths); and financial impact on payer.
A total of 220 and 281 patients used tunneled CVCs, accounting for 25,245 and 44,550 catheter days in the heparin and the GC lock periods, respectively. CVC-BSI event rates were 66% lower in the GC lock period (CVC-BSI event rate: 0.20 per 1000 catheter-days) than the heparin lock period (rate: 0.59 per 1000 catheter days); rate ratio 0.34 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.15-0.78, P = 0.01). In the fully adjusted multivariable Cox model, use of GC lock was associated with 70% reduction in CVC-BSI events (HR 0.30, 95% CI 0.12-0.72, P = 0.01). No increased risk of gentamicin resistance, hospitalizations, or death associated with use of GC lock were observed. Use of GC lock was associated with an estimated saving of $1533 (95% CI: $259-$4882) per patient per year.
Use of GC lock led to significant reductions in CVC-BSIs with no signal for harm, and is associated with significant cost savings in dialysis care.
中心静脉导管(CVC)是血液透析(HD)患者感染的主要原因,会导致高发病率和死亡率。庆大霉素柠檬酸盐(GC)封管在一家中型透析机构所属的中心被用作护理标准。该机构收购的四家门诊血液透析中心在转换为使用GC封管的供应商标准之前,有一段时间继续使用肝素进行导管封管。
在这项回顾性观察研究中,我们纳入了在这四个中心接受CVC血液透析的患者。我们报告了肝素封管期和GC封管期与CVC相关的血流感染(CVC-BSI)发生率;使用Cox生存分析调整潜在混杂因素后的粗率比和调整率比;微生物学模式;安全信号(庆大霉素耐药性、住院和死亡);以及对付款人的财务影响。
共有220名和281名患者使用了带隧道的CVC,在肝素封管期和GC封管期分别占25245和44550个导管日。GC封管期的CVC-BSI事件发生率(每1000个导管日0.20)比肝素封管期(每1000个导管日0.59)低66%;率比为0.34(95%置信区间(CI)0.15 - 0.78,P = 0.01)。在完全调整的多变量Cox模型中,使用GC封管与CVC-BSI事件减少70%相关(风险比0.30,95% CI 0.12 - 0.72,P = 0.01)。未观察到与使用GC封管相关的庆大霉素耐药性、住院或死亡风险增加。使用GC封管估计每位患者每年节省1533美元(95% CI:259 - 4882美元)。
使用GC封管可显著降低CVC-BSI,且无有害信号,并且与透析护理中的显著成本节约相关。