Archibald Mandy M, Lawless Michael T, Ambagtsheer Rachel C, Kitson Alison L
College of Nursing, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences , University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA 5042 Australia.
Age Ageing. 2021 Jan 8;50(1):227-232. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afaa187.
despite growing support for the clinical application of frailty, including regular frailty screening for older adults, little is known about how older adults perceive frailty screening. The purpose of this study was to examine older adults' perspectives on frailty screening to inform knowledge translation and service improvements for older adults with frailty.
interpretive descriptive qualitative design.
a total of 39 non-frail (18%), pre-frail (33%) and frail or very frail (49%) South Australian older adults aged 62-99 years, sampled from community, assisted living and residential aged care settings.
seven focus groups were conducted and analysed by two independent investigators using inductive thematic analysis.
three themes were identified. First, older adults question the necessity and logic of an objective frailty measure. Second, older adults believe any efforts at frailty screening need to culminate in an action. Third, older adults emphasise that frailty screening needs to be conducted sensitively given negative perceptions of the term frailty and the potential adverse effects of frailty labelling.
previous screening experiences and underlying beliefs about the nature of frailty as inevitable shaped openness to, and acceptance of, frailty screening. Findings correspond with previous research illuminating the lack of public awareness of frailty and the nascent stage of frailty screening implementation. Incorporating consumer perspectives, along with perspectives of other stakeholder groups when considering implementing frailty screening, is likely to impact uptake and optimise suitability-important considerations in person-centred care provision.
尽管对衰弱的临床应用支持日益增加,包括对老年人进行定期衰弱筛查,但对于老年人如何看待衰弱筛查却知之甚少。本研究的目的是探讨老年人对衰弱筛查的看法,以为衰弱老年人的知识转化和服务改进提供参考。
解释性描述性定性设计。
从社区、辅助生活和老年住宅护理机构中抽取了39名南澳大利亚州62至99岁的老年人,其中非衰弱者(18%)、衰弱前期者(33%)以及衰弱或非常衰弱者(49%)。
开展了7个焦点小组讨论,并由两名独立研究人员采用归纳主题分析法进行分析。
确定了三个主题。第一,老年人质疑客观衰弱测量的必要性和逻辑性。第二,老年人认为衰弱筛查的任何努力都需要以行动为最终目标。第三,老年人强调,鉴于对衰弱一词的负面看法以及衰弱标签的潜在不利影响,衰弱筛查需要以敏感的方式进行。
以前的筛查经历以及对衰弱本质不可避免的潜在信念影响了对衰弱筛查的接受程度。研究结果与之前关于公众对衰弱缺乏认识以及衰弱筛查实施尚处于初期阶段的研究相符。在考虑实施衰弱筛查时,纳入消费者的观点以及其他利益相关者群体的观点,可能会影响接受程度并优化适用性,这是以人为本的护理提供中的重要考虑因素。