• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

入院血压与血管内治疗结局:ASTER 试验的二次分析。

Admission Blood Pressure and Outcome of Endovascular Therapy: Secondary Analysis of ASTER Trial.

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, United States.

Department of Stroke Center, Foch Hospital, Suresnes, France.

出版信息

J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2020 Dec;29(12):105347. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2020.105347. Epub 2020 Oct 3.

DOI:10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2020.105347
PMID:33017755
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Elevated blood pressure (BP) is common among patients presenting with acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusions. The literature is inconsistent regarding the association between admission BP and outcome of mechanical thrombectomy (MT). Moreover, it is unclear whether the first line thrombectomy strategy (stent retriever [SR] versus contact aspiration [CA]) modifies the relationship between BP and outcome.

METHODS

This is a post hoc analysis of the ASTER (Contact Aspiration Versus Stent Retriever for Successful Revascularization) randomized trial. BP was measured prior to randomization in all included patients. Co-primary outcomes included 90-day functional independence (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] 0-2) and successful revascularization (modified Treatment in Cerebral Ischemia [mTICI] 2b-3). Secondary outcomes included symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH) and parenchymal hemorrhage (PH) within 24 hours.

RESULTS

A total of 381 patients were included in the present study. Mean (SD) systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP) were 148 (26) mm Hg and 81 (16) mm Hg, respectively. There was no association between SBP or DBP and successful revascularization or 90-day functional independence. Similarly, there was no association between admission SBP or DBP with sICH or PH. Subgroup analysis based on the first-line thrombectomy strategy revealed similar results with no heterogeneity across groups.

CONCLUSION

Admission BP was not associated with functional, angiographic or safety outcomes. Results were similar in both CA and CA groups.

摘要

背景

由于大血管闭塞,急性缺血性脑卒中患者的血压(BP)升高较为常见。文献中关于入院 BP 与机械取栓(MT)结局之间的关系并不一致。此外,尚不清楚一线取栓策略(支架取栓[SR]与接触抽吸[CA])是否改变了 BP 与结局之间的关系。

方法

这是 ASTER(接触抽吸与支架取栓治疗成功再通)随机试验的事后分析。所有纳入的患者在随机分组前均测量了 BP。主要结局包括 90 天功能独立性(改良 Rankin 量表[mRS]0-2)和成功再通(改良脑梗死治疗[mTICI]2b-3)。次要结局包括 24 小时内症状性颅内出血(sICH)和实质内出血(PH)。

结果

本研究共纳入 381 例患者。平均(SD)收缩压(SBP)和舒张压(DBP)分别为 148(26)mmHg 和 81(16)mmHg。SBP 或 DBP 与成功再通或 90 天功能独立性之间无相关性。同样,入院 SBP 或 DBP 与 sICH 或 PH 之间也无相关性。基于一线取栓策略的亚组分析显示,结果相似,组间无异质性。

结论

入院 BP 与功能、血管造影或安全性结局无关。在 CA 和 CA 两组中结果相似。

相似文献

1
Admission Blood Pressure and Outcome of Endovascular Therapy: Secondary Analysis of ASTER Trial.入院血压与血管内治疗结局:ASTER 试验的二次分析。
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2020 Dec;29(12):105347. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2020.105347. Epub 2020 Oct 3.
2
Contact Aspiration Versus Stent Retriever in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke With M2 Occlusion in the ASTER Randomized Trial (Contact Aspiration Versus Stent Retriever for Successful Revascularization).在 ASTER 随机试验(接触抽吸与支架取栓治疗成功再通的比较)中,急性缺血性脑卒中 M2 闭塞患者的接触抽吸与支架取栓的比较。
Stroke. 2018 Feb;49(2):461-464. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.019598. Epub 2017 Dec 28.
3
Similar Outcomes for Contact Aspiration and Stent Retriever Use According to the Admission Clot Burden Score in ASTER.ASTER 中根据入院血栓负荷评分,接触抽吸和支架取栓的结果相似。
Stroke. 2018 Jul;49(7):1669-1677. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.021120. Epub 2018 Jun 7.
4
Blood pressure reduction and outcome after endovascular therapy with successful reperfusion: a multicenter study.血管内治疗成功再灌注后血压降低与结果:一项多中心研究。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2020 Oct;12(10):932-936. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-015561. Epub 2019 Dec 5.
5
Blood Pressure and Outcome After Mechanical Thrombectomy With Successful Revascularization.血压与机械取栓成功再通后的结局。
Stroke. 2019 Sep;50(9):2448-2454. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.024687. Epub 2019 Jul 18.
6
First-Line Contact Aspiration vs Stent Retriever for Proximal Occlusion in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis.直接抽吸与支架取栓治疗急性缺血性脑卒中近端闭塞的一线接触:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2020 Dec;29(12):105374. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2020.105374. Epub 2020 Oct 27.
7
Adjustment of Stent Retriever Length to Clot Extent Affects First-Pass Reperfusion in Endovascular Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke.支架取栓长度的调整对急性缺血性脑卒中血管内治疗的首次再灌注的影响。
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2020;49(3):277-284. doi: 10.1159/000508028. Epub 2020 Jun 16.
8
Trevo 2000: Results of a Large Real-World Registry for Stent Retriever for Acute Ischemic Stroke.Trevo 2000:急性缺血性脑卒中支架取栓的大型真实世界登记研究结果。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Dec 18;7(24):e010867. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.010867.
9
Predictors of Outcome and Hemorrhage in Patients Undergoing Endovascular Therapy with Solitaire Stent for Acute Ischemic Stroke.使用Solitaire支架进行血管内治疗的急性缺血性卒中患者的预后及出血预测因素
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 7;10(12):e0144452. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0144452. eCollection 2015.
10
Blood Pressure After Endovascular Thrombectomy: Modeling for Outcomes Based on Recanalization Status.血管内血栓切除术术后血压:基于再通状态的结局建模。
Stroke. 2020 Feb;51(2):519-525. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.026914. Epub 2019 Dec 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Blood pressure management in reperfused ischemic stroke.再灌注缺血性卒中的血压管理
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 4;3(3):CD016085. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD016085.
2
Risk factors of hemorrhagic transformation in acute ischaemic stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis.急性缺血性卒中出血性转化的危险因素:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Front Neurol. 2023 Feb 20;14:1079205. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1079205. eCollection 2023.
3
Hemodynamics of Leptomeningeal Collaterals after Large Vessel Occlusion and Blood Pressure Management with Endovascular Treatment.
大血管闭塞后软脑膜侧支循环的血流动力学及血管内治疗的血压管理
J Stroke. 2021 Sep;23(3):343-357. doi: 10.5853/jos.2021.02446. Epub 2021 Sep 30.