Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Medical Statistics Team, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, United Kingdom.
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2021 Feb;9(2):890-896. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2020.09.026. Epub 2020 Oct 1.
Patients' peak inspiratory flow rate (PIFR) may help clinicians select an inhaler device.
To determine the proportion of patients with asthma who could generate correct PIFRs at different inhaler resistance settings.
During a UK asthma review service, patients' PIFR was checked at resistance settings matching their current preventer inhaler device, at R5 (high-resistance dry powder inhaler [DPI]) and at R0 (low resistance, pressurized metered dose inhaler [pMDI]). Correct PIFR ("pass") was defined for R5 as 30 to 90 L/min and for R0 as 20 to 60 L/min. A logistic regression model examined the independent predictors of incorrect PIFR ("fail") at R5 and R0. Asthma severity was assessed retrospectively from treatment level.
A total of 994 adults (females 64.3%) were included, of whom 90.4% currently used a preventer inhaler (71.5% pMDI). PIFR pass rates were 93.7% at R5 compared with 70.5% at R0 (P < .0001). All patients failing the R0 PIFR breathed in too fast (>60 L/min), and 20% of patients currently using pMDI failed for this reason. Independent risk factors for failing R5 were female sex, older age group, and current preventer pMDI and for failing R0 included male sex, younger age group, current preventer DPI, and mild versus severe asthma.
This study demonstrates that most patients with asthma can achieve adequate inspiratory flow to activate high-resistance DPIs, whereas approximately a third of patients breathe in too fast to achieve recommended inspiratory flows for correct pMDI use, including one-fifth of patients who currently use a pMDI preventer.
患者的吸气峰流速(PIFR)可帮助临床医生选择吸入器设备。
确定在不同的吸入器阻力设置下,具有哮喘的患者中能够产生正确 PIFR 的比例。
在英国哮喘审查服务期间,根据患者当前的预防吸入器设备,在阻力设置为 R5(高阻力干粉吸入器[DPI])和 R0(低阻力,压力定量吸入器[pMDI])处检查患者的 PIFR。将 R5 的正确 PIFR(“通过”)定义为 30 至 90 L/min,将 R0 的正确 PIFR 定义为 20 至 60 L/min。使用逻辑回归模型检查 R5 和 R0 时错误 PIFR(“失败”)的独立预测因子。回顾性评估从治疗水平评估哮喘严重程度。
共纳入 994 名成年人(女性占 64.3%),其中 90.4%目前正在使用预防吸入器(71.5% pMDI)。与 R0 相比,R5 的 PIFR 通过率为 93.7%,而 R0 的 PIFR 通过率为 70.5%(P<0.0001)。所有未能通过 R0 PIFR 的患者呼吸过快(>60 L/min),并且有 20%的目前正在使用 pMDI 的患者因此而失败。未能通过 R5 的独立危险因素为女性、年龄较大,当前使用预防吸入器 pMDI;未能通过 R0 的独立危险因素为男性、年龄较小、当前使用预防吸入器 DPI,以及轻度与重度哮喘。
这项研究表明,大多数哮喘患者都能达到足够的吸气流量来激活高阻力 DPI,而大约三分之一的患者呼吸过快,无法达到正确使用 pMDI 的推荐吸气流量,其中包括五分之一目前正在使用 pMDI 预防剂的患者。