Detection of CTCs and CSCs in the staging and metastasis of non-small cell lung cancer based on microfluidic chip and the diagnostic significance.

OBJECTIVE

Dynamic monitoring of CTCs/CSCs can assist in the diagnosis and prognosis of tumors. This study explores the diagnostic significance of microfluidic chip technology in the detection of CTCs/CSCs in clinical staging and metastasis of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). That lays a solid foundation for the use of microfluidic chips to monitor CTCs/CSCs for the stage and metastasis of patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This study collected 80 patients with lung cancer from October 2017 to October 2018. Meanwhile, 30 healthy people and 30 patients with benign lung diseases were selected during the same period as the control group 1 and the control group 2, respectively. CellSearch (Huntington Valley, PA, USA) and microfluidic chip were used to detect CTCs, the sensitivities were recorded. ELISA methods were used to detect the concentrations of tumor markers VEGF-C, CEA, and CA125 in serum, and their association with CTCs and CSCs was analyzed. In addition, after 3 months, we followed up 40 patients with lung cancer, recorded their prognosis, and extracted peripheral blood to detect changes in their CTCs and CSCs. The CellSearch (Huntington Valley, PA, USA) system and the microfluidic chip system were used to detect the CTCs in patients with lung cancer, and the sensitivity and specificity of the patients were analyzed. The changes in CTCs and CSCs in the peripheral blood of the patient were recorded.

RESULTS

It can be seen that the positive rate of CTCs and CSCs is not significantly correlated with the patients' age, gender, pathological type (adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma), etc. They are significantly correlated with clinical stage (I + II and III + IV) and metastasis (metastasis and non-metastasis) (p<0.01). Then, we divided the patients into groups for testing, and analyzed the association between different groups of patients and CTCs and CSCs. Compared with control group 1 and control group 2, the positive rates of CTCs and CSCs in lung cancer metastasis group and non-metastasis group were significantly different (p<0.05). Compared with the control group 1 and control group 2, the positive rates of CTCs and CSCs in stage I + II and III + IV of lung cancer were significantly different (p<0.05). The positive rate was significantly higher in the cancer metastasis group (p<0.05). The concentrations of tumor markers VEGF-C, CEA, CA125 in the serum of patients were consistent with CTCs-negative and CTC-positive lung cancer, with significant differences (p<0.05). CSCs negative and CSCs positive patients have similar results. Subsequently, we analyzed the sensitivity and specificity of CSCs, CTCs, and tumor markers for the diagnosis of NSCLC. The results showed that the sensitivity of CSCs and CTCs to diagnose patients was significantly higher than that of tumor markers.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that our microfluidic chip device can exhibit relatively good performance and can better detect CTCs and CSCs. Monitoring CTCs and CSCs of patients can provide a basis for judging the stage and metastasis of patients.