Matsuno Em, Goodman Joshua A, Israel Tania, Choi Andrew Young, Lin Yen-Jui, Kary Krishna G
Department of Counseling, Clinical, and School Psychology, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA, USA.
Los Angeles County, Department of Mental Health, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
J Homosex. 2020 Oct 5:1-23. doi: 10.1080/00918369.2020.1819714.
Sexual and gender minorities (SGM) may benefit from psychological interventions tailored to specific subpopulations (e.g., lesbians, gay men, bisexual people, transgender people) given differing experiences with stigma. However, determining the inclusion/exclusion process for subpopulation-specific interventions is challenging and recommendations for this process are scarce. We developed and evaluated a matching procedure to place 1183 SGM participants into four targeted online interventions designed to reduce internalized stigma for lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender people. We evaluated participant attrition, efficacy, satisfaction with placement, and qualitative feedback across the four interventions. Results indicated that our matching procedure was time-efficient and largely successful in terms of low attrition, high satisfaction, and reaching segments of the SGM population not usually captured with the LGBT acronym. Based on these findings, we offer six practical guidelines for devising the inclusion/exclusion process or matching procedure for future subpopulation-specific SGM interventions studies.
性与性别少数群体(SGM)可能会受益于针对特定亚群体(例如女同性恋者、男同性恋者、双性恋者、跨性别者)量身定制的心理干预措施,因为他们遭受污名化的经历各不相同。然而,确定针对特定亚群体干预措施的纳入/排除流程具有挑战性,而且针对这一流程的建议也很少。我们开发并评估了一种匹配程序,将1183名SGM参与者分配到四项有针对性的在线干预措施中,这些措施旨在减少女同性恋者、男同性恋者、双性恋者和跨性别者的内化污名。我们评估了四项干预措施中的参与者损耗、效果、对分配的满意度以及定性反馈。结果表明,我们的匹配程序效率高,在低损耗、高满意度以及覆盖通常未被LGBT首字母缩写词涵盖的SGM人群方面基本成功。基于这些发现,我们为未来针对特定亚群体的SGM干预研究设计纳入/排除流程或匹配程序提供了六条实用指南。