Desjobert Edouard, Tea Victoria, Schiele François, Ferrières Jean, Simon Tabassome, Danchin Nicolas, Puymirat Etienne
Department of cardiology, hôpital européen Georges-Pompidou (HEGP), AP-HP, 75015 Paris, France; Université de Paris, 75006 Paris, France.
Department of cardiology, university hospital Jean-Minjoz, 25000 Besançon, France.
Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2021 Feb;114(2):88-95. doi: 10.1016/j.acvd.2020.06.003. Epub 2020 Sep 30.
Current guidelines strongly recommend high-intensity statin therapy after acute myocardial infarction.
To analyse the relationship between prescription of high-intensity statin therapy at discharge and long-term clinical outcomes according to risk level defined by the Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction Risk Score for Secondary Prevention (TRS-2P) after acute myocardial infarction.
We used data from the FAST-MI 2005 and 2010 registries - two nationwide French surveys including 7839 consecutive patients with acute myocardial infarction. Level of risk was stratified in three groups using the TRS-2P score: Group 1 (low risk; TRS-2P=0-1); Group 2 (intermediate risk; TRS-2P=2); and Group 3 (high risk; TRS-2P≥3).
Among the 7348 patients discharged alive with a TRS-2P available, high-intensity statin therapy was used in 41.3% in Group 1, 31.3% in Group 2 and 18.5% in Group 3. After multivariable adjustment, high-intensity statin therapy was associated with a non-significant decrease in major adverse cardiovascular events (death, stroke or recurrent myocardial infarction) at 5 years in the overall population compared with that in patients receiving intermediate- or low-intensity statins or without a statin prescription (14.3% vs 29.6%; hazard ratio 0.94, 95% confidence interval 0.81-1.09; P=0.42). In absolute terms, the decrease in major adverse cardiovascular events was positively correlated with risk level (Group 1: 8.1% vs 10.7%; Group 2: 14.8% vs 21.6%; Group 3: 30.8% vs 51.6%). However, after adjustment, the benefits of high-intensity statin therapy were associated with lower mortality only in high-risk patients (hazard ratio 0.79, 95% confidence interval 0.64-0.97; P=0.02).
High-intensity statin therapy at discharge after acute myocardial infarction was associated in absolute terms with fewer major adverse cardiovascular events at 5 years, regardless of atherothrombotic risk stratification, although the highest absolute reduction was found in the high-risk TRS-2P class.
当前指南强烈推荐急性心肌梗死后进行高强度他汀类药物治疗。
根据急性心肌梗死后二级预防的心肌梗死溶栓风险评分(TRS - 2P)所定义的风险水平,分析出院时高强度他汀类药物治疗的处方与长期临床结局之间的关系。
我们使用了FAST - MI 2005和2010注册研究的数据——两项法国全国性调查,纳入了7839例连续的急性心肌梗死患者。使用TRS - 2P评分将风险水平分为三组:第1组(低风险;TRS - 2P = 0 - 1);第2组(中度风险;TRS - 2P = 2);第3组(高风险;TRS - 2P≥3)。
在7348例存活出院且有TRS - 2P数据的患者中,第1组41.3%、第2组31.3%、第3组18.5%的患者接受了高强度他汀类药物治疗。多变量调整后,与接受中度或低强度他汀类药物治疗或未开具他汀类药物处方的患者相比,总体人群中高强度他汀类药物治疗在5年时主要不良心血管事件(死亡、中风或复发性心肌梗死)的发生率无显著降低(14.3%对29.6%;风险比0.94,95%置信区间0.81 - 1.09;P = 0.42)。从绝对值来看,主要不良心血管事件的减少与风险水平呈正相关(第1组:8.1%对10.7%;第2组:14.8%对21.6%;第3组:30.8%对51.6%)。然而,调整后,高强度他汀类药物治疗的益处仅在高风险患者中与较低死亡率相关(风险比0.79,95%置信区间0.64 - 0.97;P = 0.02)。
急性心肌梗死后出院时的高强度他汀类药物治疗,无论动脉粥样硬化血栓形成风险分层如何,从绝对值来看,在5年时与较少的主要不良心血管事件相关,尽管在高风险TRS - 2P类别中绝对降低幅度最大。