Suppr超能文献

小学哮喘患儿使用干粉吸入器:一项系统评价

Dry-powder inhaler use in primary school-aged children with asthma: a systematic review.

作者信息

Kuek Stephanie L, Wong Nicole X, Dalziel Stuart, Hatter Lee, Fleming Louise, Bush Andrew, Beasley Richard, Shanthikumar Shivanthan

机构信息

Respiratory and Sleep Medicine, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.

Respiratory Medicine, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK.

出版信息

ERJ Open Res. 2024 Dec 9;10(6). doi: 10.1183/23120541.00455-2024. eCollection 2024 Nov.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Asthma is the most common chronic disease among children. Dry-powder inhalers (DPIs) are effective for medication delivery in adults and adolescents, and provide a lower environmental footprint and more portability than a metered dose inhaler (MDI) with a spacer. They require a specific technique, and it is necessary to ascertain whether they can be used in younger age groups. We aimed to assess evidence regarding whether primary school-aged (5-11 years) children can use DPIs with adequate technique during both stable and acute asthma.

DESIGN

Ovid MEDLINE, Embase and PubMed were searched for studies assessing DPI use among children aged 5-11 years with asthma or wheeze. Results of studies were synthesised by study design and outcome measure.

RESULTS

38 studies were identified for analysis. These were analysed in three groups: 1) 25 studies assessing children's ability to use DPIs by peak inspiratory flow measurement, 2) 10 studies assessing children's ability to use DPIs by physician assessment, and 3) three studies measuring the efficacy of DPIs compared with the gold standard (MDI with spacer). Five studies included children during acute exacerbations.

CONCLUSION

The majority of primary school-aged children have the ability to use a DPI with adequate training, support and practice. Some younger children may have difficulties, and clinician assessment and ongoing review is crucial in determining which children are likely to benefit from a DPI. Consistent correct use and adherence remain as challenges, but these are also issues with an MDI plus spacer and do not appear to be significantly worse with DPIs. Evidence of the use of DPIs during acute illness is limited; more studies are required in this setting.

摘要

目的

哮喘是儿童中最常见的慢性疾病。干粉吸入器(DPI)在成人和青少年中用于药物递送是有效的,并且与带有储雾罐的定量吸入器(MDI)相比,对环境的影响更小且更便于携带。它们需要特定的技术,因此有必要确定其是否可用于更年幼的年龄组。我们旨在评估关于小学年龄段(5 - 11岁)儿童在哮喘稳定期和急性发作期能否以适当技术使用DPI的证据。

设计

检索了Ovid MEDLINE、Embase和PubMed,以查找评估5 - 11岁哮喘或喘息儿童使用DPI情况的研究。研究结果按研究设计和结局指标进行综合分析。

结果

共确定38项研究用于分析。这些研究分为三组进行分析:1)25项通过峰值吸气流速测量评估儿童使用DPI能力的研究;2)10项通过医生评估来评估儿童使用DPI能力的研究;3)3项将DPI与金标准(带储雾罐的MDI)比较测量其疗效的研究。五项研究纳入了急性加重期的儿童。

结论

大多数小学年龄段儿童经过充分的培训、支持和练习有能力使用DPI。一些年幼的儿童可能会有困难,临床医生的评估和持续复查对于确定哪些儿童可能从DPI中获益至关重要。持续正确使用和依从性仍然是挑战,但这些也是MDI加储雾罐存在的问题,且在DPI方面似乎并没有明显更糟。关于急性疾病期间使用DPI的证据有限;在这种情况下需要更多研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/989d/11626612/90bc87367e08/00455-2024.01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验