• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

次要任务对驾驶员路口会车接受度和情境意识的影响。

The effect of a secondary task on drivers' gap acceptance and situational awareness at junctions.

机构信息

School of Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.

School of Architecture, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Ergonomics. 2021 Feb;64(2):184-198. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2020.1822548. Epub 2020 Oct 5.

DOI:10.1080/00140139.2020.1822548
PMID:33016818
Abstract

The current studies explored the roles of the visuospatial and phonological working memory subsystems on drivers' gap acceptance and memory for approaching vehicles at junctions. Drivers' behaviour was measured in a high-fidelity driving simulator when at a junction, with, and without a visuospatial or phonological load. When asked to judge when to advance across the junction, gap acceptance thresholds, memory for vehicles and eye movements were not different when there was a secondary task compared to control. However, drivers' secondary task performance was more impaired in the visuospatial than phonological domain. These findings suggest that drivers were able to accept impairment in the secondary task while maintaining appropriate safety margins and situational awareness. These findings can inform the development of in-car technologies, improving the safety of road users at junctions. Despite research indicating that concurrent performance on working memory tasks impairs driving, a matched visuospatial or phonological memory load did not change drivers' gap acceptance or situational awareness at junctions. Drivers displayed appropriate compensatory behaviour by prioritising the driving task over the visuospatial secondary task. ROW: right of way; RIG: random time interval generation.

摘要

当前的研究探讨了视空间和语音工作记忆子系统在驾驶员交叉口车辆接近间隙接受和记忆中的作用。在驾驶模拟器中测量了驾驶员在交叉口的行为,在有和没有视空间或语音负载的情况下。当被要求判断何时穿过交叉口时,与对照相比,进行次要任务时的间隙接受阈值、车辆记忆和眼动没有差异。然而,驾驶员在视空间领域的次要任务表现比语音领域更差。这些发现表明,驾驶员在接受次要任务的损害的同时,仍能保持适当的安全裕度和情境意识。这些发现可以为车内技术的发展提供信息,提高交叉口道路使用者的安全性。尽管有研究表明,同时进行工作记忆任务会损害驾驶,但匹配的视空间或语音记忆负荷不会改变驾驶员在交叉口的间隙接受或情境意识。驾驶员通过将驾驶任务置于视空间次要任务之上,表现出适当的补偿行为。

相似文献

1
The effect of a secondary task on drivers' gap acceptance and situational awareness at junctions.次要任务对驾驶员路口会车接受度和情境意识的影响。
Ergonomics. 2021 Feb;64(2):184-198. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2020.1822548. Epub 2020 Oct 5.
2
The role of working memory in supporting drivers' situation awareness for surrounding traffic.工作记忆在支持驾驶员对周围交通情况的感知中的作用。
Hum Factors. 2010 Dec;52(6):663-73. doi: 10.1177/0018720810385427.
3
Effects of conversation on situation awareness and working memory in simulated driving.会话对模拟驾驶中情境意识和工作记忆的影响。
Hum Factors. 2014 Sep;56(6):1077-92. doi: 10.1177/0018720813519265.
4
Comparing drivers' visual attention at Junctions in Real and Simulated Environments.比较真实环境和模拟环境中驾驶员在交叉口处的视觉注意力。
Appl Ergon. 2019 Oct;80:89-101. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2019.05.005. Epub 2019 May 25.
5
The 'Saw but Forgot' error: A role for short-term memory failures in understanding junction crashes?“看了却忘”错误:短期记忆失败在理解结处碰撞中起作用?
PLoS One. 2019 Sep 23;14(9):e0222905. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222905. eCollection 2019.
6
Comparing car drivers' and motorcyclists' opinions about junction crashes.比较汽车驾驶员和摩托车驾驶员对路口事故的看法。
Accid Anal Prev. 2018 Aug;117:304-317. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2018.05.001. Epub 2018 May 9.
7
Assessment of Drivers' Mental Workload by Multimodal Measures during Auditory-Based Dual-Task Driving Scenarios.基于听觉的驾驶双重任务情境下多模态测量评估驾驶员的精神工作负荷。
Sensors (Basel). 2024 Feb 5;24(3):1041. doi: 10.3390/s24031041.
8
Drivers' Visual Search Behavior Toward Vulnerable Road Users at Junctions as a Function of Cycling Experience.驾驶员在交叉口对弱势道路使用者的视觉搜索行为随骑行经验的变化。
Hum Factors. 2018 Nov;60(7):889-901. doi: 10.1177/0018720818778960. Epub 2018 Jun 15.
9
Driving responses of older and younger drivers in a driving simulator.老年和年轻驾驶员在驾驶模拟器中的驾驶反应。
Annu Proc Assoc Adv Automot Med. 2007;51:559-72.
10
Use of a fixed-base driving simulator to evaluate the effects of experience and PC-based risk awareness training on drivers' decisions.使用固定基座驾驶模拟器评估经验和基于个人电脑的风险意识培训对驾驶员决策的影响。
Hum Factors. 2002 Summer;44(2):287-302. doi: 10.1518/0018720024497853.