Suppr超能文献

腹侧手助腹腔镜活体供肾切除术患者接受腹直肌鞘阻滞与脊髓麻醉对出院准备时间的影响:一项随机试验。

Effect of rectus sheath block vs. spinal anaesthesia on time-to-readiness for hospital discharge after trans-peritoneal hand-assisted laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: A randomised trial.

机构信息

From the Department of Anaesthesia, Manchester Royal Infirmary (KB, RW, WM, CJ), Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Wythenshawe Hospital (MC) and Department of Transplant Surgery, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK (TC, DVD).

出版信息

Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2021 Apr 1;38(4):374-382. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000001337.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The role of spinal anaesthesia in patients having a transperitoneal hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy in an enhanced recovery setting has never been investigated.

OBJECTIVE

We explored whether substituting a rectus sheath block (RSB) with spinal anaesthesia, as an adjunct to a general anaesthetic technique, influenced time-to-readiness for discharge in patients undergoing hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy.

DESIGN

Prospective randomised open blinded end-point (PROBE) study with two parallel groups.

SETTING

Tertiary University Hospital.

PATIENTS

Ninety-seven patients undergoing a trans-peritoneal hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy.

INTERVENTION

Patients (n=52) were randomly assigned to receive a general anaesthetic and a surgical RSB with 2 mg kg-1 of levobupivacaine at the time of surgical closure or a spinal anaesthetic with hyperbaric bupivacaine 12.5 mg and diamorphine 0.5 mg (n=45) before general anaesthesia.

PRIMARY OUTCOME

The primary outcome was the time-to-readiness for discharge following surgery.

RESULTS

Median [IQR] times-to-readiness for discharge were 75 [56 to 83] and 79 [67 to 101] h for RSB and spinal anaesthesia and there was no significant difference in times-to-readiness for discharge (median difference 4 (95% CI, 0 to 20h; P  = 0.07)). There were no significant differences in pain scores at rest (P  = 0.91) or on movement (P = 0.66). Median 24-h oxycodone consumptions were similar (P  = 0.80). Nausea and vomiting scores were similar (P = 0.57) and urinary retention occurred in one vs. four patients with RSB and spinal anaesthesia, respectively (P  = 0.077).

CONCLUSION

Substitution of RSB with spinal anaesthesia using 12.5 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine and 0.5 mg diamorphine, together with a general anaesthetic failed to confer any benefit on time-to-discharge readiness following transperitoneal hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. RSB provided similar analgesia in the immediate postoperative period with a low frequency of side-effects in this cohort.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrial.gov identifier: NCT02700217.

摘要

背景

在强化康复环境下,经腹腹腔镜辅助供体肾切手中,椎管内麻醉在患者中的作用从未被研究过。

目的

我们探讨了在经腹腹腔镜辅助供体肾切手中,使用罗哌卡因行脊麻联合全身麻醉作为全身麻醉技术的辅助手段,是否会影响患者的出院准备时间。

设计

前瞻性随机开放盲终点(PROBE)研究,设有两个平行组。

地点

三级大学医院。

患者

97 例行经腹腹腔镜辅助供体肾切除术的患者。

干预

患者(n=52)随机分配,在手术关闭时接受全身麻醉和 2mg/kg 的左布比卡因外科直肠鞘阻滞,或在全身麻醉前接受 12.5mg 布比卡因和 0.5mg 吗啡的脊麻(n=45)。

主要结局

主要结局是手术结束后的出院准备时间。

结果

直肠鞘阻滞和脊麻的中位(IQR)出院准备时间分别为 75[56 至 83]和 79[67 至 101]小时,且出院准备时间无显著差异(中位差值 4(95%CI,0 至 20 小时;P=0.07))。两组患者在静息时(P=0.91)或活动时(P=0.66)的疼痛评分均无显著差异。24 小时内羟考酮消耗量相似(P=0.80)。恶心和呕吐评分相似(P=0.57),直肠鞘阻滞组和脊麻组分别有 1 例和 4 例发生尿潴留(P=0.077)。

结论

使用 12.5mg 布比卡因和 0.5mg 吗啡的脊麻替代直肠鞘阻滞,与全身麻醉联合使用,并未使经腹腹腔镜辅助供体肾切除术后的出院准备时间提前。在该队列中,直肠鞘阻滞在术后即刻提供了相似的镇痛效果,且不良反应发生率较低。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT02700217。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验