• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

直升机真的比救护车快吗?帕多瓦直升机紧急医疗服务站的经验。

Is Helicopter Really Faster Than Ambulance? The Padua Helicopter Emergency Medical Services Station Experience.

机构信息

UOC Centrale Operativa Servizio di Urgenza ed Emergenza Medica 118, Azienda Ospedaliera di Padova, Padua, Italy.

Università degli Studi di Padova, Padua, Italy.

出版信息

Air Med J. 2020 Sep-Oct;39(5):399-403. doi: 10.1016/j.amj.2020.05.012. Epub 2020 Jun 23.

DOI:10.1016/j.amj.2020.05.012
PMID:33012480
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Helicopter transport plays a fundamental role in modern health systems, and, yet, it is not been the focus of scientific research, especially in Italy. Our objective was to analyze Padua helicopter emergency medical services (HEMS) station operations to discover whether this resource has been used correctly and advantageously.

METHODS

The study was conducted considering 115 helicopter air ambulance operations minutes in 2018. Additionally, using geographic information systems and estimated ambulance data, a comparison was drawn between air and ground emergency medical services.

RESULTS

Interfacility transports involved mainly adults. There were 65 (56.52%) "acute transports," 49 (42.61%) "back transports," and 1 "hyperspecialized care transport" (0.87%). The average route distance was 44.23 km; the modal class was 25 to 30 km. The average mission time was 1 hour 26 minutes; the modal class was 1 hour to 1 hour 15 minutes. The Pearson correlation coefficient between flying/traveling time and the route length was 0.92 for helicopter and 0.94 for ambulance, and between mission time and route length, it was 0.05 for helicopter and 0.94 for ambulance.

CONCLUSION

Helicopters are not always the fastest mode of transporting patients, and journey time is variable. Because of the importance of rapid response in emergency situations, we propose not to use helicopters for transports less than 50 km in distance.

摘要

目的

直升机运输在现代卫生系统中起着至关重要的作用,但它尚未成为科学研究的焦点,尤其是在意大利。我们的目的是分析帕多瓦直升机紧急医疗服务(HEMS)站的运作情况,以发现该资源是否得到了正确和有利的利用。

方法

本研究考虑了 2018 年 115 次直升机空中救护行动的分钟数。此外,利用地理信息系统和估算的救护车数据,对空中和地面紧急医疗服务进行了比较。

结果

院际转运主要涉及成年人。有 65 例(56.52%)为“急性转运”,49 例(42.61%)为“回程转运”,1 例为“超专科护理转运”(0.87%)。平均路线距离为 44.23 公里;模态类别为 25 至 30 公里。平均任务时间为 1 小时 26 分钟;模态类别为 1 小时至 1 小时 15 分钟。直升机飞行/行驶时间与路线长度之间的皮尔逊相关系数为 0.92,救护车为 0.94;任务时间与路线长度之间的皮尔逊相关系数为直升机 0.05,救护车为 0.94。

结论

直升机并不总是运送患者最快的方式,而且飞行时间是可变的。由于在紧急情况下快速反应的重要性,我们建议不要使用直升机运送距离小于 50 公里的患者。

相似文献

1
Is Helicopter Really Faster Than Ambulance? The Padua Helicopter Emergency Medical Services Station Experience.直升机真的比救护车快吗?帕多瓦直升机紧急医疗服务站的经验。
Air Med J. 2020 Sep-Oct;39(5):399-403. doi: 10.1016/j.amj.2020.05.012. Epub 2020 Jun 23.
2
Is air transport faster? A comparison of air versus ground transport times for interfacility transfers in a regional referral system.航空运输更快吗?区域转诊系统中机构间转运的航空与地面运输时间比较。
Air Med J. 2006 Jul-Aug;25(4):170-2. doi: 10.1016/j.amj.2006.04.003.
3
A Retrospective Geospatial Simulation Study of Helicopter Emergency Medical Services' Potential Time Benefit Over Ground Ambulance Transport in Northern South Africa.南非北部直升机紧急医疗服务相对于地面救护车运输潜在时间效益的回顾性地理空间模拟研究。
Air Med J. 2023 Nov-Dec;42(6):440-444. doi: 10.1016/j.amj.2023.07.005. Epub 2023 Aug 6.
4
When is the helicopter faster? A comparison of helicopter and ground ambulance transport times.直升机何时速度更快?直升机与地面救护车转运时间的比较。
J Trauma. 2005 Jan;58(1):148-53. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000124264.43941.41.
5
Helicopter versus ground ambulance transport for interfacility transfer of critically ill children.直升机与地面救护车在危重症儿童机构间转运中的比较。
Am J Emerg Med. 2022 Nov;61:44-51. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2022.08.032. Epub 2022 Aug 20.
6
Optimizing remote and rural prehospital resources using air transport of thrombectomy candidates.优化远程和农村地区的院前资源,使用空中运输取栓候选者。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2024 Apr 16;32(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s13049-024-01203-3.
7
A hybrid strategy using an ambulance and a helicopter to convey thrombectomy candidates to definite care: a prospective observational study.一种使用救护车和直升机将适合进行血栓切除术的患者转运至确定性治疗机构的混合策略:一项前瞻性观察性研究。
BMC Emerg Med. 2024 Jan 25;24(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s12873-024-00931-0.
8
Comparison of helicopter versus ground transport for the interfacility transport of isolated spinal injury.直升机与地面交通工具用于院间转运孤立性脊柱损伤患者的比较
Spine J. 2014 Jul 1;14(7):1147-54. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.07.478. Epub 2013 Oct 16.
9
Helicopter Transport Has Decreased Over Time and Transport From Scene or Hospital Matters.直升机转运的次数随着时间的推移而减少,而且转运主要发生在现场或医院。
Air Med J. 2020 Jul-Aug;39(4):283-290. doi: 10.1016/j.amj.2020.04.006. Epub 2020 Apr 20.
10
Critical Care Transport Time Differences Between Ground, Helicopter VFR, and Helicopter IFR Transports.地面、直升机目视飞行规则(VFR)和直升机仪表飞行规则(IFR)转运之间的重症监护运输时间差异
Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2020 Feb 1;91(2):98-101. doi: 10.3357/AMHP.5468.2020.

引用本文的文献

1
Is helicopter transferal in the "drip-and-ship" approach for endovascular treatment the better choice? A retrospective analysis of transfer times.在血管内治疗的“点滴转运”方法中,直升机转运是更好的选择吗?转运时间的回顾性分析。
Front Neurol. 2025 Jul 1;16:1582098. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1582098. eCollection 2025.