Baird Matthew, Schwartz Heather, Hunter Gerald, Gary-Webb Tiffany L, Ghosh-Dastidar Bonnie, Dubowitz Tamara, Troxel Wendy
RAND Corporation, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
RAND Corporation, New Orleans, LA, USA.
Hous Policy Debate. 2020;30(2):164-190. doi: 10.1080/10511482.2019.1655468. Epub 2019 Oct 18.
During the 1990s, the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development awarded more than $6 billion in competitive grants called HOPE VI to spur neighborhood redevelopment. We add to HOPE VI research by examining the impacts of a large set of public-private real estate investments, including HOPE VI, made over a 16-year period in a distressed Pittsburgh neighborhood called the Hill District. Specifically, we estimate the effects of the $468 million additional public-private investments that Hill District received compared to a demographically similar neighborhood on sale prices, rental prices, and crime. We find large and statistically significant impacts of the public-private investments on residential sales prices, commercial sales prices, and on rental prices, but only a marginally significant yet meaningful decline in non-violent arrests. For each additional $10 million of public-private investment, we find a 0.95 percent increase in residential sales prices, 2.7 percent increase in commercial sales prices, and 0.55 percent increase in rental prices. Because there was an accumulated difference over 16 years of $468 million in the amount of public-private investment across the two neighborhoods we examine, these percentage increases amount to large changes in real estate prices over that time. Commercial real estate investors and homeowners benefited the most, followed by residential landlords. Our analyses imply cities should anticipate the potential impacts of major neighborhood investment on low-income households, especially unsubsidized renters that most directly experience the brunt of rising rents.
在20世纪90年代,美国住房和城市发展部发放了超过60亿美元名为“希望六号”的竞争性拨款,以刺激社区重建。我们通过研究在匹兹堡一个名为希尔区的困境社区16年间进行的包括“希望六号”在内的大量公私房地产投资的影响,来补充对“希望六号”的研究。具体而言,我们估计了希尔区与一个人口统计学特征相似的社区相比所获得的4.68亿美元额外公私投资对销售价格、租金价格和犯罪的影响。我们发现公私投资对住宅销售价格、商业销售价格和租金价格有巨大且具有统计学意义的影响,但对非暴力逮捕仅有微弱但有意义的下降。每增加1000万美元的公私投资,我们发现住宅销售价格上涨0.95%,商业销售价格上涨2.7%,租金价格上涨0.55%。由于我们研究的两个社区在16年里公私投资金额累计相差4.68亿美元,这些百分比增长相当于那段时间房地产价格的大幅变化。商业房地产投资者和房主受益最大,其次是住宅房东。我们的分析表明,城市应该预计主要社区投资对低收入家庭的潜在影响,尤其是那些最直接承受租金上涨冲击的无补贴租户。