Shiau Y F
Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci. 1987;25(1):43-69. doi: 10.3109/10408368709105877.
Diarrheal disorders are the result of excessive fluid and electrolyte loss through the gastrointestinal tract. Many different underlying mechanisms are known to cause diarrhea. Fordtran suggested that in secretory diarrhea the osmolality of stool water should be accounted for by its electrolyte contents. Therefore, the osmotic gap between the measured osmolality and that estimated from electrolyte contents should be small. In osmotic diarrhea, due to the presence of the osmotic agent, there should be a greater gap between the measured and the estimated osmolalities. Osmotic gaps varying from 100 to 40 mOsm have been used arbitrarily in literatures to define the underlying pathogenesis. Because of the uncertainty, the usefulness of these measurements remains in question. In this article, methods used to measure stool osmolality and electrolyte contents are reviewed. Limitations of these measurements are discussed. Measurements derived from various diarrheal disorders revealed that the basic concepts put forward by Fordtran are corrected. However, we found that the osmotic gaps (measured osmolality - 2 [Na + K] in secretory diarrheal disorders are frequently negative numbers. In osmotic diarrhea, the osmotic gap (greater than 160 mOsm) is substantially greater than the figures used in the literature. In many diarrheal disorders the osmotic gap falls between the two extremes and the pathogenesis is multifactorial in origin. Under these circumstances, stool osmolality and electrolyte measurements provide little insight into the underlying mechanism causing the diarrhea. Furthermore, stool contains many biologically active organisms which can alter the stool osmolality. Unless these effects are appreciated, an inaccurate interpretation of these measurements may result.
腹泻性疾病是胃肠道过度丢失液体和电解质的结果。已知许多不同的潜在机制可导致腹泻。福特兰指出,在分泌性腹泻中,粪便水的渗透压应由其电解质含量来解释。因此,测量的渗透压与根据电解质含量估算的渗透压之间的渗透间隙应较小。在渗透性腹泻中,由于存在渗透剂,测量的渗透压与估算的渗透压之间应有更大的间隙。文献中任意使用100至40毫渗量/升的渗透间隙来定义潜在的发病机制。由于存在不确定性,这些测量方法的实用性仍存在疑问。在本文中,对用于测量粪便渗透压和电解质含量的方法进行了综述。讨论了这些测量方法的局限性。对各种腹泻性疾病的测量结果表明,福特兰提出的基本概念是正确的。然而,我们发现,分泌性腹泻疾病中的渗透间隙(测量的渗透压 - 2[钠 + 钾])经常是负数。在渗透性腹泻中,渗透间隙(大于160毫渗量/升)大大高于文献中使用的数值。在许多腹泻性疾病中,渗透间隙介于这两个极端之间,发病机制是多因素的。在这种情况下,粪便渗透压和电解质测量对引起腹泻的潜在机制提供的见解很少。此外,粪便中含有许多可改变粪便渗透压的生物活性物质。除非认识到这些影响,否则可能会对这些测量结果产生不准确的解释。