Shirbani F, Hui N, Tan I, Butlin M, Avolio A P
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2020 Jul;2020:2642-2645. doi: 10.1109/EMBC44109.2020.9176731.
Video-based photoplethysmography (vPPG) enables remote and contactless detection of the peripheral pulse of blood flow. This provides a potential mean to extract heart rate (HR) and pulse transit time (PTT) for the purpose of remote health monitoring. The accuracy of average HR and PTT extracted from a two-minute vPPG recording has been investigated at six different lighting conditions among participants with a range of Fitzpatrick skin scores. 12 healthy volunteers (6 females, 27 ± 6 years) were recruited. The video, electrocardiogram and finger PPG were acquired from immobile resting subjects. The vPPG signals from red, green and blue channels, and a combination of those were investigated. The vPPG signals were extracted from two regions of interest (ROIs): one on the forehead and one on the palm of the left hand. The estimated HR error (HR-error) was significantly lower for vPPG from green channels in both ROIs (ROI1 [p<0.001], ROI2 [p<0.05]). The signal from ROI1 demonstrated lower HR-error than ROI2 (p<0.001). HR-error from the darkest lighting conditions (Lumen 1 and 2) were significantly higher than the others (p<0.05). Furthermore, HR-error showed a positive correlation with skin tone scores in every lighting condition. However, at brighter lighting intensity, HR-error was independent of the skin tone score. PTT calculated from vPPG (vPTT) were compared between the 6 levels of lightings and the result was significantly different (p<0.05). In darker lighting conditions, the vPTT increased. Pulse arrival time measured from PPG (PAT-PPG) was calculated, and a positive correlation was found between the ratio of vPTT/PAT-PPG and skin tone score at six different lightings. However, this dependency decreases in brighter lighting intensity. These results suggest that HR-error and the ratio of vPTT/PAT increase with darker skins and at darker backgrounds. However, at brighter lighting conditions, the skin tone score is not a confounder of vPPG accuracy.
基于视频的光电容积脉搏波描记法(vPPG)能够对周边血流脉搏进行远程非接触式检测。这为提取心率(HR)和脉搏传输时间(PTT)以用于远程健康监测提供了一种潜在手段。在一系列不同菲茨帕特里克皮肤评分的参与者中,研究了从两分钟的vPPG记录中提取的平均HR和PTT在六种不同光照条件下的准确性。招募了12名健康志愿者(6名女性,年龄27±6岁)。从静止休息的受试者获取视频、心电图和手指PPG。研究了来自红色、绿色和蓝色通道以及这些通道组合的vPPG信号。vPPG信号从两个感兴趣区域(ROI)提取:一个在额头,一个在左手手掌。在两个ROI中,绿色通道的vPPG估计HR误差(HR误差)显著更低(ROI1 [p<0.001],ROI2 [p<0.05])。来自ROI1的信号显示出比ROI2更低的HR误差(p<0.001)。最暗光照条件(流明1和2)下的HR误差显著高于其他条件(p<0.05)。此外,在每种光照条件下,HR误差与肤色评分呈正相关。然而,在较亮的光照强度下,HR误差与肤色评分无关。比较了vPPG计算得到的PTT(vPTT)在6种光照水平下的情况,结果有显著差异(p<0.05)。在较暗的光照条件下,vPTT增加。计算了从PPG测量得到的脉搏到达时间(PAT-PPG),发现在六种不同光照下,vPTT/PAT-PPG的比值与肤色评分之间存在正相关。然而,在较亮的光照强度下,这种相关性降低。这些结果表明,HR误差和vPTT/PAT的比值在肤色较深以及背景较暗时会增加。然而,在较亮的光照条件下,肤色评分不是vPPG准确性的混杂因素。