• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

板层黄斑裂孔与视网膜内界膜黄斑裂孔对比研究。

Comparison of vitreoretinal disorders in fellow eyes of lamellar macular holes versus epiretinal membrane foveoschisis.

机构信息

Retina Division, Stein Eye Institute, University of California Los Angeles, 100 Stein Plaza, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Ophthalmology Department, Université de Paris, AP-HP, Hôpital Lariboisière, F-75010, Paris, France.

出版信息

Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2020 Dec;258(12):2611-2619. doi: 10.1007/s00417-020-04950-y. Epub 2020 Oct 3.

DOI:10.1007/s00417-020-04950-y
PMID:33009974
Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate and compare the rate and characteristics of vitreoretinal disorders in fellow eyes of lamellar macular holes (LMH) versus epiretinal membrane foveoschisis (ERMF).

METHODS

Included patients in this retrospective study were divided into two groups based on spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) features of their primary eye: LMH (group A) and ERMF (group B).

RESULTS

Ninety-four patients were enrolled: 59 (62.8%) in group A and 35 (37.2%) in group B. Fellow eyes in group A had a higher rate of retinal detachment (8/59 [13.6%] vs. 0/35 [0%], P = 0.024), and full-thickness macular hole (FTMH) (11/59 [18.6%] vs. 2/35 [5.7%], P = 0.079), compared with fellow eyes in group B. In group A, 4/59 patients (6.8%) showed a bilateral LMH while none from group B had a LMH in their fellow eye (0/35 [0%]), P = 0.293. Additionally, epiretinal proliferation was noted in 30/59 (50.8%) fellow eyes in group A versus 3/35 (8.6%) fellow eyes in group B, P < 0.001. Longitudinal data were available for 80/94 patients. Over a mean follow-up of 37.4 ± 29.9 months, 1/48 (2.1%) fellow eyes from group A developed a FTMH and 2/48 (4.2%) developed a LMH, while no FTMH or LMH occurred in fellow eyes of group B.

CONCLUSIONS

Fellow eyes of LMH showed a high rate of macular and peripheral vitreoretinal disorders. In addition, epiretinal proliferation was detected in a higher number of fellow eyes of LMH versus ERMF. These findings suggest a bilateral process in eyes of patients with LMH.

摘要

目的

评估并比较板层黄斑裂孔(LMH)和视网膜内界膜黄斑裂孔(ERM)对患眼玻璃体积视网膜病变的发生率和特征。

方法

本回顾性研究根据原发性眼的谱域光学相干断层扫描(SD-OCT)特征将患者分为两组:LMH(A 组)和 ERM(B 组)。

结果

共纳入 94 例患者:A 组 59 例(62.8%),B 组 35 例(37.2%)。A 组患眼视网膜脱离的发生率较高(8/59 [13.6%] vs. 0/35 [0%],P=0.024),全层黄斑裂孔(FTMH)的发生率也较高(11/59 [18.6%] vs. 2/35 [5.7%],P=0.079)。与 B 组相比,A 组 4/59 例(6.8%)患者双侧 LMH,而 B 组无患眼 LMH(0/35 [0%]),P=0.293。此外,A 组 59 例患眼中有 30 例(50.8%)存在视网膜内增殖,而 B 组 35 例患眼中有 3 例(8.6%),P<0.001。94 例患者中有 80 例可获得纵向数据。在平均 37.4±29.9 个月的随访中,A 组的 48 例患眼中有 1 例(2.1%)发生 FTMH,2 例(4.2%)发生 LMH,而 B 组的 48 例患眼中无 FTMH 或 LMH 发生。

结论

LMH 的患眼表现出较高的黄斑和周边玻璃体积视网膜病变发生率。此外,与 ERM 相比,LMH 患眼的视网膜内增殖发生率更高。这些发现表明 LMH 患者的双眼存在双侧病变过程。

相似文献

1
Comparison of vitreoretinal disorders in fellow eyes of lamellar macular holes versus epiretinal membrane foveoschisis.板层黄斑裂孔与视网膜内界膜黄斑裂孔对比研究。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2020 Dec;258(12):2611-2619. doi: 10.1007/s00417-020-04950-y. Epub 2020 Oct 3.
2
Long-term follow-up of fellow eye in patients with lamellar macular hole.板层黄斑裂孔患者对侧眼的长期随访
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2017 Aug;255(8):1485-1492. doi: 10.1007/s00417-017-3652-7. Epub 2017 Apr 13.
3
In-Depth Analysis of Preoperative OCT Markers as Prognostic Factors for Lamellar Macular Holes and Epiretinal Membrane Foveoschisis.术前 OCT 标志物对板层黄斑裂孔和视网膜前膜黄斑裂孔的预后分析。
Ophthalmol Retina. 2024 May;8(5):465-472. doi: 10.1016/j.oret.2023.10.025. Epub 2023 Nov 14.
4
Fluorescein Angiography Findings in Eyes With Lamellar Macular Hole and Epiretinal Membrane Foveoschisis.板层黄斑裂孔伴视网膜内界膜黄斑前膜裂孔的荧光素血管造影表现。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2021 Jan 4;62(1):34. doi: 10.1167/iovs.62.1.34.
5
Functional and morphological outcomes after surgery in lamellar macular holes versus epiretinal membrane foveoschisis.板层黄斑裂孔与视网膜内界膜黄斑劈裂手术后的功能和形态学结果。
Eur J Ophthalmol. 2021 Nov;31(6):3294-3299. doi: 10.1177/1120672120974287. Epub 2020 Nov 27.
6
Epiretinal proliferation seen in association with lamellar macular holes: a distinct clinical entity.视网膜前增殖与板层黄斑裂孔相关:一种独特的临床实体。
Retina. 2014 Aug;34(8):1513-23. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000000163.
7
Progression of lamellar hole-associated epiretinal proliferation and retinal changes during long-term follow-up.长期随访期间板层孔相关视网膜前增殖和视网膜变化的进展
Br J Ophthalmol. 2018 Jan;102(1):84-90. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2016-310128. Epub 2017 May 25.
8
[Morphology of the vitreoretinal interface in fellow eyes of patients with full thickness macular holes].[全层黄斑裂孔患者对侧眼的玻璃体视网膜界面形态学]
Ophthalmologe. 2018 Dec;115(12):1050-1055. doi: 10.1007/s00347-017-0614-8.
9
Surgical outcomes of lamellar macular holes with and without lamellar hole-associated epiretinal proliferation.伴有和不伴有板层裂孔相关视网膜前增殖的板层黄斑裂孔的手术结果
Acta Ophthalmol. 2017 May;95(3):e221-e226. doi: 10.1111/aos.13245. Epub 2016 Sep 20.
10
Comparing functional and morphologic characteristics of lamellar macular holes with and without lamellar hole-associated epiretinal proliferation.比较伴有和不伴有黄斑裂孔相关视网膜前增殖的板层黄斑裂孔的功能和形态学特征。
Retina. 2015 Apr;35(4):720-6. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000000390.

引用本文的文献

1
Outcomes of Pars Plana Vitrectomy With Membrane Peel for Lamellar Macular Holes and Related Conditions Using a New Optical Coherence Tomography Consensus Definition.使用新的光学相干断层扫描共识定义,经膜剥除的玻璃体切除术治疗板层黄斑裂孔及相关病症的结果
J Vitreoretin Dis. 2023 Dec 24;8(2):125-130. doi: 10.1177/24741264231218054. eCollection 2024 Mar-Apr.

本文引用的文献

1
Lamellar macular hole: a complication of cystoid macular edema after cataract extraction: a clinicopathologic case report.板层黄斑裂孔:白内障摘除术后囊样黄斑水肿的一种并发症:一例临床病理病例报告
Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1975;73:231-50.