• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

体表心电图上的心肌瘢痕:塞尔维斯特评分而非碎裂情况可预测心脏再同步化治疗的反应。

Myocardial Scar on Surface ECG: Selvester Score, but Not Fragmentation, Predicts Response to CRT.

作者信息

Nesti Martina, Perini Alessandro Paoletti, Bani Rossella, Cartei Stella, Checchi Luca, Ricciardi Giuseppe, Pieragnoli Paolo, Michelotti Federica, Mascioli Giosuè, Cavarretta Elena, Sciarra Luigi

机构信息

Cardiovascular and Neurological Department, San Donato Hospital, Arezzo, Italy.

Cardiology and Electrophysiology Unit, Santa Maria Nuova Hospital, Florence, Italy.

出版信息

Cardiol Res Pract. 2020 Sep 21;2020:2036545. doi: 10.1155/2020/2036545. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.1155/2020/2036545
PMID:33014454
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7525300/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Myocardial scar is directly related to the response to CRT after implantation. The extent of myocardial scar can be detected not only by cardiac magnetic resonance but also by two electrocardiographic scores: fragmented QRS (fQRS) and Selvester score (SSc). The aim of our study is to compare the role of baseline SSc and fQRS in predicting response to CRT in a cohort of heart failure patients with true left bundle branch block (LBBB). As a secondary endpoint, we assessed the association of both scores with overall and cardiac mortality, heart failure hospitalizations, ventricular arrhythmias requiring ICD intervention, and major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE).

METHODS

We evaluated fQRS and SSc of 178 consecutive HF patients with severe systolic dysfunction (LVEF ≤ 35%), NYHA class II-III despite optimal medical treatment, and true-LBBB. Response to CRT was defined as the improvement of LVEF of at least 10% or as the reduction of LVESV of at least 15% at a 6-month follow-up. Each endpoint was related to fQRS and SSc.

RESULTS

SSc ≥7 was significantly associated with the absence of echocardiographic response to CRT (OR: 0.327; 95% C.I. 0.155-0.689; =0.003), while the presence of fQRS at baseline ECG was not (OR: 1.133; 95% C.I. 0.539-2.381; =0.742). No correlation was found between SSc and overall mortality, cardiac death, ventricular arrhythmias, hospitalizations due to heart failure, or for MACE. Similar results were observed between fQRS and all secondary endpoints.

CONCLUSION

In HF patients with true-LBBB and LVEF ≤35% eligible for CRT, myocardial scar assessed by calculating the SSc on preimplant ECG is an independent predictor of nonresponse after multiple adjustments. Neither SSc nor fQRS is associated with overall and cardiac death, ventricular arrhythmias, or hospitalization for heart failure at a 24-month follow-up.

摘要

目的

心肌瘢痕与植入心脏再同步化治疗(CRT)后的反应直接相关。心肌瘢痕的范围不仅可以通过心脏磁共振检测,还可以通过两种心电图评分来检测:碎裂QRS波(fQRS)和塞尔维斯特评分(SSc)。我们研究的目的是比较基线SSc和fQRS在预测一组真正左束支传导阻滞(LBBB)心力衰竭患者对CRT反应中的作用。作为次要终点,我们评估了这两种评分与全因死亡率、心源性死亡率、心力衰竭住院率、需要植入式心律转复除颤器(ICD)干预的室性心律失常以及主要不良心血管事件(MACE)之间的关联。

方法

我们评估了178例连续的心力衰竭患者的fQRS和SSc,这些患者有严重的收缩功能障碍(左心室射血分数[LVEF]≤35%),尽管接受了最佳药物治疗,但纽约心脏协会(NYHA)心功能分级为II - III级,且为真正的LBBB。对CRT的反应定义为在6个月随访时LVEF至少提高10%或左心室舒张末期容积(LVESV)至少降低15%。每个终点都与fQRS和SSc相关。

结果

SSc≥7与CRT后超声心动图无反应显著相关(比值比[OR]:0.327;95%置信区间[C.I.] 0.155 - 0.689;P = 0.003),而基线心电图存在fQRS则无此相关性(OR:1.133;95% C.I. 0.539 - 2.381;P = 0.742)。在SSc与全因死亡率、心源性死亡、室性心律失常、心力衰竭住院或MACE之间未发现相关性。在fQRS与所有次要终点之间也观察到类似结果。

结论

在符合CRT标准的真正LBBB且LVEF≤35%的心力衰竭患者中,通过植入前心电图计算SSc评估的心肌瘢痕是多次调整后无反应的独立预测因素。在24个月随访时,SSc和fQRS均与全因死亡率、心源性死亡、室性心律失常或心力衰竭住院无关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bfc0/7525300/f14f4d686122/CRP2020-2036545.003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bfc0/7525300/eb09a46c008f/CRP2020-2036545.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bfc0/7525300/3db4e15b1dd0/CRP2020-2036545.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bfc0/7525300/f14f4d686122/CRP2020-2036545.003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bfc0/7525300/eb09a46c008f/CRP2020-2036545.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bfc0/7525300/3db4e15b1dd0/CRP2020-2036545.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bfc0/7525300/f14f4d686122/CRP2020-2036545.003.jpg

相似文献

1
Myocardial Scar on Surface ECG: Selvester Score, but Not Fragmentation, Predicts Response to CRT.体表心电图上的心肌瘢痕:塞尔维斯特评分而非碎裂情况可预测心脏再同步化治疗的反应。
Cardiol Res Pract. 2020 Sep 21;2020:2036545. doi: 10.1155/2020/2036545. eCollection 2020.
2
Simplified Selvester Score: a practical electrocardiographic instrument to predict response to CRT.
J Electrocardiol. 2015 Jan-Feb;48(1):62-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2014.10.014. Epub 2014 Nov 4.
3
The role of the fragmented QRS complexes on a routine 12-lead ECG in predicting non-responsiveness to cardiac resynchronization therapy.常规12导联心电图上碎裂QRS波群在预测心脏再同步治疗无反应性中的作用。
Anatol J Cardiol. 2015 Mar;15(3):204-8. doi: 10.5152/akd.2014.5307. Epub 2014 Apr 8.
4
Association between resolution of fragmented QRS and response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.碎裂QRS波的消退与心脏再同步治疗反应之间的关联。
Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2015 Mar;20(2):126-31. doi: 10.1111/anec.12186. Epub 2014 Jul 7.
5
QRS fragmentation is not associated with poor response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.QRS波碎裂与心脏再同步治疗反应不佳无关。
Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2011 Apr;16(2):165-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1542-474X.2011.00424.x.
6
Association of ECG characteristics with clinical and echocardiographic outcome to CRT in a non-LBBB patient population.非左束支传导阻滞患者人群中心电图特征与 CRT 临床和超声心动图结果的关系。
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2021 Oct;62(1):9-19. doi: 10.1007/s10840-020-00866-z. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
7
Evaluation of the ECG based Selvester scoring method to estimate myocardial scar burden and predict clinical outcome in patients with left bundle branch block, with comparison to late gadolinium enhancement CMR imaging.基于心电图的塞尔维斯特评分法评估左束支传导阻滞患者心肌瘢痕负荷及预测临床结局,并与钆增强延迟磁共振成像进行比较。
Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2017 Sep;22(5). doi: 10.1111/anec.12440. Epub 2017 Mar 1.
8
Evaluation of super-responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy in the presence of left bundle branch block and absence of scar in the posterolateral wall of the left ventricle.在存在左束支传导阻滞且左心室后外侧壁无瘢痕的情况下,对心脏再同步治疗超级反应者的评估。
Am J Cardiovasc Dis. 2020 Apr 15;10(1):17-27. eCollection 2020.
9
Cardiac resynchronization therapy response in heart failure patients with different subtypes of true left bundle branch block.不同亚型真性左束支传导阻滞心力衰竭患者的心脏再同步治疗反应
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2018 Jun;52(1):91-101. doi: 10.1007/s10840-018-0363-x. Epub 2018 Apr 3.
10
Role of electrocardiographic and echocardiographic types of left bundle branch block in prediction of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.心电图和超声心动图类型的左束支传导阻滞在预测心脏再同步治疗反应中的作用。
Ter Arkh. 2018 Dec 30;90(12):76-83. doi: 10.26442/00403660.2018.12.000012.

引用本文的文献

1
Selvester QRS Score is a Predictor of Mortality in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction.塞尔维斯特 QRS 评分是射血分数保留型心力衰竭患者死亡率的预测指标。
Arq Bras Cardiol. 2023 Oct 9;120(9):e20230235. doi: 10.36660/abc.20230235. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Refining success of cardiac resynchronization therapy using a simple score predicting the amount of reverse ventricular remodelling: results from the Markers and Response to CRT (MARC) study.利用简单的评分预测逆室重构程度来优化心脏再同步治疗的效果:来自标志物和心脏再同步治疗反应(MARC)研究的结果。
Europace. 2018 Feb 1;20(2):e1-e10. doi: 10.1093/europace/euw445.
2
Predictors of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy: A systematic review.心脏再同步治疗反应的预测因素:一项系统综述。
Int J Cardiol. 2016 Dec 15;225:345-352. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.09.078. Epub 2016 Sep 25.
3
ECG myocardial scar quantification predicts reverse left ventricular remodeling and survival after cardiac resynchronization therapy implantation: A retrospective pilot study.
心电图心肌瘢痕定量可预测心脏再同步治疗植入术后左心室逆向重构和生存率:一项回顾性初步研究。
J Electrocardiol. 2015 Jul-Aug;48(4):565-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2015.05.010. Epub 2015 May 8.
4
Simplified Selvester Score: a practical electrocardiographic instrument to predict response to CRT.
J Electrocardiol. 2015 Jan-Feb;48(1):62-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2014.10.014. Epub 2014 Nov 4.
5
Vectorcardiographic QRS area as a novel predictor of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.向量心电图QRS面积作为心脏再同步治疗反应的一种新预测指标。
J Electrocardiol. 2015 Jan-Feb;48(1):45-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2014.10.003. Epub 2014 Oct 24.
6
The role of the fragmented QRS complexes on a routine 12-lead ECG in predicting non-responsiveness to cardiac resynchronization therapy.常规12导联心电图上碎裂QRS波群在预测心脏再同步治疗无反应性中的作用。
Anatol J Cardiol. 2015 Mar;15(3):204-8. doi: 10.5152/akd.2014.5307. Epub 2014 Apr 8.
7
Association between resolution of fragmented QRS and response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.碎裂QRS波的消退与心脏再同步治疗反应之间的关联。
Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2015 Mar;20(2):126-31. doi: 10.1111/anec.12186. Epub 2014 Jul 7.
8
ECG quantification of myocardial scar and risk stratification in MADIT-II.心肌梗死二级预防试验(MADIT-II)中心肌瘢痕的心电图定量分析及风险分层
Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2013 Sep;18(5):427-35. doi: 10.1111/anec.12065. Epub 2013 Jun 9.
9
Fragmented QRS predicts cardiovascular death of patients with structural heart disease and inducible ventricular tachyarrhythmia.碎裂 QRS 波预测结构性心脏病和可诱导性室性心律失常患者的心血管死亡。
Circ J. 2013;77(12):2889-97. doi: 10.1253/circj.cj-13-0335. Epub 2013 Aug 13.
10
Localization of myocardial scar in patients with cardiomyopathy and left bundle branch block using electrocardiographic Selvester QRS scoring.使用心电图塞尔维斯特QRS评分法对心肌病合并左束支传导阻滞患者心肌瘢痕进行定位
J Electrocardiol. 2013 May-Jun;46(3):249-55. doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2013.02.006. Epub 2013 Mar 26.