Wang Chunsheng, Zhao Kewei, Hu Shanliang, Huang Yong, Ma Li, Li Minghuan, Song Yipeng
Department of Radiation Oncology, Qingdao University Medical College Affiliated Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital, Yantai, China.
Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Front Oncol. 2020 Sep 3;10:1630. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.01630. eCollection 2020.
The maximum standardized uptake values (SUVmax) derived from F-fluorodeoxy-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (F-FDG PET/CT) have some well-known shortcomings in predicting treatment response and prognosis in oncology. The standardized SUVmax with an appropriate reference background may overcome this problem in some instances. This study explored the prognostic value of the tumor-to-liver SUVmax ratio (SUV) and the tumor-to-blood pool SUVmax ratio (SUV) in predicting the objective response (OR) and overall survival (OS) in patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer after concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT). We retrospectively analyzed 128 newly diagnosed esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients who were treated with CCRT. The SUVmax of primary tumor, SUV, SUV and clinicopathologic features data were analyzed. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to determine the predictors of tumor response. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards model. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis demonstrated that SUV was superior to SUVmax and SUV in predicting treatment response. Univariate and multivariate analyses revealed that advanced tumor stage (hazard ratio [HR] = 9.67; 95% CI: 1.15-81.28; = 0.037) and high SUV (HR = 21.92; 95% CI: 2.26-212.96; = 0.008) were independent predictors of poor treatment response. Cox regression analysis showed that good clinical tumor response ( < 0.014, HR =0.501; 95% CI: 0.288-0.871) was a favorable independent predictive factor for OS, while an advanced tumor stage (p = 0.018, HR = 1.796; 95% CI: 1.107-2.915) and a high SUV ( < 0.002, HR = 2.660; 95% CI: 1.425-4.967) were prognostic factors for poor OS. The median OS of patients in the low SUV and high SUV groups was 13.47 vs. 19.30 months, respectively. PET-derived SUV is superior to tumor SUVmax and SUV in predicting treatment response and overall survival in patients with ESCC undergoing CCRT. High SUV was an independent predictor of poor treatment response and shorter overall survival.
F-氟脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层扫描/计算机断层扫描(F-FDG PET/CT)得出的最大标准化摄取值(SUVmax)在预测肿瘤学中的治疗反应和预后方面存在一些众所周知的缺点。具有适当参考背景的标准化SUVmax在某些情况下可能会克服这个问题。本研究探讨了肿瘤与肝脏SUVmax比值(SUV)和肿瘤与血池SUVmax比值(SUV)在预测同步放化疗(CCRT)后局部晚期食管癌患者的客观缓解(OR)和总生存期(OS)方面的预后价值。我们回顾性分析了128例接受CCRT治疗的新诊断食管鳞状细胞癌(ESCC)患者。分析了原发肿瘤的SUVmax、SUV、SUV及临床病理特征数据。采用单因素和多因素分析来确定肿瘤反应的预测因素。使用Kaplan-Meier法和Cox比例风险模型进行生存分析。受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析表明,在预测治疗反应方面,SUV优于SUVmax和SUV。单因素和多因素分析显示,肿瘤晚期(风险比[HR]=9.67;95%可信区间:1.15-81.28;P=0.037)和高SUV(HR=21.92;95%可信区间:2.26-212.96;P=0.008)是治疗反应差的独立预测因素。Cox回归分析表明,良好的临床肿瘤反应(P<0.014,HR=0.501;95%可信区间:0.288-0.871)是OS的有利独立预测因素,而肿瘤晚期(P=0.018,HR=1.796;95%可信区间:1.107-2.915)和高SUV(P<0.002,HR=2.660;95%可信区间:1.425-4.967)是OS不良的预后因素。低SUV组和高SUV组患者的中位OS分别为13.47个月和19.30个月。PET衍生的SUV在预测接受CCRT的ESCC患者的治疗反应和总生存期方面优于肿瘤SUVmax和SUV。高SUV是治疗反应差和总生存期较短的独立预测因素。