• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

吸入器使用趋势及相关碳足迹:一项基于欧洲销售数据的研究

Trends in inhaler use and associated carbon footprint: a sales data-based study in Europe.

作者信息

Vartiainen Ville, Janson Christer, Hisinger-Mölkänen Hanna, Lehtimäki Lauri, Wilkinson Alexander

机构信息

Individualized Drug Therapy Research Program, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.

Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Heart and Lung Center, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.

出版信息

BMJ Open Respir Res. 2025 Sep 1;12(1):e002424. doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2024-002424.

DOI:10.1136/bmjresp-2024-002424
PMID:40889995
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12406821/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Physicians are being encouraged to favour dry powder inhalers (DPI) over pressurised metered dose inhalers (pMDI) on environmental grounds. The EU is reviewing the F-gas regulation to accelerate emission phase-down targets. Thoughtful use of inhalers can reduce emissions while promoting positive clinical outcomes. We aim to describe the trends of pMDI and DPI use and associated carbon footprint in Europe.

METHODS

DPI and pMDI sales data between 2011 and 2021 were extracted from IQVIA MIDAS Quarterly 2022 as total sold doses in 10 European countries. Carbon footprint calculations were based on the Medical and Chemicals Technical Options Committee 2022 assessment report.

RESULTS

Between 2011 and 2021, the carbon footprint of pMDI-based inhalation therapy increased from 3368 to 3891 kilotons (kt) CO equivalents (COe) because of a 16% increase in the number of sold doses of pMDI. Replacing pMDIs with low-carbon inhalers such as DPIs over this period would have produced 92% lower CO emissions. The UK was the largest source of pMDI-related emissions in 2021 with 1235 kt COe (31% of all emissions) in Europe. Short-acting beta-2 agonist (SABA) dose sales were associated with 1642 kt COe emissions in 2021, 94% from pMDIs.

CONCLUSIONS

The carbon footprint of inhaler therapy in Europe grew due to an increased use of pMDIs in many European countries. Greater focus on guideline-based controller therapy will potentially improve patient outcomes and decrease SABA over-reliance. Prioritising DPIs or soft mist inhalers when clinically appropriate can lower inhaler greenhouse gas emissions.

摘要

背景

出于环保考虑,鼓励医生选择干粉吸入器(DPI)而非压力定量吸入器(pMDI)。欧盟正在审查氟气体法规,以加快减排目标。合理使用吸入器可减少排放,同时促进良好的临床效果。我们旨在描述欧洲pMDI和DPI的使用趋势以及相关的碳足迹。

方法

2011年至2021年期间的DPI和pMDI销售数据从艾昆纬MIDAS 2022年季度报告中提取,作为10个欧洲国家的总销售剂量。碳足迹计算基于医学和化学品技术选择委员会2022年评估报告。

结果

2011年至2021年期间,基于pMDI的吸入疗法的碳足迹从3368千吨增加到3891千吨二氧化碳当量(COe),这是因为pMDI的销售剂量增加了16%。在此期间,用低碳吸入器(如DPI)替代pMDI可使二氧化碳排放量降低92%。英国是2021年pMDI相关排放的最大来源,在欧洲排放了1235千吨COe(占所有排放的31%)。2021年,短效β2激动剂(SABA)剂量销售产生了1642千吨COe排放,其中94%来自pMDI。

结论

由于许多欧洲国家pMDI使用量增加,欧洲吸入疗法的碳足迹有所增长。更多地关注基于指南的控制疗法可能会改善患者预后,并减少对SABA的过度依赖。在临床适当时优先选择DPI或软雾吸入器可降低吸入器的温室气体排放。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f9c/12406821/3e538a3ba24b/bmjresp-12-1-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f9c/12406821/aa412a58c5e1/bmjresp-12-1-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f9c/12406821/3e538a3ba24b/bmjresp-12-1-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f9c/12406821/aa412a58c5e1/bmjresp-12-1-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f9c/12406821/3e538a3ba24b/bmjresp-12-1-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Trends in inhaler use and associated carbon footprint: a sales data-based study in Europe.吸入器使用趋势及相关碳足迹:一项基于欧洲销售数据的研究
BMJ Open Respir Res. 2025 Sep 1;12(1):e002424. doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2024-002424.
2
Comparison of the effectiveness of inhaler devices in asthma and chronic obstructive airways disease: a systematic review of the literature.吸入装置在哮喘和慢性阻塞性气道疾病中的有效性比较:文献系统评价
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(26):1-149. doi: 10.3310/hta5260.
3
Systematic review and economic analysis of the comparative effectiveness of different inhaled corticosteroids and their usage with long-acting beta2 agonists for the treatment of chronic asthma in adults and children aged 12 years and over.不同吸入性糖皮质激素及其与长效β2受体激动剂联合使用治疗12岁及以上成人和儿童慢性哮喘比较效果的系统评价与经济学分析
Health Technol Assess. 2008 May;12(19):iii-iv, 1-360. doi: 10.3310/hta12190.
4
Efficacy of Inhaler Devices in New-Onset Mild Asthma: A Randomized Blinded Multicenter Trial.吸入装置在新发轻度哮喘中的疗效:一项随机双盲多中心试验
Adv Ther. 2025 Jun 11. doi: 10.1007/s12325-025-03263-y.
5
Maintenance Inhalers for Asthma and COPD in Spain.西班牙的哮喘和 COPD 维持吸入器。
Respir Care. 2024 Nov 18;69(12):1534-1542. doi: 10.4187/respcare.11643.
6
Impact of Asthma Inhalers on Global Climate: A Systematic Review of Their Carbon Footprint and Clinical Outcomes in Spain.哮喘吸入器对全球气候的影响:西班牙哮喘吸入器碳足迹及其临床结果的系统评价。
J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 2023 Jul 27;33(4):250-262. doi: 10.18176/jiaci.0887. Epub 2023 Jan 4.
7
Comparing the CO emissions of metered dose inhalers and dry powder inhalers: a cross-sectional environmental impact analysis of asthma and COPD therapies in South Tyrol, Italy.定量吸入器与干粉吸入器的一氧化碳排放比较:意大利南蒂罗尔哮喘和慢性阻塞性肺疾病治疗的横断面环境影响分析
BMJ Open Respir Res. 2025 Jun 27;12(1):e002977. doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2024-002977.
8
Clearing the air: Assessing inhaler usage and associated greenhouse gas emissions in a health system.净化空气:评估卫生系统中的吸入器使用情况及相关温室气体排放
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2025 Jun 26;82(13):e607-e614. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/zxae384.
9
Demographic and Asthma-Related Characteristics of Asthmatics Using Pressurized Metered Dose Inhalers and Dry Powder Inhalers.使用压力定量吸入器和干粉吸入器的哮喘患者的人口统计学特征及与哮喘相关的特征
J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv. 2024 Dec;37(6):346-350. doi: 10.1089/jamp.2024.0006. Epub 2024 Jul 30.
10
Thoughtful prescription of inhaled medication has the potential to reduce inhaler-related greenhouse gas emissions by 85.深思熟虑地开具吸入性药物处方,有可能将与吸入器相关的温室气体排放量减少 85%。
BMJ Open Respir Res. 2024 Sep 1;11(1):e001782. doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2023-001782.

本文引用的文献

1
An Investigation into the Factors Associated with Incorrect Use of a Pressurized Metered-Dose Inhaler in Japanese Patients.一项针对日本患者使用压力定量气雾剂不当相关因素的调查。
J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv. 2023 Feb;36(1):12-19. doi: 10.1089/jamp.2022.0018. Epub 2022 Dec 27.
2
The carbon footprint of respiratory treatments in Europe and Canada: an observational study from the CARBON programme.欧洲和加拿大呼吸治疗的碳足迹:CARBON 项目的一项观察性研究。
Eur Respir J. 2022 Aug 10;60(2). doi: 10.1183/13993003.02760-2021. Print 2022 Aug.
3
Turning green: the impact of changing to more eco-friendly respiratory healthcare - a carbon and cost analysis of Dutch prescription data.
转绿:向更环保的呼吸医疗保健转变的影响——荷兰处方数据的碳和成本分析。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jun 14;12(6):e055546. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055546.
4
Effects of switching from a metered dose inhaler to a dry powder inhaler on climate emissions and asthma control: post-hoc analysis.从计量吸入器切换至干粉吸入器对气候排放物和哮喘控制的影响:事后分析。
Thorax. 2022 Dec;77(12):1187-1192. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2021-218088. Epub 2022 Feb 7.
5
The environmental impact of inhalers for asthma: A green challenge and a golden opportunity.哮喘吸入器的环境影响:绿色挑战与黄金机遇。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2022 Jul;88(7):3016-3022. doi: 10.1111/bcp.15135. Epub 2021 Dec 13.
6
Manifesto on the overuse of SABA in the management of asthma: new approaches and new strategies.哮喘管理中 SABA 过度使用的宣言:新方法和新策略。
Ther Adv Respir Dis. 2021 Jan-Dec;15:17534666211042534. doi: 10.1177/17534666211042534.
7
Peak Inspiratory Flow Measured at Different Inhaler Resistances in Patients with Asthma.哮喘患者在不同吸入器阻力下的吸气峰流速测量。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2021 Feb;9(2):890-896. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2020.09.026. Epub 2020 Oct 1.
8
The Climate is Changing for Metered-Dose Inhalers and Action is Needed.定量吸入器的气候正在改变,需要采取行动。
Drug Des Devel Ther. 2020 Jul 29;14:3043-3055. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S262141. eCollection 2020.
9
SABINA: An Overview of Short-Acting β-Agonist Use in Asthma in European Countries.SABINA:欧洲国家中短效 β 激动剂在哮喘中的应用概述。
Adv Ther. 2020 Mar;37(3):1124-1135. doi: 10.1007/s12325-020-01233-0. Epub 2020 Jan 24.
10
Carbon footprint impact of the choice of inhalers for asthma and COPD.哮喘和 COPD 患者吸入器选择的碳足迹影响。
Thorax. 2020 Jan;75(1):82-84. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2019-213744. Epub 2019 Nov 7.