大学生报告假设性强奸可能性的预测因素：对强奸谬见的认同、感知到的报告障碍及自我效能感。
Predictors of College Students' Likelihood to Report Hypothetical Rape: Rape Myth Acceptance, Perceived Barriers to Reporting, and Self-Efficacy.
作者信息
Hahn Christine K, Hahn Austin, Gaster Sam, Quevillon Randy
机构信息
Department of Psychology, University of South Dakota, National Crime Victims Research & Treatment Center (NCVRTC), Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, 67 President St., 2nd Fl. S., MSC 861, Charleston SC 29425-8610.
Department of Psychology, University of South Dakota, South Dakota Union , 414 E. Clark St. , Vermillion, SD 57069 USA.
出版信息
Ethics Behav. 2020;30(1):45-62. doi: 10.1080/10508422.2018.1552519. Epub 2018 Dec 20.
Abstract
Rape myth acceptance (RMA), perceived barriers, and self-efficacy were examined as predictors of likelihood to report different types of rape to law enforcement among 409 undergraduates. Participants had lower likelihood to report incapacitated compared to physically forced rape. Men had lower reporting likelihood than women for rape perpetrated by the same and opposite sex, and were more likely to perceive several barriers. RMA and perceived barriers predicted a lower likelihood to report several types of rape. Among men, higher self-efficacy predicted increased reporting likelihood. Targeting RMA and decreasing perceived barriers is imperative to increase college students' likelihood to report rape to local and campus law enforcement.
摘要
在409名本科生中，研究了对强奸谬见的认同（RMA）、感知到的障碍和自我效能感，将其作为向执法部门报告不同类型强奸案可能性的预测因素。与身体强迫强奸相比，参与者报告无行为能力强奸的可能性较低。对于同性和异性实施的强奸，男性报告的可能性低于女性，并且更有可能感知到多种障碍。RMA和感知到的障碍预示着报告几种类型强奸的可能性较低。在男性中，较高的自我效能感预示着报告可能性的增加。针对RMA并减少感知到的障碍对于提高大学生向地方和校园执法部门报告强奸案的可能性至关重要。
相似文献
1
Predictors of College Students' Likelihood to Report Hypothetical Rape: Rape Myth Acceptance, Perceived Barriers to Reporting, and Self-Efficacy.大学生报告假设性强奸可能性的预测因素：对强奸谬见的认同、感知到的报告障碍及自我效能感。
Ethics Behav. 2020;30(1):45-62. doi: 10.1080/10508422.2018.1552519. Epub 2018 Dec 20.
2
Rape Myth Acceptance and Other Barriers to Formally Reporting Sexual Assault Among College Students With and Without Sexual Assault Histories.有无性侵犯史的大学生对强奸谬见的认同及正式报告性侵犯的其他障碍
J Interpers Violence. 2023 May;38(9-10):6773-6797. doi: 10.1177/08862605221137703. Epub 2022 Nov 24.
3
Changes in Rape Myth Acceptance Among Undergraduates: 2010 to 2017.强奸谬论接受度在大学生群体中的变化：2010 年至 2017 年。
J Interpers Violence. 2021 Oct;36(19-20):9371-9392. doi: 10.1177/0886260519867153. Epub 2019 Aug 6.
4
Rape Myth Acceptance Among Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Mostly Heterosexual College Students.性同意观念在男女同校大学生中的接受情况。
J Interpers Violence. 2021 Jan;36(1-2):NP232-NP262. doi: 10.1177/0886260517733282. Epub 2017 Sep 27.
5
Sexual Assault Supportive Attitudes: Rape Myth Acceptance and Token Resistance in Greek and Non-Greek College Students From Two University Samples in the United States.性侵犯支持态度：美国两所大学的希腊裔和非希腊裔大学生中的强奸谬论接受和象征性抵制。
J Interpers Violence. 2018 Nov;33(22):3502-3530. doi: 10.1177/0886260516636064. Epub 2016 Mar 3.
6
Rape Myth Acceptance Buffers the Association Between Sexual Assault and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Symptoms Among College Students.对强奸谬见的认同缓冲了大学生性侵犯与创伤后应激障碍症状之间的关联。
J Interpers Violence. 2022 Nov;37(21-22):NP20386-NP20408. doi: 10.1177/08862605211050101. Epub 2021 Oct 22.
7
Social norms and the likelihood of raping: Perceived rape myth acceptance of others affects men's rape proclivity.社会规范与强奸可能性：对他人强奸谬见的认知接受程度会影响男性的强奸倾向。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2006 Mar;32(3):286-97. doi: 10.1177/0146167205280912.
8
Rape Myth Acceptance and General Self-Efficacy: Gender, Race, and Ethnic Differences of Knowing a Sexual Assault Victim among University Students.对强奸谬见的认同与一般自我效能感：大学生中认识性侵犯受害者的性别、种族和民族差异
Violence Against Women. 2022 Dec;28(15-16):3762-3784. doi: 10.1177/10778012211068056. Epub 2022 Jan 25.
9
Rape myth acceptance impacts the reporting of rape to the police: a study of incarcerated women.强奸谬论接受度影响强奸案向警方报案：一项对被监禁妇女的研究。
Violence Against Women. 2013 Sep;19(9):1065-78. doi: 10.1177/1077801213501841.
10
Priming Self-Affirmation Reduces the Negative Impact of High Rape Myth Acceptance: Assessing Women's Perceptions and Judgments of Sexual Assault.启动自我肯定能降低高强奸谬论接受的负面影响：评估女性对性侵犯的认知和判断。
J Interpers Violence. 2022 Apr;37(7-8):NP3728-NP3749. doi: 10.1177/0886260520951312. Epub 2020 Aug 25.
引用本文的文献
1
Explaining Societal Shifts in Victim Blaming and Perpetrator Culpability for Sexual Violence: Evidence From the #MeToo Era.解释性暴力事件中受害者归咎与犯罪者罪责认定的社会转变：#MeToo时代的证据
Sex Roles. 2025;91(7):50. doi: 10.1007/s11199-025-01590-6. Epub 2025 Jul 7.
2
Enhancing Campus Safety: Exploring Student Perspectives on a Text Message-Delivered Intervention for Addressing Sexual Violence and Alcohol Use.增强校园安全：探索学生对短信干预措施的看法，以解决性暴力和酗酒问题。
J Forensic Nurs. 2024;20(1):30-42. doi: 10.1097/JFN.0000000000000454. Epub 2023 Nov 29.
3
A Strengths and Needs Assessment of Campus Sexual Assault Response.校园性侵犯反应的优势和需求评估。
J Forensic Nurs. 2024;20(1):3-11. doi: 10.1097/JFN.0000000000000452. Epub 2023 Nov 3.
4
Psychosocial Health Factors Among Men Reporting Recent Sexual Assault.男性近期遭受性侵犯后的心理社会健康因素。
J Forensic Nurs. 2023;19(2):88-99. doi: 10.1097/JFN.0000000000000428. Epub 2023 Mar 7.
5
The association between social support and posttraumatic stress symptoms among survivors of betrayal trauma: a meta-analysis.背叛创伤幸存者中社会支持与创伤后应激症状之间的关联：一项荟萃分析。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2021 Mar 30;12(1):1883925. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2021.1883925.
本文引用的文献
1
Masculinity and Bystander Attitudes: Moderating Effects of Masculine Gender Role Stress.男性气质与旁观者态度：男性性别角色压力的调节作用
Psychol Violence. 2016 Jan;6(1):82-90. doi: 10.1037/a0038926.
2
Rape myth acceptance and rape acknowledgment: The mediating role of sexual refusal assertiveness.强奸谬论认同和强奸认知：性拒绝自信的中介作用。
Psychiatry Res. 2018 May;263:15-21. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2018.02.029. Epub 2018 Feb 16.
3
Precollege Sexual Violence Perpetration and Associated Risk and Protective Factors Among Male College Freshmen in Georgia.佐治亚州男大学新生的青春期前性暴力实施及其相关风险和保护因素。
J Adolesc Health. 2018 Mar;62(3S):S51-S57. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2017.09.028.
4
The Role of Hypermasculinity, Token Resistance, Rape Myth, and Assertive Sexual Consent Communication Among College Men.大学生男性中的过度男子气概、象征性反抗、强奸谬论和自信的性同意沟通的作用。
J Adolesc Health. 2018 Mar;62(3S):S44-S50. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2017.10.015.
5
Sexual assault incidents among college undergraduates: Prevalence and factors associated with risk.大学生中的性侵犯事件：发生率及相关风险因素。
PLoS One. 2017 Nov 8;12(11):e0186471. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186471. eCollection 2017.
6
Labeling Sexual Victimization Experiences: The Role of Sexism, Rape Myth Acceptance, and Tolerance for Sexual Harassment.标注性侵犯经历：性别歧视、强奸谬见认同及对性骚扰的容忍度所起的作用
Violence Vict. 2016;31(2):332-46. doi: 10.1891/0886-6708.VV-D-13-00148. Epub 2016 Jan 29.
7
Rape Myth Consistency and Gender Differences in Perceiving Rape Victims: A Meta-Analysis.强奸谬见一致性与对强奸受害者认知中的性别差异：一项元分析
Violence Against Women. 2016 Feb;22(2):139-67. doi: 10.1177/1077801215607359. Epub 2015 Oct 6.
8
Rape Myths, Rape Scripts, and Common Rape Experiences of College Women: Differences in Perceptions of Women Who Have Been Raped.强奸谬见、强奸脚本与大学女生的常见强奸经历：对强奸受害者认知的差异
Violence Against Women. 2016 Mar;22(3):307-23. doi: 10.1177/1077801215599844. Epub 2015 Aug 13.
9
Barriers and Facilitators of Mental Health Treatment-Seeking in U.S. Active Duty Soldiers With Sexual Assault Histories.有性侵犯史的美国现役军人寻求心理健康治疗的障碍与促进因素
J Trauma Stress. 2015 Aug;28(4):289-97. doi: 10.1002/jts.22026. Epub 2015 Jul 27.
10
Predicting Bystander Behavior to Prevent Sexual Assault on College Campuses: The Role of Self-Efficacy and Intent.预测旁观者行为以预防大学校园性侵犯：自我效能感和意图的作用。
Am J Community Psychol. 2015 Sep;56(1-2):46-56. doi: 10.1007/s10464-015-9740-0.
Zotero 插件