Miller Peter G, Gibson Christopher J, Mehta Arnav, Sperling Adam S, Frederick Dennie T, Manos Michael P, Miao Benchun, Hacohen Nir, Hodi F Stephen, Boland Genevieve M, Ebert Benjamin L
Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Broad Institute of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard, Cambridge, MA.
JCO Precis Oncol. 2020 Sep 9;4. doi: 10.1200/PO.20.00186. eCollection 2020.
Conventional cytotoxic therapies increase the risk of clonal hematopoiesis and select for -mutant clones, which carry a high risk for transformation to therapy-related myelodysplastic neoplasms. In contrast, the effect of immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) on clonal hematopoiesis is unknown.
Paired peripheral-blood samples taken before and after treatment with ICB were obtained for 91 patients with either cutaneous melanoma or basal cell carcinoma. Error-corrected sequencing of a targeted panel of genes recurrently mutated in clonal hematopoiesis was performed on peripheral-blood genomic DNA.
The average interval between acquisition of the paired samples was 180 days. Forty-one percent of the patients had clonal hematopoiesis at a variant allele frequency (VAF) > 0.01 in the pretreatment sample. There was near-complete agreement in the distribution and burden of clonal hematopoiesis mutations in the paired blood samples, with 87 of 88 mutations identified across the cohort present in paired samples, regardless of the duration between sample collection. The VAF in the paired samples also showed a high correlation, with an = 0.95 ( < .0001). In contrast to cytotoxic therapy, exposure to ICB did not lead to selection of - or -mutant clones. However, consistent with the known effects of DNA-damaging therapy, we identified one patient who had eight unique mutations in the posttreatment blood sample after receiving two courses of radiation therapy.
There was no expansion of hematopoietic clones or selection for clones at high risk for malignant transformation in patients who received ICB, observations that warrant further validation in larger cohorts. These findings highlight an important difference between ICB and conventional cytotoxic therapies and their respective impacts on premalignant genetic lesions.
传统的细胞毒性疗法会增加克隆性造血的风险,并选择突变克隆,这些克隆具有转化为治疗相关骨髓增生异常肿瘤的高风险。相比之下,免疫检查点阻断(ICB)对克隆性造血的影响尚不清楚。
收集了91例皮肤黑色素瘤或基底细胞癌患者在ICB治疗前后的配对外周血样本。对外周血基因组DNA进行了对克隆性造血中反复突变的一组靶向基因的纠错测序。
配对样本采集的平均间隔时间为180天。41%的患者在预处理样本中存在变异等位基因频率(VAF)>0.01的克隆性造血。配对血样中克隆性造血突变的分布和负担几乎完全一致,该队列中鉴定出的88个突变中有87个存在于配对样本中,与样本采集之间的持续时间无关。配对样本中的VAF也显示出高度相关性,r = 0.95(P <.0001)。与细胞毒性疗法不同,接受ICB治疗并未导致选择TP53或NRAS突变克隆。然而,与DNA损伤疗法的已知作用一致,我们鉴定出一名患者在接受两疗程放射治疗后的治疗后血样中有8个独特的TP53突变。
接受ICB治疗的患者中没有造血克隆的扩增或对具有恶性转化高风险克隆的选择,这些观察结果需要在更大的队列中进一步验证。这些发现突出了ICB与传统细胞毒性疗法之间的重要差异及其对癌前遗传病变的各自影响。