Sayın Pınar, Bostancı Özgür, Türk Hacer Şebnem, Işıl Canan Tülay, Oba Sibel, Mihmanlı Mehmet
Department of Anestesiology and Reanimation, Sisli Hamidiye Etfal Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Department of General Surgery, Sisli Hamidiye Etfal Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Turk J Surg. 2020 Jun 8;36(2):172-179. doi: 10.5578/turkjsurg.4275. eCollection 2020 Jun.
Esophagoduodenoscopy and colonoscopy can be done as bidirectional endoscopy in the same session. The aim of this study was to compare anesthetic requirements and hemodynamic effects in esophagoduodenoscopy or colonoscopy done first for bidirectional endoscopy.
Eighty patients, aged 18-70 years with an American Society of Anesthesiologists Classification (ASA) as I-III, were included randomly into this study. The patients were allocated into two groups: Group C: first colonoscopy followed by esophagoduodenoscopy. Group E: first esophagoduodenoscopy followed by colonoscopy. All patients received standard anesthesia with 1 µg/kg fentanyl and 1 mg/kg propofol. Demographical variables, Heart rate SpO, Ramsey Sedation Score were recorded every 10 minutes. Total propofol consumption, retching during esophagoduodenoscopy and time to reach cecum were also recorded. Endoscopist and patient satisfaction were questioned.
Retching during esophagoduodenoscopy was not statistically significantly different in both groups. Total procedure duration and esophagoduodenoscopy duration were statistically significant longer in Group E. Complication frequency was higher in Group E. Endoscopist and patient satisfaction were lower in Group E. There was no difference in time to reach the cecum and the recovering period. Additional propofol dose was increased in Group E.
Regarding shorter procedural duration, lower consumption amount of propofol and fewer complications, it could be a better choice to start bidirectional procedure with colonoscopy first.
食管十二指肠镜检查和结肠镜检查可在同一会诊中作为双向内镜检查进行。本研究的目的是比较在双向内镜检查中先进行食管十二指肠镜检查或结肠镜检查时的麻醉需求和血流动力学效应。
80例年龄在18 - 70岁、美国麻醉医师协会分级(ASA)为I - III级的患者被随机纳入本研究。患者被分为两组:C组:先进行结肠镜检查,然后进行食管十二指肠镜检查。E组:先进行食管十二指肠镜检查,然后进行结肠镜检查。所有患者均接受1μg/kg芬太尼和1mg/kg丙泊酚的标准麻醉。每10分钟记录人口统计学变量、心率、血氧饱和度、拉姆齐镇静评分。还记录丙泊酚总消耗量、食管十二指肠镜检查期间的干呕情况以及到达盲肠的时间。对内镜医师和患者的满意度进行了询问。
两组在食管十二指肠镜检查期间的干呕情况在统计学上无显著差异。E组的总操作时间和食管十二指肠镜检查时间在统计学上显著更长。E组的并发症发生率更高。E组的内镜医师和患者满意度更低。到达盲肠的时间和恢复期无差异。E组额外的丙泊酚剂量增加。
关于更短的操作时间、更低的丙泊酚消耗量和更少的并发症,先进行结肠镜检查开始双向操作可能是更好的选择。