University of Canterbury, Private Bag 4800, Christchurch 8140, New Zealand.
University of Canterbury, Private Bag 4800, Christchurch 8140, New Zealand.
J Magn Reson. 2020 Nov;320:106826. doi: 10.1016/j.jmr.2020.106826. Epub 2020 Sep 9.
This paper investigates the use of benchtop NMR spectrometers for quantitative analysis with external standards. Specifically, it focuses on the measurement of aqueous samples with analyte concentrations ranging from 30 mM to 1.7 M and electrical conductivity of up to 84mScm using a 43 MHz instrument. It is demonstrated that measurements using the PULCON method cannot achieve an average error in quantification of <4% with the benchtop NMR tested here unless the standard and analyte are very similar. Our analysis indicates that this comparatively large error arises from the fixed tuning and matching of the benchtop spectrometer. We confirm that for moderately dilute samples (less than 0.2 M), the integral area of the solvent peak is suitable for use as an internal standard to mitigate this error. Furthermore, a round robin study demonstrates that the second major source of uncertainty in these measurements arises from the manual processing of the spectra by different analysts. Here we propose heuristics for manual baseline and phase correction to reduce this analyst-dependent error to about 3 %. We also demonstrate that semi-automated quantification using qGSD is able to achieve similar accuracy of integration, but with reduced sensitivity to the processing of the operator.
本文研究了使用台式 NMR 光谱仪进行外标定量分析。具体来说,研究聚焦于使用 43MHz 仪器测量浓度范围为 30mM 至 1.7M、电导率高达 84mScm 的水溶液样品。结果表明,除非标准品和分析物非常相似,否则使用本文所测试的台式 NMR 进行的 PULCON 方法测量无法实现平均定量误差<4%。我们的分析表明,这种相对较大的误差源于台式光谱仪的固定调谐和匹配。我们确认,对于中等稀释样品(小于 0.2M),溶剂峰的积分面积适合用作内标以减轻此误差。此外,一项轮次研究表明,这些测量中第二个主要的不确定度来源是不同分析人员手动处理光谱。在这里,我们提出了手动基线和相位校正的启发式方法,将这种依赖于分析人员的误差降低到约 3%。我们还证明,使用 qGSD 进行半自动定量能够实现类似的积分准确性,但对操作人员处理的敏感性降低。