Mendes Renata de S, Martins Gloria, Oliveira Milena V, Rocha Nazareth N, Cruz Fernanda F, Antunes Mariana A, Abreu Soraia C, Silva Adriana L, Takiya Christina, Pimentel-Coelho Pedro M, Robba Chiara, Mendez-Otero Rosália, Pelosi Paolo, Rocco Patricia R M, Silva Pedro L
Laboratory of Pulmonary Investigation, Institute of Biophysics Carlos Chagas Filho, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Laboratory of Imunophysiology, Institute of Biophysics Carlos Chagas Filho, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Front Neurol. 2020 Sep 3;11:1001. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.01001. eCollection 2020.
There is widespread debate regarding the use of albumin in ischemic stroke. We tested the hypothesis that an iso-oncotic solution of albumin (5%), administered earlier after acute ischemic stroke (3 h), could provide neuroprotection without causing kidney damage, compared to a hyper-oncotic albumin (20%) and saline. To compare the effects of saline, iso-oncotic albumin, and hyper-oncotic albumin, all titrated to similar hemodynamic targets, on the brain and kidney. Ischemic stroke was induced in anesthetized male Wistar rats ( = 30; weight 437 ± 68 g) by thermocoagulation of pial blood vessels of the primary somatosensory, motor, and sensorimotor cortices. After 3 h, animals were anesthetized and randomly assigned ( = 8) to receive 0.9% NaCl (Saline), iso-oncotic albumin (5% ALB), and hyper-oncotic albumin (20% ALB), aiming to maintain hemodynamic stability (defined as distensibility index of inferior vena cava <25%, mean arterial pressure >80 mmHg). Rats were then ventilated using protective strategies for 2 h. Of these 30 animals, 6 were used as controls (focal ischemic stroke/no fluid). The total fluid volume infused was higher in the Saline group than in the 5% ALB and 20% ALB groups (mean ± SD, 4.3 ± 1.6 . 2.7 ± 0.6 and 2.6 ± 0.5 mL, = 0.03 and = 0.02, respectively). The total albumin volume infused (g/kg) was higher in the 20% ALB group than in the 5% ALB group (1.4 ± 0.6 . 0.4 ± 0.2, < 0.001). Saline increased neurodegeneration (Fluoro-Jade C staining), brain inflammation in the penumbra (higher tumor necrosis factor-alpha expression), and blood-brain barrier damage (lower gene expressions of claudin-1 and zona occludens-1) compared to both iso-oncotic and hyper-oncotic albumins, whereas it reduced the expression of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (a marker of neuroregeneration) compared only to iso-oncotic albumin. In the kidney, hyper-oncotic albumin led to greater damage as well as higher gene expressions of kidney injury molecule-1 and interleukin-6 than 5% ALB ( < 0.001). In this model of focal ischemic stroke, only iso-oncotic albumin had a protective effect against brain and kidney damage. Fluid therapy thus requires careful analysis of impact not only on the brain but also on the kidney.
关于在缺血性卒中中使用白蛋白存在广泛的争论。我们检验了这样一个假设:与高渗白蛋白(20%)和生理盐水相比,在急性缺血性卒中(3小时)后更早给予等渗白蛋白溶液(5%)可提供神经保护且不会导致肾损伤。为比较生理盐水、等渗白蛋白和高渗白蛋白在滴定至相似血流动力学目标时对脑和肾的影响。通过热凝初级体感、运动和感觉运动皮层的软脑膜血管,在麻醉的雄性Wistar大鼠(n = 30;体重437±68克)中诱导缺血性卒中。3小时后,将动物麻醉并随机分组(n = 8),分别接受0.9%氯化钠(生理盐水)、等渗白蛋白(5%白蛋白)和高渗白蛋白(20%白蛋白),旨在维持血流动力学稳定(定义为下腔静脉扩张指数<25%,平均动脉压>80 mmHg)。然后使用保护性策略对大鼠进行2小时通气。在这30只动物中,6只用作对照(局灶性缺血性卒中/未补液)。生理盐水组输注的总液体量高于5%白蛋白组和20%白蛋白组(均值±标准差,分别为4.3±1.6、2.7±0.6和2.6±0.5 mL,P = 0.03和P = 0.02)。20%白蛋白组输注的总白蛋白量(克/千克)高于5%白蛋白组(1.4±0.6、0.4±0.2,P<0.001)。与等渗和高渗白蛋白相比,生理盐水增加了神经变性(Fluoro-Jade C染色)、半暗带中的脑炎症(肿瘤坏死因子-α表达更高)和血脑屏障损伤(claudin-1和紧密连接蛋白-1的基因表达更低),而与等渗白蛋白相比,它仅降低了脑源性神经营养因子(神经再生标志物)的表达。在肾脏中,高渗白蛋白导致的损伤以及肾损伤分子-1和白细胞介素-6的基因表达高于5%白蛋白组(P<0.001)。在这个局灶性缺血性卒中模型中,只有等渗白蛋白对脑和肾损伤具有保护作用。因此,液体治疗不仅需要仔细分析对脑的影响,还需要分析对肾的影响。