• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
An Optimal Choice of Cognitive Diagnostic Model for Second Language Listening Comprehension Test.第二语言听力理解测试认知诊断模型的最优选择
Front Psychol. 2021 Apr 16;12:608320. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.608320. eCollection 2021.
2
Model Similarity, Model Selection, and Attribute Classification.模型相似性、模型选择与属性分类。
Appl Psychol Meas. 2016 May;40(3):200-217. doi: 10.1177/0146621615621717. Epub 2016 Jan 18.
3
Cognitive diagnostic assessment of EFL learners' listening barriers through incorrect responses.通过错误回答对英语外语学习者听力障碍进行认知诊断评估。
Front Psychol. 2023 Aug 17;14:1126106. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1126106. eCollection 2023.
4
Validating a Reading Assessment Within the Cognitive Diagnostic Assessment Framework: Q-Matrix Construction and Model Comparisons for Different Primary Grades.
Front Psychol. 2021 Dec 16;12:786612. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.786612. eCollection 2021.
5
Determining the Number of Attributes in Cognitive Diagnosis Modeling.确定认知诊断建模中的属性数量。
Front Psychol. 2021 Feb 15;12:614470. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.614470. eCollection 2021.
6
On the Sequential Hierarchical Cognitive Diagnostic Model.论序列分层认知诊断模型
Front Psychol. 2020 Oct 7;11:579018. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.579018. eCollection 2020.
7
Examining the Impact of Differential Item Functioning on Classification Accuracy in Cognitive Diagnostic Models.检验认知诊断模型中项目功能差异对分类准确性的影响。
Appl Psychol Meas. 2020 Jun;44(4):267-281. doi: 10.1177/0146621619858675. Epub 2019 Jul 4.
8
The Interactive Model of L2 Listening Processing in Chinese Bilinguals: A Multiple Mediation Analysis.中国双语者二语听力加工的交互模型:多重中介分析
Front Psychol. 2022 Apr 8;13:871349. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.871349. eCollection 2022.
9
Research on the Cognitive Diagnosis of Chinese Listening Comprehension Ability Based on the G-DINA Model.基于G-DINA模型的汉语听力理解能力认知诊断研究
Front Psychol. 2021 Sep 7;12:714568. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.714568. eCollection 2021.
10
A Tutorial on Cognitive Diagnosis Modeling for Characterizing Mental Health Symptom Profiles Using Existing Item Responses.使用现有项目反应对心理健康症状特征进行认知诊断建模的教程。
Prev Sci. 2023 Apr;24(3):480-492. doi: 10.1007/s11121-022-01346-8. Epub 2022 Feb 3.

引用本文的文献

1
A cognitive diagnosis model for disengaged behaviors.一种针对脱离行为的认知诊断模型。
Behav Res Methods. 2025 Jul 1;57(8):213. doi: 10.3758/s13428-025-02734-y.
2
Memetic ant colony optimization for multi-constrained cognitive diagnostic test construction.用于多约束认知诊断测试构建的模因蚁群优化算法
Health Inf Sci Syst. 2024 Nov 16;12(1):56. doi: 10.1007/s13755-024-00314-6. eCollection 2024 Dec.
3
Cognitive diagnostic assessment of EFL learners' listening barriers through incorrect responses.通过错误回答对英语外语学习者听力障碍进行认知诊断评估。
Front Psychol. 2023 Aug 17;14:1126106. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1126106. eCollection 2023.
4
Improving reliability estimation in cognitive diagnosis modeling.提高认知诊断建模中的可靠性估计
Behav Res Methods. 2023 Oct;55(7):3446-3460. doi: 10.3758/s13428-022-01967-5. Epub 2022 Sep 20.
5
Exploring the Role of English as a Foreign Language Receptive Skills and Learning Strategy Usage in the Ability to Acquire and Apply Knowledge at the Beginning of Higher Education.探索高等教育初期作为外语的英语接受技能和学习策略运用在获取和应用知识能力方面的作用。
Front Psychol. 2022 May 30;13:808546. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.808546. eCollection 2022.
6
Assessing Students' Translation Competence: Integrating China's Standards of English With Cognitive Diagnostic Assessment Approaches.
Front Psychol. 2022 Mar 31;13:872025. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.872025. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Model Similarity, Model Selection, and Attribute Classification.模型相似性、模型选择与属性分类。
Appl Psychol Meas. 2016 May;40(3):200-217. doi: 10.1177/0146621615621717. Epub 2016 Jan 18.
2
Measurement of psychological disorders using cognitive diagnosis models.使用认知诊断模型测量心理障碍。
Psychol Methods. 2006 Sep;11(3):287-305. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.11.3.287.

第二语言听力理解测试认知诊断模型的最优选择

An Optimal Choice of Cognitive Diagnostic Model for Second Language Listening Comprehension Test.

作者信息

Dong Yanyun, Ma Xiaomei, Wang Chuang, Gao Xuliang

机构信息

School of Foreign Studies, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.

Faculty of Education, University of Macau, Taipa, China.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2021 Apr 16;12:608320. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.608320. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.608320
PMID:33935863
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8085248/
Abstract

Cognitive diagnostic models (CDMs) show great promise in language assessment for providing rich diagnostic information. The lack of a full understanding of second language (L2) listening subskills made model selection difficult. In search of optimal CDM(s) that could provide a better understanding of L2 listening subskills and facilitate accurate classification, this study carried a two-layer model selection. At the test level, A-CDM, LLM, and R-RUM had an acceptable and comparable model fit, suggesting mixed inter-attribute relationships of L2 listening subskills. At the item level, Mixed-CDMs were selected and confirmed the existence of mixed relationships. Mixed-CDMs had better model and person fit than G-DNIA. In addition to statistical approaches, the content analysis provided theoretical evidence to confirm and amend the item-level CDMs. It was found that semantic completeness pertaining to the attributes and item features may influence the attribute relationships. Inexplicable attribute conflicts could be a signal of suboptimal model choice. Sample size and the number of multi-attribute items should be taken into account in L2 listening cognitive diagnostic modeling studies. This study provides useful insights into the model selection and the underlying cognitive process for L2 listening tests.

摘要

认知诊断模型(CDMs)在语言评估中展现出巨大潜力,能够提供丰富的诊断信息。由于对第二语言(L2)听力子技能缺乏全面理解,使得模型选择变得困难。为了寻找能够更好地理解L2听力子技能并促进准确分类的最优CDM,本研究进行了两层模型选择。在测试层面,A-CDM、LLM和R-RUM具有可接受且可比的模型拟合度,这表明L2听力子技能存在混合的属性间关系。在项目层面,选择了混合CDM并证实了混合关系的存在。混合CDM的模型和个体拟合度优于G-DNIA。除了统计方法外,内容分析提供了理论证据来确认和修正项目层面的CDM。研究发现,与属性和项目特征相关的语义完整性可能会影响属性关系。无法解释的属性冲突可能是模型选择欠佳的信号。在L2听力认知诊断建模研究中应考虑样本量和多属性项目的数量。本研究为L2听力测试的模型选择和潜在认知过程提供了有益的见解。