Rodríguez Anabel, Biarnés Marc, Coco-Martin Rosa M, Sala-Puigdollers Anna, Monés Jordi
Institut de la Màcula Centro Médico Teknon, Barcelona, Spain.
Barcelona Macula Foundation, Barcelona, Spain.
J Ophthalmol. 2020 Sep 16;2020:9457457. doi: 10.1155/2020/9457457. eCollection 2020.
This study aims to find out which tool, fundus autofluorescence (FAF) or spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT), is more sensitive in detecting retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) demise overlying drusen and can, therefore, help predict geographic atrophy (GA) appearance in Age-Related Macular Degeneration (AMD).
A single-site, retrospective, observational, longitudinal study was conducted. Patients with intermediate AMD (iAMD) (large (>125 m) or intermediate (63-125 m) drusen with hyper/hypopigmentation) with a minimum follow-up of 18 months were included. Drusen with overlying incipient RPE atrophy were identified on SD-OCT defined as choroidal hypertransmission or nascent geographic atrophy (nGA). These selected drusen were, then, traced backwards in time to determine if incipient RPE atrophy overlying drusen was observed on FAF (well-demarcated region of absence of autofluorescence) before, simultaneously, or after having detected the first signs of incipient RPE atrophy on SD-OCT. The number of drusen in which signs of incipient RPE atrophy was detected earlier using FAF or SD-OCT was compared. The time elapsed from the identification with the more sensitive method to the other was recorded and analyzed.
One hundred and thirty-three drusen in 22 eyes of 22 patients were included. Of these, 112 (84.2%) drusen showed choroidal hypertransmission and 21(15.8%) nGA. Early signs of atrophy overlying drusen were found simultaneously on SD-OCT and FAF in 52 cases (39.1%, 95% CI 30.8-47.9%), earliest on FAF in 51 (38.3%, 95% CI 30.0-47.2%) and first on SD-OCT in 30 (22.6%, 95% CI 15.8-30.6%; < 0.05). Statistically significant differences were found between both techniques (=0.005), with FAF detecting it earlier than SD-OCT. When RPE atrophy was found first on FAF, the median time to diagnosis with SD-OCT was 6.6 months (95% CI 5.5 to 8.6), while if detection occurred earlier on SD-OCT, the median time until identification with FAF was 12.6 months (95% CI 6.0 to 23.4; =0.0003).
In iAMD cases in which early atrophy overlying drusen is not detected simultaneously in FAF and SD-OCT, FAF was significantly more sensitive. Nevertheless, a multimodal approach is recommended and required to evaluate these patients.
本研究旨在找出哪种工具,即眼底自发荧光(FAF)或光谱域光学相干断层扫描(SD-OCT),在检测玻璃膜疣上方的视网膜色素上皮(RPE)死亡方面更敏感,从而有助于预测年龄相关性黄斑变性(AMD)中地图样萎缩(GA)的出现。
进行了一项单中心、回顾性、观察性纵向研究。纳入中度AMD(iAMD)患者(大玻璃膜疣(>125μm)或中度玻璃膜疣(63 - 125μm)伴色素沉着过多/过少),随访至少18个月。在SD-OCT上确定玻璃膜疣上方存在初期RPE萎缩,定义为脉络膜高透过或新生地图样萎缩(nGA)。然后,对这些选定的玻璃膜疣进行时间追溯,以确定在SD-OCT上检测到初期RPE萎缩的首个迹象之前、同时或之后,在FAF上是否观察到玻璃膜疣上方的初期RPE萎缩(明确界定的自发荧光缺失区域)。比较使用FAF或SD-OCT更早检测到初期RPE萎缩迹象的玻璃膜疣数量。记录并分析从用更敏感方法识别到另一种方法识别所经过的时间。
纳入22例患者22只眼中的133个玻璃膜疣。其中,112个(84.2%)玻璃膜疣显示脉络膜高透过,21个(15.8%)为nGA。52例(39.1%,95%可信区间30.8 - 47.9%)玻璃膜疣上方的萎缩早期迹象在SD-OCT和FAF上同时发现,51个(38.3%,95%可信区间30.0 - 47.2%)最早在FAF上发现,30个(22.6%,95%可信区间15.8 - 30.6%;P<0.05)最早在SD-OCT上发现。两种技术之间存在统计学显著差异(P = 0.005),FAF比SD-OCT更早检测到。当首先在FAF上发现RPE萎缩时,用SD-OCT诊断的中位时间为6.6个月(95%可信区间5.5至8.6),而如果在SD-OCT上更早检测到,则用FAF识别的中位时间为12.6个月(95%可信区间6.0至23.4;P = 0.0003)。
在iAMD病例中,若在FAF和SD-OCT上未同时检测到玻璃膜疣上方的早期萎缩,FAF明显更敏感。然而,建议并需要采用多模态方法来评估这些患者。