• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

血液系统恶性肿瘤患者生育力保存的卵巢刺激反应。

Ovarian response to stimulation for fertility preservation in women with hematologic cancer.

机构信息

CHU Rennes, Département de Gynécologie Obstétrique et Reproduction Humaine, F-35033, Rennes, France.

CHU Rennes, Département de Gynécologie Obstétrique et Reproduction Humaine, F-35033, Rennes, France.

出版信息

J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2021 May;50(5):101925. doi: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2020.101925. Epub 2020 Sep 30.

DOI:10.1016/j.jogoh.2020.101925
PMID:33010467
Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the ovarian response to controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) in patients with hematologic malignancies treated for fertility preservation (FP) and healthy subjects (oocyte donors (OD)).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Retrospective cohort study comparing 41 women (18-37 years) who underwent COH for oocyte vitrification prior to gonadotoxic treatment for hematologic cancer (FP group) from January 2014 to February 2019 and with 117 women undergoing COH as part of an OD protocol (OD group) during the same period. The number of frozen mature oocytes, number of oocytes retrieved, total dose of rFSH, maximal estradiol levels, percentage of maturity, number of dominant follicles >14 mm, days of stimulation were evaluated. Results were adjusted for age, body mass index (BMI), anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) and rFSH starting dose.

RESULTS

Patients in the FP group were younger and had a lower BMI than those in the OD group. rFSH starting dose was higher in the FP group (median 225UI (125;450) vs 150UI (87.5;337.5), p < 0.0001). After adjusting for age, BMI and starting rFSH dose according to ANCOVA, more frozen mature oocytes (median 10 (0;45) vs 8 (0;22] p = 0.0055) and retrieved oocytes (median 12 (0;49) vs 11 (0;29) p = 0.0468) were found in the FP group. Other outcome measures did not differ between the groups.

CONCLUSION

Ovarian response after COH in women with a hematologic cancer is similar to that in the general population. A higher number of mature oocytes were collected in the FP group after strong COH.

摘要

目的

比较血液恶性肿瘤患者行生育力保存(FP)控制性卵巢刺激(COH)与健康供卵者(OD)的卵巢反应。

方法

回顾性队列研究比较了 2014 年 1 月至 2019 年 2 月期间因血液恶性肿瘤接受性腺毒性治疗前进行卵母细胞玻璃化冷冻保存而接受 COH 的 41 例(18-37 岁)女性(FP 组)和同期行 COH 作为 OD 方案一部分的 117 例女性(OD 组)。比较两组的冷冻成熟卵母细胞数、获卵数、rFSH 总剂量、最大雌二醇水平、成熟率、>14mm 的优势卵泡数和刺激天数。结果根据年龄、体重指数(BMI)、抗苗勒管激素(AMH)和 rFSH 起始剂量进行调整。

结果

FP 组患者年龄较小,BMI 较低。FP 组 rFSH 起始剂量较高(中位数 225UI(125;450)比 150UI(87.5;337.5),p<0.0001)。根据协方差分析调整年龄、BMI 和起始 rFSH 剂量后,FP 组的冷冻成熟卵母细胞数(中位数 10(0;45)比 8(0;22),p=0.0055)和获卵数(中位数 12(0;49)比 11(0;29),p=0.0468)更多。其他结果指标在两组之间无差异。

结论

血液恶性肿瘤患者 COH 后的卵巢反应与普通人群相似。在强烈的 COH 后,FP 组采集到的成熟卵母细胞数量更多。

相似文献

1
Ovarian response to stimulation for fertility preservation in women with hematologic cancer.血液系统恶性肿瘤患者生育力保存的卵巢刺激反应。
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2021 May;50(5):101925. doi: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2020.101925. Epub 2020 Sep 30.
2
Response to ovarian stimulation in patients facing gonadotoxic therapy.面对性腺毒性治疗的患者的卵巢刺激反应。
Reprod Biomed Online. 2013 Apr;26(4):337-44. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2013.01.003. Epub 2013 Jan 19.
3
Effects of cancer on ovarian response in controlled ovarian stimulation for fertility preservation.癌症对控制性卵巢刺激中卵巢反应的影响及其在生育力保存中的作用。
Fertil Steril. 2012 Oct;98(4):957-60. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.06.007. Epub 2012 Jul 2.
4
Ovarian tissue cryopreservation can be combined simultaneously with oocyte retrieval after controlled ovarian hyperstimulation.在控制性卵巢刺激后,卵巢组织冷冻保存可与卵母细胞采集同时进行。
Hum Reprod. 2023 May 2;38(5):860-871. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dead041.
5
Ovarian reserve and response to stimulation in women undergoing fertility preservation according to malignancy type.根据恶性肿瘤类型,探讨接受生育力保存的女性的卵巢储备和刺激反应。
Reprod Biomed Online. 2018 Aug;37(2):201-207. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2018.04.047. Epub 2018 May 2.
6
Comparison of Oocyte and Embryo Quality Between Random Start and Controlled Ovarian Stimulation Cycles in Cancer Patients Undergoing Fertility Preservation.癌症患者生育力保存中随机启动与控制性卵巢刺激周期的卵母细胞和胚胎质量比较
Reprod Sci. 2021 Aug;28(8):2200-2207. doi: 10.1007/s43032-020-00412-2. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
7
Ovarian stimulation is a safe and effective fertility preservation option in the adolescent and young adult population.卵巢刺激是青少年和年轻成年人群体中安全有效的生育力保存选择。
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2020 Mar;37(3):699-708. doi: 10.1007/s10815-019-01639-y. Epub 2019 Dec 11.
8
Antral follicle responsiveness to FSH, assessed by the follicular output rate (FORT), is altered in Hodgkin's lymphoma when compared with breast cancer candidates for fertility preservation.与乳腺癌生育力保存候选者相比,霍奇金淋巴瘤患者的窦卵泡对促卵泡激素(FSH)的反应性(通过卵泡排出率(FORT)评估)发生了改变。
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2018 Jan;35(1):91-97. doi: 10.1007/s10815-017-1059-3. Epub 2017 Oct 6.
9
Effects of cancer stage and grade on fertility preservation outcome and ovarian stimulation response.癌症分期和分级对生育力保存结果和卵巢刺激反应的影响。
Hum Reprod. 2019 Mar 1;34(3):530-538. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dey382.
10
Fertility preservation after gonadotoxic treatments for cancer and autoimmune diseases.癌症和自身免疫性疾病的性腺毒性治疗后的生育力保存。
J Ovarian Res. 2023 Aug 10;16(1):159. doi: 10.1186/s13048-023-01250-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Outcomes after assisted reproductive technology in women with cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.癌症女性接受辅助生殖技术后的结局:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Hum Reprod. 2023 Jan 5;38(1):30-45. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deac235.