Medical Oncology Unit, ASST Settelaghi, Varese, Italy.
Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Insubria, Varese, Como, Italy.
Intern Emerg Med. 2021 Mar;16(2):477-486. doi: 10.1007/s11739-020-02508-8. Epub 2020 Oct 3.
Anthracyclines are extensively used in oncologic patients, in particular for breast cancer and hematological malignancies. Cardiac injury is a potentially dangerous side effect of these drugs. In this systematic review, we analyzed published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to assess if potential cardioprotective drugs (i.e., renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system [RAAS] blockers and β-blockers) may prevent heart damage by anthracyclines. Studies were identified by electronic search of MEDLINE and EMBASE database until August 2020. The impact of cardioprotective drugs to prevent anthracyclines-induced cardiac injury was expressed as mean difference (MD) or odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Statistical heterogeneity was assessed with the I statistic. Twelve RCTs for a total of 1.035 cancer patients treated with anthracyclines were included. RAAS blockers, β-blockers, and aldosterone antagonists showed a statistically significant benefit in preventing left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) reduction (MD 3.57, 95% CI 1.04, 6.09) in 11 studies. A non-statistically significant difference was observed in preventing E/A velocity decrease (MD 0.09, 95% CI 0.00, 0.17; 9 studies), left ventricular end-systolic diameter (LVESD) increase (MD - 0.88, 95% CI, - 2.75,0.99; 6 studies), left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD) increase (MD -0.95, 95% CI - 2.67,0.76; 6 studies), and mitral A velocity decrease (MD - 1.42, 95% CI - 3.01,0.17; 4 studies). Heart failure was non-significantly reduced in the cardioprotective arm (OR 0.31, 95% CI 0.06, 1.59; 5 studies). Hypotension was non-significantly increased in the cardioprotective arm (OR 3.91, 95% CI 0.42, 36.46, 3 studies). Cardioprotective drugs reduce anthracycline-induced cardiac damage as assessed by echocardiographic parameters. The clinical relevance of this positive effect is still to be defined.
蒽环类药物广泛用于肿瘤患者,特别是乳腺癌和血液系统恶性肿瘤患者。心脏损伤是这些药物的一种潜在危险的副作用。在这项系统评价中,我们分析了已发表的随机对照试验(RCT),以评估潜在的心脏保护药物(即肾素-血管紧张素-醛固酮系统[RAAS]阻滞剂和β受体阻滞剂)是否可以预防蒽环类药物引起的心脏损伤。通过电子搜索 MEDLINE 和 EMBASE 数据库,直到 2020 年 8 月确定了研究。心脏保护药物预防蒽环类药物引起的心脏损伤的影响表示为均数差(MD)或比值比(OR)和 95%置信区间(95%CI)。使用 I 统计量评估统计异质性。共纳入 12 项 RCT,总计 1035 例接受蒽环类药物治疗的癌症患者。RAAS 阻滞剂、β受体阻滞剂和醛固酮拮抗剂在预防 11 项研究中左心室射血分数(LVEF)降低(MD 3.57,95%CI 1.04,6.09)方面显示出统计学意义上的获益。在预防 E/A 速度降低(MD 0.09,95%CI 0.00,0.17;9 项研究)、左心室收缩末期直径(LVESD)增加(MD -0.88,95%CI,-2.75,0.99;6 项研究)、左心室舒张末期直径(LVEDD)增加(MD -0.95,95%CI -2.67,0.76;6 项研究)和二尖瓣 A 速度降低(MD -1.42,95%CI -3.01,0.17;4 项研究)方面,差异无统计学意义。在心脏保护组,心力衰竭的发生率非显著降低(OR 0.31,95%CI 0.06,1.59;5 项研究)。在心脏保护组,低血压的发生率非显著增加(OR 3.91,95%CI 0.42,36.46,3 项研究)。心脏保护药物可减少超声心动图参数评估的蒽环类药物引起的心脏损伤。这种积极影响的临床意义仍有待确定。