• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Assessing Second Language Listening Over the Past Twenty Years: A Review Within the Socio-Cognitive Framework.二十年来第二语言听力评估:社会认知框架内的综述
Front Psychol. 2020 Sep 3;11:2123. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02123. eCollection 2020.
2
Listening Effort by Native and Nonnative Listeners Due to Noise, Reverberation, and Talker Foreign Accent During English Speech Perception.母语和非母语听者在英语语音感知中因噪声、混响和说话者外国口音而产生的听力努力。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2019 Apr 15;62(4):1068-1081. doi: 10.1044/2018_JSLHR-H-17-0423.
3
Examining Second Language Listening, Vocabulary, and Executive Functioning.审视第二语言听力、词汇及执行功能。
Front Psychol. 2020 Jun 3;11:1122. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01122. eCollection 2020.
4
An Optimal Choice of Cognitive Diagnostic Model for Second Language Listening Comprehension Test.第二语言听力理解测试认知诊断模型的最优选择
Front Psychol. 2021 Apr 16;12:608320. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.608320. eCollection 2021.
5
An Extensive Knowledge Mapping Review of Measurement and Validity in Language Assessment and SLA Research.语言评估与二语习得研究中测量与效度的广泛知识图谱综述
Front Psychol. 2020 Sep 4;11:1941. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01941. eCollection 2020.
6
A Meta-Analysis of the Reliability of Second Language Listening Tests (1991-2022).第二语言听力测试可靠性的元分析(1991 - 2022年)
Brain Sci. 2024 Jul 25;14(8):746. doi: 10.3390/brainsci14080746.
7
Second and foreign language listening: unraveling the construct.第二语言和外语听力:剖析这一概念。
Percept Mot Skills. 2008 Aug;107(1):99-113. doi: 10.2466/pms.107.1.99-113.
8
Construct Validity of the Ecological Momentary Assessment in Audiology Research.听力学研究中生态瞬时评估的结构效度
J Am Acad Audiol. 2015 Nov-Dec;26(10):872-84. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.15034.
9
The Implications of Cognitive Aging for Listening and the Framework for Understanding Effortful Listening (FUEL).认知衰老对听力的影响以及理解费力听力的框架(FUEL)。
Ear Hear. 2016 Jul-Aug;37 Suppl 1:44S-51S. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000309.
10
Student's Second-Language Grade May Depend on Classroom Listening Position.学生的第二语言成绩可能取决于课堂上的听力位置。
PLoS One. 2016 Jun 15;11(6):e0156533. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0156533. eCollection 2016.

引用本文的文献

1
A Meta-Analysis of the Reliability of Second Language Listening Tests (1991-2022).第二语言听力测试可靠性的元分析(1991 - 2022年)
Brain Sci. 2024 Jul 25;14(8):746. doi: 10.3390/brainsci14080746.

本文引用的文献

1
Relating Lexical and Syntactic Knowledge to Academic English Listening: The Importance of Construct Representation.将词汇和句法知识与学术英语听力相联系:结构表征的重要性。
Front Psychol. 2020 Mar 31;11:494. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00494. eCollection 2020.
2
The Mediating Effect of Listening Metacognitive Awareness between Test-Taking Motivation and Listening Test Score: An Expectancy-Value Theory Approach.听力元认知意识在应试动机与听力测试成绩之间的中介作用:一种期望 - 价值理论视角
Front Psychol. 2017 Dec 22;8:2201. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02201. eCollection 2017.
3
The interlanguage speech intelligibility benefit.中介语言语可懂度优势。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2003 Sep;114(3):1600-10. doi: 10.1121/1.1603234.
4
Expectancy-Value Theory of Achievement Motivation.成就动机的期望-价值理论
Contemp Educ Psychol. 2000 Jan;25(1):68-81. doi: 10.1006/ceps.1999.1015.

二十年来第二语言听力评估:社会认知框架内的综述

Assessing Second Language Listening Over the Past Twenty Years: A Review Within the Socio-Cognitive Framework.

作者信息

He Lianzhen, Jiang Ziyun

机构信息

Institute of Applied Linguistics, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2020 Sep 3;11:2123. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02123. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02123
PMID:33013539
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7494779/
Abstract

The assessment of second language (L2) listening has received much attention. To understand the state-of-the-art research on L2 listening assessment, a total of 87 studies published in 14 peer-reviewed journals and two research report series between 2001 and 2020 were reviewed, using the socio-cognitive framework for developing and validating listening tests proposed by Weir (2005). Thirteen research themes were identified in relation to the six components of the framework, including test-taker characteristics, cognitive validity, context validity, scoring validity, consequential validity, and criterion-related validity. Context validity was the most investigated component, covering three research themes, that is, task setting, linguistic demands (input and output), and speakers. Based on a detailed analysis of the 13 research themes, recommendations for future research in L2 listening assessment were given.

摘要

第二语言(L2)听力评估受到了广泛关注。为了解L2听力评估的前沿研究,我们使用Weir(2005)提出的用于开发和验证听力测试的社会认知框架,对2001年至2020年间发表在14种同行评审期刊和两个研究报告系列中的87项研究进行了综述。围绕该框架的六个组成部分确定了13个研究主题,包括考生特征、认知效度、情境效度、评分效度、结果效度和标准关联效度。情境效度是研究最多的组成部分,涵盖三个研究主题,即任务设置、语言要求(输入和输出)以及说话者。在对这13个研究主题进行详细分析的基础上,给出了L2听力评估未来研究的建议。