Martens Roland M, Stappen Ruud van der, Koopman Thomas, Noij Daniel P, Comans Emile F, Zwezerijnen Gerben J, Vergeer Marije R, Leemans C René, de Bree Remco, Boellaard Ronald, Castelijns Jonas A, de Graaf Pim
Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Cancers (Basel). 2020 Sep 30;12(10):2826. doi: 10.3390/cancers12102826.
To evaluate diagnostic accuracy of qualitative analysis and interobserver agreement of single ultrafast-DCE, DWI or F-FDG-PET and the combination of modalities for the detection of unknown primary tumor (UPT) in patients presenting with cervical lymph node metastasis from squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Between 2014-2019, patients with histologically proven cervical lymph node metastasis of UPT SCC were prospectively included and underwent DWI, ultrafast-DCE, and F-FDG-PET/CT. Qualitative assessment was performed by two observers per modality. Interobserver agreement was calculated using the proportion specific agreement. Diagnostic accuracy of combined use of DWI, ultrafast-DCE and F-FDG-PET/CT was assessed. Twenty-nine patients were included (20 males. [68%], median age 60 years). Nine (31%) primary tumors remained occult. Ultrafast-DCE added reader confidence for suspicious locations (one additional true positive (5%), 2 decisive true malignant (10%). The per-location analysis showed highest specific positive agreement for ultrafast-DCE (77.6%). The per-location rating showed highest sensitivity (95%, 95%CI = 75.1-99.9, YI = 0.814) when either one of all modalities was scored positive, and 97.4% (95%CI = 93.5-99.3, YI = 0.774) specificity when co-detected on all. The per-patient analysis showed highest sensitivity (100%) for F-FDG-PET/CT (YI = 0.222) and either DWI or PET (YI = 0.111). Despite highest trends, no significant differences were found. The per-patient analysis showed highest specific positive agreement when co-detected on all modalities (55.6%, 95%CI = 21.2-86.3, YI = 0.456). Ultrafast-DCE showed potential to improve detection of unknown primary tumors in addition to DWI and F-FDG-PET/CT in patients with cervical squamous cell carcinoma lymph node metastasis. The combined use of ultrafast-DCE, DWI and F-FDG-PET/CT yielded highest sensitivity.
为评估定性分析的诊断准确性以及单一超快动态对比增强(ultrafast-DCE)、扩散加权成像(DWI)或氟代脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层扫描(F-FDG-PET)及联合检查方式在检测鳞状细胞癌(SCC)颈部淋巴结转移患者中未知原发肿瘤(UPT)时的观察者间一致性。2014年至2019年,前瞻性纳入组织学证实为UPT SCC颈部淋巴结转移的患者,并对其进行DWI、超快-DCE和F-FDG-PET/CT检查。每种检查方式由两名观察者进行定性评估。使用比例特异性一致性计算观察者间一致性。评估DWI、超快-DCE和F-FDG-PET/CT联合使用的诊断准确性。共纳入29例患者(20例男性,[68%],中位年龄60岁)。9例(31%)原发肿瘤仍隐匿。超快-DCE增加了对可疑部位的阅片信心(1例额外真阳性(5%),2例决定性真恶性(10%))。按部位分析显示超快-DCE的特异性阳性一致性最高(77.6%)。当所有检查方式中任何一项为阳性时,按部位评分显示敏感性最高(95%,95%CI = 75.1 - 99.9,YI = 0.814),当所有检查方式共同检测到阳性时,特异性为97.4%(95%CI = 93.5 - 99.3,YI = 0.774)。按患者分析显示F-FDG-PET/CT的敏感性最高(100%)(YI = 0.222),DWI或PET的敏感性最高(YI = 0.111)。尽管趋势最高,但未发现显著差异。按患者分析显示当所有检查方式共同检测到阳性时特异性阳性一致性最高(55.6%,95%CI = 21.2 - 86.3,YI = 0.456)。在SCC颈部淋巴结转移患者中,除DWI和F-FDG-PET/CT外,超快-DCE显示出改善未知原发肿瘤检测的潜力。超快-DCE、DWI和F-FDG-PET/CT联合使用产生最高的敏感性。