University of Michigan.
The University of Western Ontario.
Popul Stud (Camb). 2020 Nov;74(3):415-435. doi: 10.1080/00324728.2020.1817529. Epub 2020 Oct 5.
Do different operationalizations of family structure offer different understandings of the links between family structure and older adult mortality? Using the American Health and Retirement Study ( = 29,665), we examine mortality risks by three measures of family structure: whether respondents have different family statuses (e.g. married vs. unmarried), volume of family members available (e.g. having one vs. two living immediate family members), and family embeddedness (e.g. having neither spouse nor child vs. having spouse but no child). We focus on three kin types: partner/spouse, children, and siblings. We find that differences in empirical estimates across measures of family structure are not dramatic, but that family embeddedness can show some additional heterogeneity in mortality patterns over family status variables or the volume of ties. This paper tests different ways of operationalizing family structure to study mortality outcomes and advances our understanding of how family functions as a key social determinant of health.
不同的家庭结构操作化方式是否提供了对家庭结构与老年人口死亡率之间联系的不同理解?我们使用美国健康与退休研究( = 29665),通过三种家庭结构测量方法来检验死亡率风险:受访者是否具有不同的家庭状况(例如已婚与未婚)、家庭成员数量(例如有一个还是两个直系家庭成员)和家庭嵌入度(例如既没有配偶也没有孩子,还是既有配偶也没有孩子)。我们关注三种亲属类型:伴侣/配偶、子女和兄弟姐妹。我们发现,家庭结构测量方法之间的实证估计差异并不显著,但家庭嵌入度可以在家庭状况变量或关系数量上显示出死亡率模式的一些额外异质性。本文测试了不同的家庭结构操作化方法来研究死亡率结果,并增进了我们对家庭如何作为健康的关键社会决定因素发挥作用的理解。