• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

真相的表现:政治家、事实核查新闻报道以及应对新冠疫情错误信息的斗争

The performance of truth: politicians, fact-checking journalism, and the struggle to tackle COVID-19 misinformation.

作者信息

Luengo María, García-Marín David

机构信息

Department of Communication, Carlos III University, 133, Getafe, 28903 Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Am J Cult Sociol. 2020;8(3):405-427. doi: 10.1057/s41290-020-00115-w. Epub 2020 Sep 28.

DOI:10.1057/s41290-020-00115-w
PMID:33014362
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7520375/
Abstract

Since the World Health Organization (WHO, February 2, 2020) reported that the spread of coronavirus disease has been accompanied by a "massive infodemic," the COVID-19 outbreak has become a national and international battleground of a struggle against misinformation. Fact-checking outlets around the world have been actively counteracting false and misleading information surrounding the pandemic. In this article, we conceptualize fact checkers in terms of the "interpretative power" that journalism holds in processes of political performances (Alexander in Soc Theory 22(4): 527-573, 2004, in: The performance of politics. Obama's victory and the struggle for democratic power. Oxford University Press, Oxford/New York, 2010). Drawing on virus-related fact checks from Poynter's International Fact-Checking Network (IFCN) database, we make two arguments. First, we argue that the new phenomenon of specialized "fact checking" might be considered as a further explicitly differentiated element of Alexander's model of cultural performance, which fulfills a double duty: trying to contribute to further "de-fusion" (separating audiences from actors when the latter lack authenticity and credibility) on the one hand, and working to overcome it on the other. Second, we explain how new fact-checking practices have become a reflexive supplement to the news media of the civil sphere that might be able to help the civil sphere's communicative institutions to defend truthfulness in a manner that contributes to democracy.

摘要

自世界卫生组织(2020年2月2日)报告称冠状病毒病的传播伴随着“大规模信息疫情”以来,新冠疫情已成为一场反对错误信息斗争的国内和国际战场。世界各地的事实核查机构一直在积极抵制围绕这一疫情的虚假和误导性信息。在本文中,我们根据新闻业在政治表演过程中所具有的“解释力”(亚历山大,《社会理论》22(4): 527 - 573, 2004年,载于《政治表演:奥巴马的胜利与民主权力的斗争》,牛津大学出版社,牛津/纽约,2010年)来对事实核查机构进行概念化。借鉴皮尤研究中心国际事实核查网络(IFCN)数据库中与病毒相关的事实核查,我们提出两个观点。首先,我们认为专门的“事实核查”这一新现象可被视为亚历山大文化表演模式中一个进一步明确分化的元素,它履行双重职责:一方面试图促成进一步的“去融合”(当行为者缺乏真实性和可信度时,将受众与行为者分离),另一方面努力克服这种情况。其次,我们解释了新的事实核查实践如何成为公民领域新闻媒体的一种反思性补充,这种补充或许能够帮助公民领域的传播机构以有助于民主的方式捍卫真实性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d17/7520375/6204dadb6821/41290_2020_115_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d17/7520375/6204dadb6821/41290_2020_115_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d17/7520375/6204dadb6821/41290_2020_115_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The performance of truth: politicians, fact-checking journalism, and the struggle to tackle COVID-19 misinformation.真相的表现:政治家、事实核查新闻报道以及应对新冠疫情错误信息的斗争
Am J Cult Sociol. 2020;8(3):405-427. doi: 10.1057/s41290-020-00115-w. Epub 2020 Sep 28.
2
Identifying Frames of the COVID-19 Infodemic: Thematic Analysis of Misinformation Stories Across Media.识别新冠疫情信息疫情的框架:跨媒体错误信息报道的主题分析
JMIR Infodemiology. 2022 Apr 13;2(1):e33827. doi: 10.2196/33827. eCollection 2022 Jan-Jun.
3
Cross-checking journalistic fact-checkers: The role of sampling and scaling in interpreting false and misleading statements.交叉核对新闻事实核查者:解释虚假和误导性陈述中抽样和定标的作用。
PLoS One. 2023 Jul 25;18(7):e0289004. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289004. eCollection 2023.
4
Fact-Checking Journalism: A Palliative Against the COVID-19 Infodemic in Ibero-America.事实核查新闻:对抗伊比利亚美洲新冠疫情信息疫情的一剂良药。
Journal Mass Commun Q. 2023 Jun;100(2):264-285. doi: 10.1177/10776990231164168. Epub 2023 Apr 24.
5
COVID-19 Misinformation Detection: Machine-Learned Solutions to the Infodemic.新冠疫情错误信息检测:针对信息疫情的机器学习解决方案
JMIR Infodemiology. 2022 Aug 25;2(2):e38756. doi: 10.2196/38756. eCollection 2022 Jul-Dec.
6
Combating Misinformation by Sharing the Truth: a Study on the Spread of Fact-Checks on Social Media.通过分享真相来对抗错误信息:一项关于事实核查在社交媒体上传播的研究。
Inf Syst Front. 2022 Jun 11:1-15. doi: 10.1007/s10796-022-10296-z.
7
COVID-19 Infodemic: A study on the Fragile Five countries.新冠疫情信息疫情:对“脆弱五国”的一项研究。
J Public Aff. 2022 Nov 30:e2846. doi: 10.1002/pa.2846.
8
Demographics and topics impact on the co-spread of COVID-19 misinformation and fact-checks on Twitter.人口统计学和话题对推特上新冠疫情错误信息与事实核查的共同传播产生影响。
Inf Process Manag. 2021 Nov;58(6):102732. doi: 10.1016/j.ipm.2021.102732. Epub 2021 Aug 30.
9
COVID-19 vaccine misinformation in English-language news media: retrospective cohort study.英文新闻媒体中的 COVID-19 疫苗错误信息:回顾性队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jun 1;12(6):e058956. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058956.
10
Community notes increase trust in fact-checking on social media.社区笔记增强了对社交媒体上事实核查的信任。
PNAS Nexus. 2024 May 31;3(7):pgae217. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae217. eCollection 2024 Jul.

引用本文的文献

1
From knowledge generation to knowledge verification: examining the biomedical generative capabilities of ChatGPT.从知识生成到知识验证:审视ChatGPT的生物医学生成能力。
iScience. 2025 Apr 21;28(6):112492. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2025.112492. eCollection 2025 Jun 20.
2
Emerging priorities and concerns in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic: qualitative and quantitative findings from a United States national survey.COVID-19 大流行之后浮现的重点和关切事项:一项美国全国性调查的定性和定量结果。
Front Public Health. 2024 Jun 19;12:1365657. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1365657. eCollection 2024.
3
Closing the Barn Door? Fact-Checkers as Retroactive Gatekeepers of the COVID-19 "Infodemic".

本文引用的文献

1
Post-truth?后真相?
Soc Stud Sci. 2017 Feb;47(1):3-6. doi: 10.1177/0306312717692076.
亡羊补牢?事实核查员作为新冠疫情“信息疫情”的追溯把关人
Journal Mass Commun Q. 2023 Jun;100(2):332-353. doi: 10.1177/10776990231168599. Epub 2023 Apr 20.
4
Agenda-Setting for COVID-19: A Study of Large-Scale Economic News Coverage Using Natural Language Processing.新冠疫情的议程设置:一项运用自然语言处理技术对大规模经济新闻报道的研究
Int J Data Sci Anal. 2023;15(3):291-312. doi: 10.1007/s41060-022-00364-7. Epub 2022 Oct 6.
5
The Continuity of the Social Sciences During COVID-19: Sociology and Interdisciplinarity in Pandemic Times.新冠疫情期间社会科学的连续性:大流行时代的社会学与跨学科性
Society. 2022;59(6):735-746. doi: 10.1007/s12115-022-00763-3. Epub 2022 Aug 25.
6
Impact of COVID-19 Vaccine Misinformation on Social Media Virality: Content Analysis of Message Themes and Writing Strategies.社交媒体上 COVID-19 疫苗错误信息的传播影响:信息主题和写作策略的内容分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Jul 6;24(7):e37806. doi: 10.2196/37806.
7
The Mutual Influence of the World Health Organization (WHO) and Twitter Users During COVID-19: Network Agenda-Setting Analysis.世界卫生组织(WHO)与推特用户在 COVID-19 期间的相互影响:网络议程设置分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Apr 26;24(4):e34321. doi: 10.2196/34321.
8
Why Do Citizens Share COVID-19 Fact-Checks Posted by Chinese Government Social Media Accounts? The Elaboration Likelihood Model.为什么公民会分享中国政府社交媒体账号发布的新冠疫情事实核查信息?精细加工可能性模型。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Sep 24;18(19):10058. doi: 10.3390/ijerph181910058.
9
Communication vs evidence: What hinders the outreach of science during an infodemic? A narrative review.传播与证据:在信息疫情期间,是什么阻碍了科学的传播?一项叙述性综述。
Integr Med Res. 2021 Dec;10(4):100731. doi: 10.1016/j.imr.2021.100731. Epub 2021 May 17.