Chapron K, Sleth J-C, Capdevila X, Bringuier S, Dadure C
Department of Paediatric and Gynaecology Anaesthesia, Lapeyronie University Hospital, CHU Montpellier, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Department of Anaesthesiology, Saint-Roch Hospital, Montpellier, France.
Anaesthesia. 2021 Jun;76(6):777-784. doi: 10.1111/anae.15342. Epub 2021 Jan 11.
Hyperbaric bupivacaine spinal anaesthesia remains the gold standard for elective caesarean section, but the resultant clinical effects can be unpredictable. Hyperbaric prilocaine induces shorter motor block but has not previously been studied in the obstetric spinal anaesthesia setting. We aimed to compare duration of motor block after spinal anaesthesia with prilocaine or bupivacaine during elective caesarean section. In this prospective randomised, double-blind study, women with uncomplicated pregnancy undergoing elective caesarean section were eligible for inclusion. Exclusion criteria included: patients aged < 18 years; height < 155 cm or > 175 cm; a desire to breastfeed; or a contra-indication to spinal anaesthesia. Patients were randomly allocated to two groups: the prilocaine group underwent spinal anaesthesia with 60 mg intrathecal prilocaine; and the bupivacaine group received 12.5 mg intrathecal heavy bupivacaine. Both 2.5 µg sufentanil and 100 µg morphine were added to the local anaesthetic agent in both groups. The primary outcome was duration of motor block, which was assessed every 15 min after arriving in the post-anaesthetic care unit. Maternal haemodynamics, APGAR scores, pain scores, patient satisfaction and side-effects were recorded. Fifty patients were included, with 25 randomly allocated to each group. Median (IQR [range]) motor block duration was significantly shorter in the prilocaine group, 158 (125-188 [95-249]) vs. 220 (189-250 [89-302]) min, p < 0.001. Median length of stay in the post-anaesthetic care unit was significantly shorter in the prilocaine group, 135 (120-180 [120-230]) vs. 180 (150-195 [120-240]) min, p = 0.009. There was no difference between groups for: maternal intra-operative hypotension; APGAR score; umbilical cord blood pH; maternal postoperative pain; and patients' or obstetricians' satisfaction. We conclude that hyperbaric prilocaine induces a shorter and more reliable motor block than hyperbaric bupivacaine for women with uncomplicated pregnancy undergoing elective caesarean section.
高压布比卡因腰麻仍是择期剖宫产的金标准,但由此产生的临床效果可能难以预测。高压丙胺卡因诱导的运动阻滞时间较短,但此前尚未在产科腰麻环境中进行研究。我们旨在比较择期剖宫产时丙胺卡因或布比卡因腰麻后的运动阻滞持续时间。在这项前瞻性随机双盲研究中,接受择期剖宫产的无并发症妊娠女性符合纳入标准。排除标准包括:年龄<18岁的患者;身高<155cm或>175cm;有母乳喂养意愿;或有腰麻禁忌证。患者被随机分为两组:丙胺卡因组接受鞘内注射60mg丙胺卡因进行腰麻;布比卡因组接受鞘内注射12.5mg重比重布比卡因。两组均在局部麻醉剂中加入2.5μg舒芬太尼和100μg吗啡。主要结局是运动阻滞持续时间,在进入麻醉后护理单元后每隔15分钟进行评估。记录产妇血流动力学、阿氏评分、疼痛评分、患者满意度和副作用。共纳入50例患者,每组随机分配25例。丙胺卡因组的运动阻滞持续时间中位数(IQR[范围])明显较短,为158(125 - 188[95 - 249])分钟,而布比卡因组为220(189 - 250[89 - 302])分钟,p<0.001。丙胺卡因组在麻醉后护理单元的住院时间中位数明显较短,为135(120 - 180[120 - 230])分钟,而布比卡因组为180(150 - 195[120 - 240])分钟,p = 0.009。两组在以下方面无差异:产妇术中低血压;阿氏评分;脐血pH值;产妇术后疼痛;以及患者或产科医生的满意度。我们得出结论,对于接受择期剖宫产的无并发症妊娠女性,高压丙胺卡因比高压布比卡因诱导的运动阻滞更短且更可靠。