Suppr超能文献

气道阻断压在 100 毫秒时(P0.1)对机械通气撤机成功的预测价值:系统评价和荟萃分析。

The predictive value of airway occlusion pressure at 100 msec (P0.1) on successful weaning from mechanical ventilation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, John A. Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, HI, USA.

Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care medicine, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Japan.

出版信息

J Crit Care. 2021 Jun;63:124-132. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2020.09.030. Epub 2020 Sep 30.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The predictive value of airway occlusion pressure at 100 milliseconds (P0.1) on weaning outcome has been controversial. We performed a meta-analysis to investigate the predictive value of P0.1 on successful weaning from mechanical ventilation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and EMBASE, and two authors independently screened articles. The pooled sensitivity, specificity and the summary receiver operating characteristic (sROC) curve were estimated. Diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) was calculated using meta-regression analysis.

RESULTS

We included 12 prospective observational studies (n = 1089 patients). Analyses of sROC curves showed the area under the curve of 0.81 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.77 to 0.84) for P0.1. The pooled sensitivity and specificity were 86% (95% CI, 72 to 94%) and 58% (95% CI, 37% to 76%) with substantial heterogeneity respectively. DOR was 20.09 (p = 0.019, 95%CI: 1.63-247.15). After filling the missing data using the trim-and-fill method to adjust publication bias, DOR was 36.23 (p = 0.002, 95%CI: 3.56-372.41).

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis suggests that P0.1 is a useful tool to predict successful weaning. To determine clinical utility, a large prospective study investigating the sensitivity and specificity of P0.1 on weaning outcomes from mechanical ventilation is warranted.

摘要

目的

气道阻断压在 100 毫秒(P0.1)时对撤机结局的预测价值一直存在争议。我们进行了一项荟萃分析,以调查 P0.1 对机械通气撤机成功的预测价值。

材料和方法

我们检索了 MEDLINE、Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库和 EMBASE,并由两名作者独立筛选文章。估计了汇总敏感性、特异性和汇总受试者工作特征(sROC)曲线。使用 meta 回归分析计算诊断比值比(DOR)。

结果

我们纳入了 12 项前瞻性观察性研究(n=1089 名患者)。sROC 曲线分析显示 P0.1 的曲线下面积为 0.81(95%置信区间[CI]:0.77 至 0.84)。汇总敏感性和特异性分别为 86%(95%CI:72%至 94%)和 58%(95%CI:37%至 76%),存在较大异质性。DOR 为 20.09(p=0.019,95%CI:1.63-247.15)。使用删失和填补法填补缺失数据以调整发表偏倚后,DOR 为 36.23(p=0.002,95%CI:3.56-372.41)。

结论

这项荟萃分析表明,P0.1 是预测撤机成功的有用工具。为了确定其临床实用性,需要进行一项大型前瞻性研究,以调查 P0.1 对机械通气撤机结局的敏感性和特异性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验