Suppr超能文献

癌症治疗引起的心力衰竭:我们能预防它吗?

Heart failure from cancer therapy: can we prevent it?

机构信息

Department of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, West German Heart and Vascular Center, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45147, Essen, Germany.

Institute for Pathophysiology, West German Heart and Vascular Center, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.

出版信息

ESC Heart Fail. 2019 Aug;6(4):856-862. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.12493. Epub 2019 Jul 11.

Abstract

AIMS

Conventional cytotoxic chemotherapy is still among the most effective treatment options for many types of cancer. However, cardiotoxicity, notably the decrease in left ventricular function under these regimens, can impair prognosis. Thus, prevention and treatment of cardiotoxicity are crucial. The present meta-analysis aims to assess the efficacy of beta-blockers or angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors/angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) for prevention of cardiotoxicity.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We systematically searched Pubmed, Cochrane, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases for randomized controlled trials published until February 2019. The analysis included randomized studies that reported on left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) after 6 months of chemotherapy in cancer patients who received beta-blockers or ACE inhibitors/ARBs for prevention of cardiotoxicity compared with controls. Studies on combination cardioprotective therapies were excluded from the analysis. The primary endpoint was prevention of a decrease in LVEF as defined by the individual study and as assessed by either transthoracic echocardiography or magnetic resonance imaging. We here show that patients under anthracycline-based chemotherapy have a moderate yet significant benefit in LVEF from beta-blockers or ACEs/ARBs. The beta-blocker analysis included 769 cancer patients, and the ACE inhibitors/ARBs analysis included a total of 581 cancer patients. The mean LVEF difference between the beta-blocker group and the control group was 2.57% (95% confidence interval 0.63-4.51, P = 0.009). The mean difference for ACE inhibitors/ARBs was 4.71% (95% confidence interval 0.38-9.03, P = 0.03). However, the beneficial effects throughout the studies were variable as documented by significant heterogeneity between the studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Systematic evidence is needed to solidly found recommendations for cardioprotective prevention during chemotherapy. Likewise, trials on other neurohumoral drugs (spironolactone) and lipid-lowering approaches are required to improve protection for cardio-oncology patients.

摘要

目的

传统细胞毒性化疗仍然是许多类型癌症最有效的治疗选择之一。然而,这些方案下的心脏毒性,特别是左心室功能下降,会损害预后。因此,预防和治疗心脏毒性至关重要。本荟萃分析旨在评估β受体阻滞剂或血管紧张素转换酶(ACE)抑制剂/血管紧张素 II 受体阻滞剂(ARB)预防心脏毒性的疗效。

方法和结果

我们系统地检索了 Pubmed、Cochrane、EMBASE 和 Web of Science 数据库,以获取截至 2019 年 2 月发表的随机对照试验。该分析纳入了在接受化疗的癌症患者中,与对照组相比,接受β受体阻滞剂或 ACE 抑制剂/ARB 预防心脏毒性的患者在化疗 6 个月后左心室射血分数(LVEF)的随机研究。排除了联合心脏保护治疗的研究。主要终点是根据个体研究定义的 LVEF 下降的预防,以及通过经胸超声心动图或磁共振成像评估的 LVEF 下降的预防。我们在此表明,接受蒽环类药物化疗的患者在 LVEF 方面从β受体阻滞剂或 ACE 抑制剂/ARB 中获益中等但有显著意义。β受体阻滞剂分析纳入了 769 例癌症患者,ACE 抑制剂/ARB 分析共纳入了 581 例癌症患者。β受体阻滞剂组与对照组之间的平均 LVEF 差异为 2.57%(95%置信区间 0.63-4.51,P=0.009)。ACE 抑制剂/ARB 的平均差异为 4.71%(95%置信区间 0.38-9.03,P=0.03)。然而,正如研究之间存在显著异质性所记录的那样,整个研究中的有益效果是可变的。

结论

需要系统的证据来为化疗期间的心脏保护预防提供有力的建议。同样,需要进行其他神经激素药物(螺内酯)和降脂方法的试验,以提高心脏肿瘤患者的保护。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/87ba/6676296/4942c073b20c/EHF2-6-856-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验