Luengo María, García-Marín David
Department of Communication, Carlos III University, 133, Getafe, 28903 Madrid, Spain.
Am J Cult Sociol. 2020;8(3):405-427. doi: 10.1057/s41290-020-00115-w. Epub 2020 Sep 28.
Since the World Health Organization (WHO, February 2, 2020) reported that the spread of coronavirus disease has been accompanied by a "massive infodemic," the COVID-19 outbreak has become a national and international battleground of a struggle against misinformation. Fact-checking outlets around the world have been actively counteracting false and misleading information surrounding the pandemic. In this article, we conceptualize fact checkers in terms of the "interpretative power" that journalism holds in processes of political performances (Alexander in Soc Theory 22(4): 527-573, 2004, in: The performance of politics. Obama's victory and the struggle for democratic power. Oxford University Press, Oxford/New York, 2010). Drawing on virus-related fact checks from Poynter's International Fact-Checking Network (IFCN) database, we make two arguments. First, we argue that the new phenomenon of specialized "fact checking" might be considered as a further explicitly differentiated element of Alexander's model of cultural performance, which fulfills a double duty: trying to contribute to further "de-fusion" (separating audiences from actors when the latter lack authenticity and credibility) on the one hand, and working to overcome it on the other. Second, we explain how new fact-checking practices have become a reflexive supplement to the news media of the civil sphere that might be able to help the civil sphere's communicative institutions to defend truthfulness in a manner that contributes to democracy.
自世界卫生组织(2020年2月2日)报告称冠状病毒病的传播伴随着“大规模信息疫情”以来,新冠疫情已成为一场反对错误信息斗争的国内和国际战场。世界各地的事实核查机构一直在积极抵制围绕这一疫情的虚假和误导性信息。在本文中,我们根据新闻业在政治表演过程中所具有的“解释力”(亚历山大,《社会理论》22(4): 527 - 573, 2004年,载于《政治表演:奥巴马的胜利与民主权力的斗争》,牛津大学出版社,牛津/纽约,2010年)来对事实核查机构进行概念化。借鉴皮尤研究中心国际事实核查网络(IFCN)数据库中与病毒相关的事实核查,我们提出两个观点。首先,我们认为专门的“事实核查”这一新现象可被视为亚历山大文化表演模式中一个进一步明确分化的元素,它履行双重职责:一方面试图促成进一步的“去融合”(当行为者缺乏真实性和可信度时,将受众与行为者分离),另一方面努力克服这种情况。其次,我们解释了新的事实核查实践如何成为公民领域新闻媒体的一种反思性补充,这种补充或许能够帮助公民领域的传播机构以有助于民主的方式捍卫真实性。