From, HCA Healthcare.
the, Section of Trauma, Riverside Community Hospital, Riverside, CA, USA.
Acad Emerg Med. 2021 Mar;28(3):292-299. doi: 10.1111/acem.14145. Epub 2020 Oct 28.
Previous literature demonstrates increased mortality for traumatic brain injury (TBI) with transfer to a Level II versus Level I trauma center. Our objective was to determine the effect of the most recent American College of Surgeons-Committee on Trauma (ACS-COT) "Resources for the Optimal Care of the Injured Patient" resources manual ("The Orange Book") on outcomes after severe TBI after interfacility transfer to Level I versus Level II center.
Utilizing the Trauma Quality Program Participant Use File of the American College of Surgeons admission year 2017, we identified patients with isolated TBI undergoing interfacility transfer to either Level I or Level II trauma center. Logistic regression was performed to determine independent associations with mortality.
There were 10,268 (71.6%) transferred to a Level I center and 4,025 (28.4%) were transferred to a Level II center. They were mostly male (61.4%) with a mean ± SD age of 61 ± 20.8 years. Mean Injury Severity Score was 16.3 ± 6.3 and most were injured in a single-level fall (51.5%). Patients transferred to a Level I center were less likely to be White (82.3% vs. 84.7%, 0.002) and more likely to have sustained penetrating trauma (2.7% vs. 1.6%, <0.001). The incidence of severe TBI (Glasgow Coma Scale [GCS] = 3-8) was similar (9.3% vs. 8.3%, 0.068). On logistic regression, severity of TBI predicted death; however, there was no difference in adjusted mortality outcome with admission to a Level II versus a Level I center (0.998 [0.836-1.192], 0.985).
There is no mortality discrepancy in patients with isolated TBI transferred to a Level II versus Level I center despite previous contrary evidence and thus no reason to bypass a Level II in favor of a Level I. This relative improvement potentially relates to the new requirements as defined in the latest version of the ACS-COT's resources manual.
既往文献表明,与转运至一级创伤中心相比,创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者转运至二级创伤中心的死亡率更高。我们的目的是确定最近的美国外科医师学院-创伤委员会(ACS-COT)“创伤患者最佳治疗资源”手册(“橙色手册”)对严重 TBI 患者在转入一级和二级创伤中心后的影响。
利用美国外科医师学院 2017 年入院年份的创伤质量计划参与者使用文件,我们确定了接受院内转运至一级或二级创伤中心的孤立性 TBI 患者。采用 logistic 回归分析确定死亡率的独立相关因素。
10268 例(71.6%)患者转运至一级中心,4025 例(28.4%)患者转运至二级中心。患者主要为男性(61.4%),平均年龄为 61 ± 20.8 岁。平均损伤严重度评分(ISS)为 16.3 ± 6.3,大多数为单级坠落伤(51.5%)。转运至一级中心的患者中,白人比例较低(82.3% vs. 84.7%,0.002),穿透性创伤比例较高(2.7% vs. 1.6%,<0.001)。严重 TBI 发生率(格拉斯哥昏迷量表[GCS]评分 3-8)相似(9.3% vs. 8.3%,0.068)。logistic 回归分析显示,TBI 严重程度与死亡率相关,但与二级 vs. 一级中心入院相比,调整后的死亡率无差异(0.998 [0.836-1.192],0.985)。
尽管既往有相反的证据,但与转运至一级创伤中心相比,转运至二级创伤中心的孤立性 TBI 患者死亡率并无差异,因此没有理由绕过二级创伤中心而选择一级创伤中心。这种相对改善可能与 ACS-COT 最新版本资源手册中定义的新要求有关。