Dong Yanyun, Ma Xiaomei, Wang Chuang, Gao Xuliang
School of Foreign Studies, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Faculty of Education, University of Macau, Taipa, China.
Front Psychol. 2021 Apr 16;12:608320. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.608320. eCollection 2021.
Cognitive diagnostic models (CDMs) show great promise in language assessment for providing rich diagnostic information. The lack of a full understanding of second language (L2) listening subskills made model selection difficult. In search of optimal CDM(s) that could provide a better understanding of L2 listening subskills and facilitate accurate classification, this study carried a two-layer model selection. At the test level, A-CDM, LLM, and R-RUM had an acceptable and comparable model fit, suggesting mixed inter-attribute relationships of L2 listening subskills. At the item level, Mixed-CDMs were selected and confirmed the existence of mixed relationships. Mixed-CDMs had better model and person fit than G-DNIA. In addition to statistical approaches, the content analysis provided theoretical evidence to confirm and amend the item-level CDMs. It was found that semantic completeness pertaining to the attributes and item features may influence the attribute relationships. Inexplicable attribute conflicts could be a signal of suboptimal model choice. Sample size and the number of multi-attribute items should be taken into account in L2 listening cognitive diagnostic modeling studies. This study provides useful insights into the model selection and the underlying cognitive process for L2 listening tests.
认知诊断模型(CDMs)在语言评估中展现出巨大潜力,能够提供丰富的诊断信息。由于对第二语言(L2)听力子技能缺乏全面理解,使得模型选择变得困难。为了寻找能够更好地理解L2听力子技能并促进准确分类的最优CDM,本研究进行了两层模型选择。在测试层面,A-CDM、LLM和R-RUM具有可接受且可比的模型拟合度,这表明L2听力子技能存在混合的属性间关系。在项目层面,选择了混合CDM并证实了混合关系的存在。混合CDM的模型和个体拟合度优于G-DNIA。除了统计方法外,内容分析提供了理论证据来确认和修正项目层面的CDM。研究发现,与属性和项目特征相关的语义完整性可能会影响属性关系。无法解释的属性冲突可能是模型选择欠佳的信号。在L2听力认知诊断建模研究中应考虑样本量和多属性项目的数量。本研究为L2听力测试的模型选择和潜在认知过程提供了有益的见解。